02-19-2019 07:26:59 AM -0800
02-18-2019 09:36:51 AM -0800
02-18-2019 07:35:39 AM -0800
02-17-2019 12:39:26 PM -0800
02-17-2019 08:18:34 AM -0800
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.
PJ Media encourages you to read our updated PRIVACY POLICY and COOKIE POLICY.

Stretch, grab a late afternoon cup of caffeine and get caught up on the most important news of the day with our Coffee Break newsletter. These are the stories that will fill you in on the world that's spinning outside of your office window - at the moment that you get a chance to take a breath.
Sign up now to save time and stay informed!

House Dems to Mattis, Dunford: Don't Comply with Trump's 'Blatantly Unconstitutional' Transgender Order

WASHINGTON -- Lawmakers are urging Defense Secretary James Mattis and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Joseph Dunford to not comply with President Trump's directive to expel transgender service members, arguing that's an unconstitutional order.

In a letter today, dozens of Democrats from the House Armed Services Committee, House Judiciary Committee, and the Congressional LGBT Equality Caucus rejected "the premise that the presence of transgender troops interferes with the morale or combat readiness of our armed forces."

"As Members of Congress with an abiding interest in our nation’s military and its policies towards the LGBTQ community, we write to not only express our strong opposition to President Trump’s recent tweets seeking to ban transgender individuals from the military, but to remind you not to comply with any unconstitutional directive which may ultimately be issued," states the letter.

On July 26, Trump tweeted: "After consultation with my Generals and military experts, please be advised that the United States Government will not accept or allow Transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. Military. Our military must be focused on decisive and overwhelming victory and cannot be burdened with the tremendous medical costs and disruption that transgender in the military would entail. Thank you."

Dunford stated after Trump's trio of tweets that “there will be no modifications to the current policy until the president's direction has been received by the secretary of Defense and the secretary has issued implementation guidance." Mattis, who had maintained the policy of allowing existing transgender service members to serve openly but had recently extended the review period to study policy for admitting new transgender service members, was on vacation when Trump issued the tweets.

Coast Guard Commandant Paul Zukunft pledged in a forum this week at the Center for Strategic and International Studies that he will not turn his back on transgender personnel. "We have made an investment in you and you have made an investment in the Coast Guard, and I will not break faith," he said.

In their letter, House Dems noted that "federal court decisions have recognized that under our Constitution transgender people are protected against discrimination on the basis of sex – like everyone else – as well as on the basis of their transgender status," and "it is abundantly clear that any effort by President Trump to ban military service by transgender individuals would not only constitute poor policy, but would be unconstitutional on its face."

They added that the lengthy study conducted by RAND Corp. before the Pentagon allowed transgender troops was a "thoughtful deliberative process" while Trump's policy "was derived from a series of arbitrary and capriciously issued tweets" and "appears to be based on a raw political calculation."

"The proposed ban categorically excludes an entire group of people from military service on the basis of a characteristic that has no relevance to their capacity to serve," the letter continues. "As the respected leaders of our brave armed service members, you have no obligation to implement a hastily considered tweet designed to serve as a 'wedge' political issue; but rather you should honor your own independent duty to support and defend the Constitution of the United States."