A confession: I wasn’t always anti-abortion, or pro-life, or however it might be framed.
I used to be very laissez-faire about it, as a matter of fact, along with other social issues. I’m not, by nature, particularly dogmatic or religious, but I am highly skeptical of government power.
Then I learned, slowly over time, how truly deranged the people who not just tolerate but promote abortion are and have been since the birth of the modern eugenics movement led by Margaret Sanger.
Related: NPR Releases Hardcore Abortion Porn Audio to Savor on Your Morning Commute
Last year, while interviewed outside the DNC, The Daily Show co-creator insisted that, rather than being “pro-choice,” which she views as mealy-mouthed, she be referred to as “pro-abortion.” Abortion is a “moral good,” she explained.
In previous comments, she bragged that “becoming the abortion comedian is a great career move. Super lucrative, your phone never stops ringing with job offers.”
Which is undoubtedly true, given how much cash flows through the pro-abortion activism machine.
Jimmy Dore is no one’s theocrat and was historically pro-choice, but you can almost see the dark truth behind the “women’s rights” façade dawning on him in real time.I can empathize.
Related: In 2025, WebMD Claims COVID Vax ‘Still Crucial for Children’
Then came undercover video after video of abortionists casually talking shop at conferences and over dinner about dismembering babies and selling the parts for cash to scientists to do God-knows-what with.
Now, the Colorado House Speaker (a Democrat, of course) is advancing the argument that, actually, state-funded abortions are great fiscal policy because killing the babies saves cash money.If you can’t quite believe a politician would be brazen enough to frame in those stark terms, then, well, that would be understandable.
Except she said it in public, on video, from her perch in the state legislature.
Colorado House Speaker advocates for abortion because giving birth apparently costs more than killing a baby.
— Media Research Center (@theMRC) March 27, 2025
This is absolutely sickening.pic.twitter.com/EFlB09nTp9
Via The Blaze (emphasis added):
Senate Bill 183 — a consequence of Colorado voters' overwhelming support last year for Colorado Amendment 79, which set the stage for the use of public funds for abortion — passed the state Senate in a 22-12 party-line vote on March 12.
Prior to the bill passing the committee on health and human services on Tuesday, Colorado House Speaker Julie McCluskie (D), a prime sponsor of the legislation, indicated that the use of taxpayer funds to kill babies could save the state a little bit of money.
"That savings comes from the averted births that will not occur because abortions happened instead," McCluskie said in a video shared to social media. "So a birth is more expensive than an abortion — so the saving comes in Medicaid births that will not occur."
"This bill will actually decrease costs for our health care policy and financing department, our Medicaid expenditures, in both this year and out years as the savings from averted births outweigh the costs of covering reproductive health care for all Coloradans," continued McCluskie, who was endorsed last year by Planned Parenthood.
This is essentially the same argument, by the way, that the Canadian authorities used when they began promoting Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) several years ago.
Related: SHOCK Statistic: 4.1% of Deaths in Canada Due to Government Euthanasia (MAID)
Via CBC, 2017 (emphasis added):
New research suggests medically assisted dying could result in substantial savings across Canada's health-care system.
Doctor-assisted death could reduce annual health-care spending across the country by between $34.7 million and $136.8 million, according to a report published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal on Monday.
The savings exceedingly outweigh the estimated $1.5 to $14.8 million in direct costs associated with implementing medically assisted dying.
