News & Politics

Senate Dems Ignore Removal of 'Islam,' 'Jihad' from Homeland Security Documents

The FBI’s blatant doctoring of Orlando shooter Omar Mateen’s 911 call — removing references to the Islamic State (ISIS) and altering the word “Allah” to read “God” — is just scratching the surface of an “Orwellian censorship of intelligence materials,” and Senate Democrats entirely ignored the former officer who revealed this bombshell.

In a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on “Willful Blindness” on Tuesday, Philip Haney, a former officer with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and author of See Something, Say Nothing: A Homeland Security Officer Exposes the Government’s Submission to Jihad, testified on what he called “the first and second great purges.”

Haney testified that he was ordered to edit hundreds of documents to separate the Muslim Brotherhood from terrorism, and alleged that the federal government — even the DHS! — is working directly with the Muslim Brotherhood’s overall jihadist network, a network whose goal is to establish Sharia (Islamic law) across the world, including in America.

I was ordered by the Department of Homeland Security Headquarters to modify a euphemism, removing all linking information out of approximately 820 text subject records in our law enforcement system that almost exclusively had to do with the Muslim Brotherhood network here in the United States.

I was told to remove all unauthorized references to terrorism, that I was no longer allowed to do what are called Memorandoms of Information Received (what we call MOIRs), no more text records, no more research, and no more special treatment from the agency.

At exactly the same time, a controversial inaugural meeting took place on January 27th and 28th, 2010, between American Muslim leaders and the Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano… It was controversial because several of the individuals attended the invitation to the conference in D.C. were known affiliates of at least two of the same Muslim Brotherhood front groups that had just been named as unindicted co-conspirators in the largest terrorism trial in the history of the United States, the Holy Land Foundation Trial.

Also that spring, at least six individuals with known affiliations to the Muslim Brotherhood front groups were appointed to the countering violent extremism (CVE) working group.

In other words, groups which are organized to push the extension of Sharia had operatives working in the center of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. This is why the government redacts references to radical Islamic terrorism, and why between 2008 and 2016, references to Islam, Muslims, and jihad in official DHS documents dealing with countering violent extremism completely disappeared.

Next Page: Why exactly did the U.S. government back Muslim Brotherhood governments in Egypt, Libya, Algeria, and Syria?

Haney further added that “by the spring of 2010 we had come to a point that a CVP officer was literally removing information… on Muslim Brotherhood-linked individuals from the text.” All this at the same time as “the administration was bringing the very same individuals in to positions of influence to help create and implement our counterterrorism policy both in the domestic arena and in the foreign policy arena, as evidenced in our overt support of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, Libya, Algeria, and Syria.”

Haney alleged that these Islamic groups which had ties to the Muslim Brotherhood are united by one goal, the spread of Sharia across the world.

The goal, meaning the strategy of the Global Islamic Movement, is based on Qran 2.191-193, and it’s quite simple: to establish Sharia law everywhere in the world, including here in America, and there is an organization in the United States that’s actively doing that, called the Assembly of Muslim Jurists of America, a very benign-sounding name but in Arabic [it means] the group of lawyers implementing Sharia law in the United States, which is unconstitutional.

Haney also said that the mosques where Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik attended before the San Bernardino shooting and where Mateen attended before the Orlando shooting were in networks that DHS had files on, and that he was ordered to remove or doctor records about those networks. In other words, the purges that Haney was ordered to commit may be responsible for the government’s inability to prevent the San Bernardino and Orlando shootings.

“There’s no such thing as a lone-wolf terrorist,” Haney argued. The networks connecting terrorists and spreading the ideology of Sharia supremacy are far more integrated with the American government than we think, and this is the truly terrifying part of the War on Terror.

Despite this damning testimony of collusion between Sharia groups and our Department of Homeland Security, none of the Democrat senators who asked questions of the experts addressed a question to Haney about these document purges. Instead, they emphasized how it would be insulting to Christians to refer to the Ku Klux Klan and the Westboro Baptist Church as “radical Christians.”

Senator Ted Cruz, who chaired the hearing, blasted the Democrats for ignoring these key facts. “It saddens me that not a single one of my colleagues from the Democratic side of the aisle asked even a skeptical question about that purge,” Cruz declared. “The purge that resulted in deleting the word Jihad, from 126 times in the 9/11 report to zero in report after report after report.”

“Apparently the Orwellian censorship of law enforcement materials and intelligence materials is not a concern to my colleagues,” Cruz damningly concluded.

You can watch the entire hearing online here at C-SPAN.