Democrats have a problem, and his name is Hakeem Jeffries.
The House Minority Leader, who supposedly represents the future of the Democratic Party, is facing a rebellion from within his own ranks that would make even Nancy Pelosi raise an eyebrow.
According to an Axios survey of 113 Democratic incumbents and challengers in competitive House races, only 24 candidates are fully committed to backing Jeffries for another term. That's right: Fewer than a quarter of Democrats running in winnable races are willing to go all-in on their current leader.
The numbers tell a brutal story. Twenty respondents flat-out said they won't support Jeffries as speaker or minority leader, with five more leaning toward opposing him. The majority, 57 candidates, basically threw their hands up and said it's too early to commit, citing everything from ideological differences to concerns about his leadership style, messaging, and strategic decisions. When more than half your caucus won't even pretend to support you, that's not a leadership crisis waiting to happen — that's a leadership crisis already happening.
The timing couldn't be worse for Jeffries. The Schumer Shutdown just entered its third week, polls are turning against the Democrats, and instead of rallying around their leader, Democrats seem ready for an alternative.
This revolt isn't happening in a vacuum, either. Chuck Schumer is facing a potential primary challenge from Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, proving that Democratic leadership problems extend beyond the House. The radical left wing of the party smells blood in the water, and they're circling.
ICYMI: Democrats Just Got Some Bad News About the Schumer Shutdown
Some of Jeffries' most vocal critics are likely heading to Congress soon, which should keep him up at night. Radical candidates like Luke Bronin, Donavan McKinney, Mai Vang, Saikat Chakrabarti, and Patrick Roath have either declined to endorse Jeffries or openly backed alternative leadership. These aren't fringe candidates mumbling complaints in obscure corners of the internet, either. They're serious contenders who represent the future direction many Democrats want their party to take. Heath Howard and Kat Abughazaleh both expressed a desire for new leadership that would aggressively oppose President Trump and push for substantial progressive change. Amanda Edwards, running for a Texas House seat, highlighted the need for improved Democratic leadership to match the anger among the party base. Firefighter Harry Jarin went even further, criticizing current Democratic leadership for not reflecting the base's frustration and insisting this must change decisively.
Jeffries' spokesperson, Justin Chermol, defended his leadership by pointing to his focus on battling Trump, resolving the government shutdown, and addressing what he claimed were Republican-induced health care crises. But when only 24 out of 113 candidates in competitive races will openly support you, the spin doesn't matter much. The disconnect between Jeffries and his base is undeniable.
Now, we should pump the brakes before declaring this a full-blown mutiny. We've heard this song before with Nancy Pelosi, whose speakership faced multiple threatened revolts that never materialized. Democrats have a tendency to unify when it matters, even when they spend months publicly feuding. Jeffries is no Pelosi, but underestimating the Democratic establishment's survival instincts would be foolish.
Whether this revolt gains momentum or fizzles like past Democratic uprisings remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: Hakeem Jeffries has a serious problem on his hands, and it's not going away anytime soon.
The government is still closed, thanks to Chuck Schumer and radical Democrats who put illegals ahead of Americans. Polls are shifting fast as voters realize who’s really to blame. They own this disaster. Stay informed—join today with promo code POTUS47 for 74% off VIP membership.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member