Late last month, a court in the United Kingdom heard how a 14-year-old British girl was once told, “This is what white girls are for,” before a Muslim teen around her age raped her.
In the victim’s own words:
He said it was my own fault, I'd led him on. I shouldn't have walked around in what I was dressed in. I deserved it and that is what white girls were for.
He would also refer to her as his “white s**t.”
The same court heard about how another Muslim man, after raping another British girl, called her both a “white s**t” and a “dirty b***h,” before spitting at her and laughing.
Now, what’s striking about these revelations is that the very same logic and verbatim words have been used by countless sexual assailants of a certain religion who tend to see the females of a certain race as nymphomaniacal masochists who want nothing else in life but to be degraded, used, and abused.
Here are but a few more examples:
In 2014, a Muslim man explained to another British woman why he was sexually assaulting her: “You white women are good at it,” said he, between her crying and struggling.
That, of course, is just another variant of “This is what white girls are for,” as that other, more recent UK courtroom heard last month (on June 25).
In 2020, another British woman revealed that her Muslim molesters called her a “white c**t, a “white w***e, and a “white b***h.”
In 2019, another court heard how a British girl was “passed around like a piece of meat” among her Muslim abusers. Speaking now as an adult, the court heard how she was “raped on a dirty mattress above a takeaway and forced to perform sex acts in a churchyard,” and how one of her abusers “urinated on her in an act of humiliation” afterwards.
In 2018, another British woman was trafficked to Morocco, where dozens of men sexually assaulted her. They “made me believe I was nothing more than a s**t and a white w***e” she recollects. “They treated me like a leper, apart from when they wanted sex. I was less than human to them, I was rubbish.”
In 2015, another Muslim man called a 13-year-old virgin girl “a little white slag” — British slang for “promiscuous woman” — before forcibly de-virginizing her.
In 2013, not only did Dr. Taj Hargey, a British imam, confirm that the majority of the UK’s “imams promote grooming rings.” He said Muslim men are taught that women are “second-class citizens, little more than chattels or possessions over whom they have absolute authority” and that the imams preach a doctrine that “denigrates all women, but treats whites with particular contempt.”
There’s certainly no doubting that last point: While this phenomenon manifests itself with extreme regularity in that bastion of diversity, the UK, it’s ultimately less about being British and more about being white.
The proof is that the same thing is happening all across Europe.
Thus, in Germany, after a group of Muslim migrants stalked a 25-year-old woman, hurling “filthy” insults at and taunting her for sex, they too explained their logic: “German girls are just there for sex,” they said, before reaching into her blouse and groping her.
Another Muslim man, who almost killed his 25-year-old German victim while raping her — and while shouting “Allah!” — afterwards inquired if she liked it.
Even down under in Australia, a Muslim cabbie groped and insulted his female passengers, including by saying, “All Australian women are s***s and deserve to be raped.”
What makes this matter even more troubling is that it’s not limited to or a byproduct of the modern era; from the very start of Islam, 14 centuries ago, Muslim men have always portrayed European women — even chaste nuns — as both sexually desirable and sexually promiscuous by nature.
And, as usual, it all traces back to Muhammad, the prophet of Islam. As Ahmad M. H. Shboul, a Western academic of Muslim origin, euphemistically writes,
The Byzantines as a people were considered fine examples of physical beauty, and youthful slaves and slave-girls of Byzantine origins were highly valued. . . . The Arabs’ appreciation of the Byzantine female has a long history indeed. For the Islamic period, the earliest literary evidence we have is a hadith (saying of the Prophet). Muhammad is said to have addressed a newly converted Arab: “Would you like the girls of Banu al-Asfar?”
Banu al-Asfar can be translated as the fair-haired and/or skinned people.
Despite this academic’s fine take on the Arabs’ “appreciation” of Byzantine women — who essentially represented the Europeans nearest to Arabia — Muhammad’s question was meant to entice the man to join the Tabuk campaign against the Byzantines and reap its rewards—that is, the sexual enslavement of fair women.
