Documenting the West’s descent into Satanic receivership.
Johns Hopkins professor: ‘The Child is just a concept’
Associate Professor of History at Johns Hopkins University Jules Gill-Peterson on “The Child” as a social construct:
One of the things that childhood studies scholars make a distinction between that might be helpful is between the figure of ‘The Child’ … and actual children. And we have these sorts of ideas about childhood that are actually really powerful, and they actually condition real children’s lives. But part of the problem is that ‘The Child’ is an ideal. It’s just a concept. It’s a story. It’s wishful thinking about what we wish was true about how age is organized in our society.
Queer Theory professor and wackademic sexologist Jules Gill-Peterson says age is just a “social construct” and childhood is a concept meant to be dismantled.
— Gays Against Groomers (@againstgrmrs) September 17, 2025
He advocates for Queering Children’s Rights and claims “trans kids” break the power dynamics of gender, age and sex. pic.twitter.com/KJyLU6zG9K
Let me translate this gobbledygook for you: “Give me control over your children’s minds and genitals, bigot!”
Peterson is the author of a child tranny manifesto titled “Histories of the Transgender Child.”
Via JGillPeterson.com (emphasis added):
Jules is the author of two books. Histories of the Transgender Child (University of Minnesota Press, 2018) is the first book to shatter the myth that transgender children are a brand new generation in the twenty-first century. Uncovering a surprising archive dating from the 1920s through 1970s, Histories of the Transgender Child shows how the concept of gender relies on the medicalization of children's presumed racial plasticity*, challenging the very terms of how we talk about today's medical model.
*It’s like these people don’t even try anymore to make their slop remotely palatable to anyone not already submerged neck-deep in their lunatic subculture.
What sane person could read that phrase — “the concept of gender relies on the medicalization of children's presumed racial plasticity” — and not immediately recognize that they’re dealing with an unhinged ideologue?
Related: ‘Adult Baby’ Terrorizes Multiple Daycares With Feces
My theory is that, because they got away with the most egregious violations of common sense for so long, with anyone who even raised obvious questions smeared as a “transphobe” and expelled from their ideological echo chambers in academia and wider society, their rhetorical muscles just atrophied because they were no longer required to make a coherent argument to advance their cause.
Female ‘pastor’: I take my pre-pubescent son to drag shows so his body can be played with
Some lady in a so-called church with a tranny flag hung high behind the pulpit, in the same way a dog might pee on a fire hydrant to mark its territory, describes taking her eleven-year-old son to drag shows in order to teach him that it’s okay to have his body “played with.”
Related: WATCH: Undercover Video Exposes Pornhub’s Child-Grooming Strategy
My body, your body, their bodies are home for the living God, yes? Full of grace. Full of truth. That is why I take my eleven-year-old boy to drag shows in the summer with my friend a fellow church leader Kate and her eleven-year-old boy. I want him to know that there is no wrong way to have a body, especially if you’re a man. That bodies can be celebrated and played with. I want him to know that all bodies can shapeshift and be adorned with makeup and glitter. All bodies. I want him to know that there is no wrong way to live in his body, as long as his body is not hurting other bodies. Amen?
“That’s why I take my 11 year old to Drag Queen Shows - I want him to know it’s ok to have his Body played with”
— Concerned Citizen (@BGatesIsaPyscho) September 28, 2025
These people are legit clinically insane & are even willing to sacrifice their own Children to the cause. pic.twitter.com/1eJhcKy2Pp
(Social Justice™ people, as I and others have noted many times, have a disturbing fetish for replacing the term “person” or “human” with the term “body” — the underlying agenda, I believe, being to turn the human itself into nothing more than a conglomeration of interchangeable physical parts, to be replaced and modified at will, which is the essence of transhumanism.)
The way these degenerate fruitcakes can co-opt the language of faith and pervert it to suit their own subcultural dogma is truly shocking.
Where is God?
