When in Poland, I walked through the old quarters of Kraków and Wrocław and found concrete and stone that have endured for centuries, through war, weather, and human activity.
It's where I touched Polish walls that have been standing for 700 to 800 years, remaining firm and still holding their shape, as if the masons who laid them will return tomorrow to check the status of their handiwork.
For me, it's like shaking hands with a long-dead craftsman whose grip is somehow stronger now than most structures poured in America within the past couple of decades.
I keep thinking of a family heirloom, such as a grandmother's cedar chest or an old oak table bearing the scars of time, yet still enduring. Compare that craftsmanship to the disposable particle board desk people buy today, which bows under the weight of a computer monitor or a plant. One is designed and built to last, while the other serves a season.
That same divide is true of Poland's medieval concrete and America's modern concrete slabs.
Why the Difference?
When examining concrete, it appears deceptively simple: aggregate, cement, water, and, most importantly, time. The way these ingredients are sourced, mixed, and cured determines whether a structure will stand for centuries or crumble within years.
It's a recipe perfected by Roman builders, who mixed volcanic ash with lime and seawater. When cracks formed in their aqueducts or harbors, the moisture triggered a chemical reaction with the volcanic material, causing the concrete to "self-heal." It's for this reason that Roman harbors poured in the first century continue to hold their shape after two millennia of seawater assault.
There wasn't a great deal of volcanic ash in Poland during medieval times, but the principle still holds; adding local lime, river sand, and stones into the mixes, creating dense, interlocking bonds. These structures cured slowly, which allowed the chemical hydration process to deepen, hardening them, rather than rushing it for the sake of deadlines.
We're not talking about the differences in chemistry, but of patience. Part of the recipe is time: A cured wall hardens in weeks differently than a highway lane that's been reopened within 48 hours.
How America Builds
Today's American concrete is engineered for speed and cost. Contractors face incredibly aggressive deadlines from municipalities wanting roads open yesterday, while developers want housing tracts finished before the deadline of the next quarter's report.
What happens?
We get thinner slaps with fast-setting mixes and chemical accelerators. Fly ash or slag substitutes are used in place of fast-setting mixes, and chemical accelerants replace mixtures incorporating durability rather than price.
Reinforced concrete, the staple of U.S. construction, is both a marvel and a curse. Steel rebar gives strength but also creates a ticking clock. When water seeps in and rusts the steel, the corrosion expands, causing the surrounding concrete to crack. Without constant maintenance, reinforced structures fail in decades. By contrast, Poland’s walls have no steel. Their strength is chemical, not borrowed from hidden rods destined to corrode.
Cultural Choices Reflected in Stone
Touching that Polish wall made me wonder: What does it say about us that our bridges and overpasses require major repair after a few decades, while Europe has city walls that resisted both time and artillery? The answer lies partly in engineering, partly in culture.
In Poland, every stone laid centuries ago was expected to stand as long as God allowed it to. Durability was both practical and moral. In America, permanence is treated as optional. We build, tear down, and rebuild with little thought to future generations. That mentality spills beyond construction. It shapes politics, culture, and even family life. We treat commitments like we treat infrastructure: temporary, replaceable, and negotiable.
Accountability Then and Now
There’s also a matter of respect. Medieval masons worked under guilds, where a good reputation meant survival. A poorly built structure wasn’t just an embarrassment; it was a stain that followed a craftsman and his family. Today, accountability is spread thin among contractors, subcontractors, inspectors, and government bureaucrats. When a parking ramp collapses or a bridge fails, those involved engage in finger-pointing instead of honor.
That Polish concrete carried the fingerprints of men who built for permanence. It wasn’t just their work on the line; it was their identity. Americans, in too many cases, have substituted checklists and contracts for character.
Related: Words as Currency, History as Weight
Lessons From the Past
The irony is that American engineers know how to make durable concrete. Research teams have replicated Roman formulas that use lime clasts, which, when exposed to water, expand and repair cracks on their own. We have access to pozzolanic materials such as volcanic ash, fly ash from coal plants, and ground blast furnace slag, all of which improve resilience.
And yet, in project after project, we default to formulas that save a few dollars upfront while guaranteeing billions in repairs down the road. A 2017 study estimated America spends more than $20 billion a year just maintaining and patching crumbling concrete infrastructure. That’s not inevitable. It’s the predictable outcome of choosing disposable recipes.
The analogy returns here: we are heirs who keep pawning off the family silver. We could preserve the heirloom table, polishing it for our children, but we chose the cheap desk instead. Then we’re surprised when it warps, breaks, and has to be hauled to the landfill.
The American Fixation on the Temporary
Look around at American culture, and the metaphor becomes even deeper. Homes built in the 1950s are still standing strong. Subdivisions constructed in the 2000s are already showing cracked foundations and buckling driveways. Schools built a century ago serve new generations, while schools built in the 1980s are being torn down and rebuilt. Our public works match our politics: designed to get through the next budget cycle, not to withstand the centuries.
Final Thoughts
When I pressed my hand against that centuries-old wall in Poland, I wasn’t just touching stone. I was touched by the endurance, discipline, and humility of men who built knowing they would never see the end of their work’s lifespan. It stood in sharp contrast to the crumbling highways and patched-up bridges back home.
America’s concrete reflects America’s priorities. If we want to reclaim the strength of that old Polish wall, we need to remember that building well is both a science and a moral choice. Like the cedar chest that survives generations or the wall that outlasts empires, permanence is not an accident. It is a decision.
Until we recover that lesson, our infrastructure will remain like a desk from a box store: functional today, broken tomorrow, and forgotten the next day. Meanwhile, in Poland, the heirlooms of stone and mortar will continue to stand.
