Documenting the West’s descent into Satanic receivership.
Feminist academic defines 'woman' as ‘someone who has at least at one point in her life felt scared of a man’
Of all the retarded definitions of “woman” offered by transgender activists/intersectional feminists, this one takes the cake.
(Skip to 8:48 for the head-scratcher.)
“But how is childbirth a burden on women if women have testicles and no uterus, only defined as ‘someone who has at least at one point in her life felt scared of a man?” one might ask.
You’ll just have to order the book to find out.
Via Amazon (emphasis added):
In her most incendiary and controversial book to date, Clementine Ford exposes the lies used to sell marriage to women to keep them in service to men and male power. From the roots of marriage as a form of property transaction to the wedding industrial complex, Clementine Ford explains how capitalist patriarchal structures need women to believe in marriage in order to maintain control over women's agency, ambitions and freedom.
I Don't presents an inarguable case against marriage for modern women. With the incisive attention to detail and razor-sharp wit that characterises her work, Ford dissects the patriarchal history of marriage; the insidious, centuries-long marketing campaign pop culture has conducted in marriage's favour; the illusion of feminist 'choice' in regard to taking men's names; and the physical and social cost that comes with motherhood. But most importantly, Clementine Ford shows us what a different kind of world could look like for women if we were allowed to be truly free.
Related: Hillary Claims ‘Climate Change’ Killed 500,000 Last Year, ‘Particularly Pregnant Women’
Back in 2020, Clementine also took to then-Twitter to lament that “coronavirus isn’t killing men fast enough,” also suggesting in other posts that men be “fired into the sun.” In yet another, she cut to the chase and simply declared: “Kill All Men.”
Malcolm Gladwell, also an alleged academic, admits he was ‘cowed’ into co-signing trans agenda
In 2022, revered author of unspeakable prestige Malcolm Gladwell sat on a panel with a tranny named Dr. Joanna Harper.
Harper took the occasion to promote, as these people do, the transgender subversion of women’s sports, in which he declared: “If we let trans women compete in women’s sport, then we have to let them win.”
This was the moment that Malcolm Gladwell realized that the trans argument had gone to the furthest extreme and that he was ashamed that he was cowed into supporting it. pic.twitter.com/ozAONzyQTd
— Champagne Joshi (@JoshWalkos) September 5, 2025
Related: ‘Adult Baby’ Terrorizes Multiple Daycares With Feces
He now admits, three years later — once the political winds have shifted and it’s safe and self-serving to do so — that this was the moment he understood that his unquestioning support of allowing biological women to beat legacy women senseless in Olympic boxing rings was misguided.
Via New York Post (emphasis added):
Author Malcolm Gladwell admitted to being “ashamed” by his performance hosting a prominent sports conference discussing the “path forward for the inclusion” of trans athletes in women’s sports — claiming he was “cowed” by public pressure.
In a podcast released Tuesday, Gladwell, 62, lamented a 2022 MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference during which the “Outliers” author said he was “objective in a dishonest way.”
“I’m ashamed of my performance at that panel because I share your position 100 percent and I was cowed,” Gladwell told “The Real Science of Sport” host Ross Tucker, who appeared on the panel and argued against trans inclusion.
Again, he waited three years, until public opinion shifted, to ever disclose this personal revelation that was significant enough for him to remember it for such a length of time.
Profiles in courage.
It was the silent complicity of all of these people, petrified of excommunication from the liberal fold, that contributed to the social insanity of the last decade.