Indeed, right from the start, European women, typified by neighboring Byzantine women, became the Muslim world’s “beautiful femme fatale who makes men lose their self-control,” to quote another academic, Nadia Maria el-Cheikh, author of "Byzantium Viewed by the Arabs." She continues:
Our [Arab] sources show not Byzantine women but writers’ images of these women, who served as symbols of the eternal female—constantly a potential threat, particularly due to blatant exaggerations of their sexual promiscuity. In our [Arabic] texts, Byzantine women are strongly associated with sexual immorality. . . . While the one quality that our [Muslim] sources never deny is the beauty of Byzantine women, the image that they create in describing these women is anything but beautiful. Their depictions are, occasionally, excessive, virtually caricatures, overwhelmingly negative.
Such fevered fantasies — which “are clearly far from Byzantine reality,” continues el-Cheikh — existed only in the minds of Muslim men and “must be recognized for what they are: attempts to denigrate and defame a rival culture. . . . In fact, in Byzantium, women were expected to be retiring, shy, modest, and devoted to their families and religious observances. . . . The behavior of most women in Byzantium was a far cry from the depictions that appear in Arabic sources.”
Indeed. For example, Abu Uthman al-Jahiz, an Abbasid court scholar born around 776, insisted that the females of Constantinople were the “most shameless women in the whole world…. they find sex more enjoyable … [and] are prone to adultery.”
Writing about 150 years later, Abd al-Jabbar, another prominent Muslim scholar, claimed that “adultery is commonplace in the cities and markets of Byzantium” — so much so that even “the nuns from the convents went out to the fortresses to offer themselves to monks.”
And, just like all white women today — not just Brits — are viewed in this unflattering manner, so too were all white women then — not just Byzantines — viewed as depraved hussies by nature.
Thus, during the later Crusading era, in a written excerpt that goes to great (if not pornographic) lengths, Muhammad bin Hamed, aka Imad al-Din al-Isfahani, a celebrated Persian court scholar and poet from around 1125, explained how he once saw a ship approaching which contained “three hundred lovely Frankish women, full of youth and beauty.” The flattery ends there, and the fantasizing begins:
They glowed with ardour for carnal intercourse. They were all licentious harlots, proud and scornful, who took and gave, foul-fleshed and sinful . . . making love and selling themselves for gold . . . with nasal voices and fleshy thighs, blue-eyed and grey-eyed. . . . They dedicated as a holy offering what they kept between their thighs. . . . They maintained that they could make themselves acceptable to God by no better sacrifice than this. . . . They made themselves targets for men’s darts.
After Saladin conquered Jerusalem from the Franks in 1187, this same Imad al-Din, who was present and aged 62, launched into yet another sadomasochistic tirade extolling the sexual debasement of European women and children — about 8,000 of whom were enslaved:
How many well-guarded women were profaned, how many queens were ruled, and nubile girls married, and noble women given away, and miserly women forced to yield themselves, and women who had been kept hidden [nuns] stripped of their modesty . . . and free women occupied [meaning “penetrated”], and precious ones used for hard work, and pretty things put to the test, and virgins dishonoured and proud women deflowered . . . and happy ones made to weep! How many noblemen [Muslim lords] took them as concubines, how many ardent men blazed for one of them, and celibates were satisfied by them, and thirsty men sated by them, and turbulent men able to give vent to their passion. How many lovely women were the exclusive property of one man, how many great ladies were sold at low prices . . . and lofty ones abased . . . and those accustomed to thrones dragged down!
In short, Muslim sexual contempt for and degradation of white women — as s***s to be dominated and disgraced — has deep historical roots, fully consistent with modern-day events across the West.
But here’s the final obscenity: In the UK — where these attacks are most epidemic — you can be prosecuted simply for noticing it. That’s how far the rot has spread. That’s the price of telling the truth.
Video version of this article:
