Premium

Under Trump, Dictatorship Was Never a Concern. Judicial Oligarchy Is

AP Photo/Alex Brandon

For years, Democrats have branded Donald Trump a dictator, portraying him as a tyrant intent on undermining democratic norms. Ironically, their relentless lawfare against him poses a far greater threat to our government’s foundations and executive authority. Instead of facing a dictatorship, we confront the real danger of judicial oligarchy, which erodes the administration's ability to govern and undermines essential checks and balances. Immediate action is crucial to prevent this situation from spiraling further out of control. 

On Monday, a federal judge in Rhode Island ruled that the Trump administration violated a temporary restraining order (TRO) regarding spending freezes imposed by the White House. This ruling represents a historical overreach that directly undermines the executive branch's discretion in managing its operations. The judge's decision essentially declares that initiatives funded through USAID—often promoting leftist agendas like transgenderism and DEI programs—are now under the direct control of the courts. This unprecedented action endangers the principle that the executive has the authority to manage the administration without significant judicial interference.

This isn’t checks and balances; this is judicial overreach. Leftist judges, insulated by lifetime appointments, are expanding the powers of the judiciary far beyond the Founding Fathers' intentions. Make no mistake about it, this isn’t just about one judge’s ruling—it's a systematic effort to disrupt the functions of government, hamstringing the administration and potentially destabilizing our republic.

The implications of this decision extend beyond the Trump administration; they set a dangerous precedent that could legitimize further judicial intervention in executive affairs.

What is particularly alarming is the tactical approach that leftists appear to be taking. Typically, these temporary restraining orders are non-appealable, essentially keeping the Trump administration in a corner.

The anti-Trump resistance knows what it is doing. After years of systemic lawfare against Trump to try to prevent him from returning to the Oval Office, the strategy is now to use the courts to make it virtually impossible for him to govern.

Related: Trump Hits Back at Judge Who Halted DOGE’s Oversight of the Treasury

Consider U.S. District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer’s recent ruling. Appointed by Barack Obama, Engelmayer has barred members of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and even the Treasury secretary from accessing crucial payment and data systems—another blatant example of the judiciary eroding executive authority on behalf of the resistance.

The time has come for the Supreme Court to intervene. We must restore executive authority and put an end to the ongoing judicial overreach that is being wielded like a weapon against the Trump administration. If such tactics are left unchecked, we risk transforming our system of government from one guided by the Constitution into a judicial oligarchy that undermines the will of the people and the principles of representative governance.

Ending the radical left’s lawfare strategy is not just crucial for Trump; it’s vital for the preservation of our constitutional order. If we do not act swiftly to rein in this judicial activism, we may find ourselves in a precarious situation where the executive branch is rendered powerless, and the very fabric of our democracy is threatened. The stakes are high, and it's time for decisive action from the Supreme Court. 

Recommended

Trending on PJ Media Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement