The Morning Briefing: FBI Lawyer Thought Hillary Should Have Been Prosecuted and Much, Much More

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton waves to well-wishers following an appearance at Barnard College with New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, Monday, Jan. 7, 2019. (AP Photo/Kathy Willens)

Good Thursday morning!

Here is what’s on President Trump’s agenda today:

  • President Trump receives his intelligence briefing
  • The president has lunch with the acting secretary of the Interior
  • President Trump participates in a reception for National African American History Month
Advertisement

FBI Lawyer thought Hillary should be prosecuted for email shenanigans

Well slap my face and call me Sally.

The FBI’s top lawyer in 2016 thought Hillary Clinton and her team should have immediately realized they were mishandling “highly classified” information based on the obviously sensitive nature of the emails’ contents sent through her private server. And he believed she should have been prosecuted until “pretty late” in the investigation, according to a transcript of his closed-door testimony before congressional committees last October.

Former FBI general counsel James Baker said high-level officials at the bureau were “arguing about” whether to bring charges against Clinton, “I think, up until the end” — and he initially thought Clinton’s behavior was “alarming” and “appalling.”

Pursuant to the “statutes that we were considering at the time,” Baker told lawmakers, it was “the nature and scope of the classified information that, to me, initially, when I looked at it, I thought these folks should know that this stuff is classified, that it was alarming what they were talking about, especially some of the most highly classified stuff.

We were told by Comey the Redeemer that no reasonable prosecutor would bring charges against Hillary and her team for setting up a basement homebrewed internet server to conduct all United States Government State Department business: “although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case.”

Advertisement

But Baker disagreed.

“And I understood that, that you had to be persuaded, and stated as a basis that ultimately you were persuaded there was a lack of evidence establishing knowledge or criminal intent, correct?” the lawmaker asked.

Again, Baker replied, “Yes.”

Pressed on when exactly he changed his mind, Baker responded: “Sorry. Pretty late in the process, because we were arguing about it, I think, up until the end.”‘

Wow, and it keeps going.

“Well, I know there’s been a lot of public discussion about that,” Baker said, referring to Comey’s memos. “I believe if I had been persuaded that she had the intent, I would have argued that vociferously with him [Comey] and maybe changed his view. And I think he would have been receptive to changing his view even after he wrote that thing.”

He added: “My original belief — well, after having conducted the investigation and towards the end of it, then sitting down and reading a binder of her materials, I thought that it was alarming, appalling, whatever words I said, and argued with others about why they thought she shouldn’t be charged.”

Baker acknowledged, “I was struggling with the facts about even just ascertaining what literally did she know and what was reasonable to infer about what she knew.”

Advertisement

You don’t need to have INTENT to be guilty of mishandling classified information. There are people in prison for the same crime who didn’t have intent. What ridiculous reasoning. Read the full article.

Jussie Smollett case has gone from bad to worse

Smollett has been indicted.

He has hired Colin Kaepernick’s lawyer.

Many clear-headed people doubted Smollett’s story right out of the gate. If you weren’t drunk with Trump-hatred, Smollett’s claim that some MAGA hat-wearing, homophobic, white supremacist Empire fans were wandering around Chicago in subzero temperatures with some bleach and a noose…well, come on. It sounds ridiculous, right?

But more importantly, we know the media believed the story because they wanted to believe it. It fits their agenda and it fits their worldview. How many actual Trump voters do the elite media know? They probably don’t know any, so of course they think MAGA heads are carrying around nooses and bleach in their camouflage jackets in case they see a gay, black man they can beat, right?

Advertisement

Remember this?

Did you ever notice many of these MAGA hate crimes happen in hardcore blue neighborhoods like Brooklyn, New York City, Los Angeles, and Chicago? I had no idea so many Trump supporters live in these neighborhoods, but I’m supposed to believe lynchings are happening on the Upper West Side and on the NY Metro while not hearing reports from the deep South. Gimme a break.

Related:

Rep. Adam Schiff Deletes Sympathetic Tweet About Jussie Smollett

As it should be. Lemon: Smollett has lost in the court of public opinion

Omar apologizes to Jewish groups over her anti-Semitic tweets

Right.

Omar reportedly apologized in a confidential conference call with Jewish organizations on Tuesday night, according to multiple reports.

“Let me reiterate my sincere apology for any actual hurt my words have caused,” Omar reportedly said. “I know there are a lot of people who in the last weeks have expressed support in trying to say this isn’t anti-Semitic or this shouldn’t be looked at in that way.”

She added that it was up to the Jewish community to define anti-Semitism, according to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency.

“I do not want to give space or energy to anyone who wants to minimize the hurt,” she said.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, we have a fake hate group “watchdog” throwing accusations against their political enemies.

SPLC Whitewashes Democrats’ Ties To Anti-Semite Farrakhan, Nation Of Islam

Number of hate groups in US hits all-time high and Trump to blame: watchdog [fake watchdog, it’s the SPLC]

Historical picture of the day:

U.S. President Richard Nixon shakes hands with Communist Chinese leader Mao Tse-Tung during Nixon’s historic trip to China on February 21, 1972, in Peking. (AP Photo)

Other morsels:

Buh-bye. Trump says Alabama woman who joined ISIS should not return to US

Yikes: Coast Guard officer accused of plotting to kill Democrats, journalists

Soon? Bombshell Mueller report may never be fully revealed

79-year-old woman fends off intruder by firing 2 shots inside her Georgia home, 911 call reveals

Johnson & Johnson receives federal subpoenas related to baby powder litigation

Two cardinals blame ‘plague of the homosexual agenda’ for clerical sexual abuse

These North Korean Ambassadors Made It Out Of The Country Alive. But One Of Their Daughters Got Sent Back

Mentally ill man wounds eleven in yet another China knife attack

Michael Cohen to testify publicly before House committee next week

Frozen strawberry shipment from Mexico contained $12.7 million worth of meth, authorities say

Advertisement

Covington Catholic High student’s lawyer says lawsuit is ‘message’ for ‘weaponized’ Washington Post

Soy latte Swalwell bypasses coffee inside Trump Tower, tweets about it

German police raid 16 homes of suspected Islamic extremists

I guess we are all okay with this now. Virginia governor cancels first stop on listening tour after blackface controversy

And that’s all I’ve got, now go beat back the angry mob!

Recommended

Trending on PJ Media Videos

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Advertisement
Advertisement