And not just in its stock price: it’s cutting 1.5 inches from the width of its pages. While the Times understandably states that the smaller size will cut printing expenses, I’m surprised that they didn’t offer this as a excuse. It definitely would have gone down well with the Hamptons crowd.
Update: In contrast to the shrinking New York Times, is its chief tabloid-sized competitor poised to go national?
Blogging since 2002, affiliated with PJM since 2005, where he is currently a columnist, Dallas Editor, and founder of PJM's Lifestyle blog. Over the past 15 years, Ed has contributed articles to National Review Online, the Weekly Standard.com, Right Wing News, the New Individualist, Blogcritics, Modernism, Videomaker, Servo, Audio/Video Interiors, Electronic House, PC World, Computer Music, Vintage Guitar, and Guitar World. As an Amazon Associate, he earns from qualifying purchases. For media inquiries, please contact [email protected].
Join the conversation as a VIP Member