After RFK Jr. Pledges Water Defluoridation, Propaganda Tsunami Ensues

In what is emblematic of the dozens, possibly hundreds, of articles attacking and denouncing the “anti-vaccine activist” RFK, unnamed “experts” whispering to corporate media — in all probability, the same ones who lied about the COVID shots for years — are worried that they won’t be able to drug the population with impunity anymore.

Via Washington Post (emphasis added):

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the anti-vaccine activist who is poised to have significant control over health and food safety in a potential Donald Trump administration, has promised to immediately seek to remove fluoride from drinking water in the United States. Trump, when recently asked about Kennedy’s plan, said it sounded “okay to me.”

The possible reversal of a decades-long practice that has been praised as one of the great public health achievements of the 20th century has worried some experts…

More than 200 million Americans are on fluoridated water systems, according to the CDC, and Kennedy’s focus on removing it during his long-shot bid for the presidency puzzled many experts who see little upside in the idea.

Fluoride is a naturally occurring mineral that can be found in soil, water, plants and many foods. The practice of putting fluoride in Americans’ water began in 1945 in Grand Rapids, Michigan. In 1962, the U.S. Public Health Service recommended adding small amounts to drinking water to strengthen teeth and replace minerals lost to routine wear and tear.

Related: Report: The Science™ Hid Data That Fluoride Lowers IQ

For the record, apart from numerous studies (like the one cited in the article linked above) indicating that water fluoridation does pose a significant neurological threat to children in particular, a federal court — that sacrosanct institution of the judiciary we are otherwise instructed to respect at all times — found the same and explicitly instructed the EPA to act accordingly, instructions which have thus far gone unheeded by The Science™.

Via the Northern District of California court ruling (emphasis added):

The issue before this Court is whether the Plaintiffs have established by a preponderance of the evidence that the fluoridation of drinking water at levels typical in the United States poses an unreasonable risk of injury to health of the public within the meaning of Amended TSCA.  For the reasons set forth below, the Court so finds.   Specifically, the Court finds that fluoridation of water at 0.7 milligrams per liter (“mg/L”) – the level presently considered “optimal” in the United States – poses an unreasonable risk of reduced IQ in children.  It should be noted that this finding does not conclude with certainty that fluoridated water is injurious to public health; rather, as required by the Amended TSCA, the Court finds there is an unreasonable risk of such injury, a risk sufficient to require the EPA to engage with a regulatory response.  This order does not dictate precisely what that response must be.  Amended TSCA leaves that decision in the first instance to the EPA.  One thing the EPA cannot do, however, in the face of this Court’s finding, is to ignore that risk.

Related: MASSIVE Academic, Scientific Fraud Exposed

“If you are very concerned that RFK is going to restrict fluoridation of public drinking water supplies, you can always ask your doctor for fluoride pills, and then leave everyone else alone,” wrote one X user.

This is absolutely the correct policy position: if the NPCs who follow The Science™ genuinely believe in the miracle prophylactic power of an industrial waste byproduct, they are free to purchase it legally and go to town on their own drinking water. But they don’t get to force-medicate the entire nation because they believe in pseudoscience — doing so, in fact, is a fundamental violation of informed consent.