If the social engineers didn’t have Equity™, Diversion™, and Inclusion™ to cloak their various technocratic schemes in, they’d be at a total loss to sell them.
You might be familiar with the concept of a global World Health Organization (WHO) “pandemic treaty,” currently in the “negotiation” (arm-twisting) phase as various nation-states are threatened to get on board with the program.
Related: Croatian MEP: Time to Declare WHO a Terrorist Organization
Via Politico:
A huge global effort to draw up rules around who does what in the event of another pandemic is floundering as memories of COVID-19 fade, raising a real possibility that talks will break down and leave the world as unprepared as it was in 2020.”
One of the snags in the negotiation process appears to be the “access and benefit sharing mechanism” in the name of Equity™, as explained via Politico:
“The idea is modelled after the WHO’s pandemic influenza preparedness framework, where countries share samples of circulating influenza viruses with pandemic potential, which can then be used by the pharmaceutical industry to produce vaccines. In turn, industry donates cash into a pot that is used to improve countries' preparedness and response capacity.
For lower income countries, this mechanism is a “very important centerpiece” of the treaty, said the first diplomat. “What happened during the COVID-19 pandemic is that many countries shared both pathogen samples and also genetic sequence data, and then they didn't get the benefits. That was a lesson that everybody took from that.”
In other words, national governments would be compelled to provide their epidemiological tracking data obtained through (arguably illegal in the United States under Fourth Amendment protections and certainly unethical universally) bio-surveillance to the WHO, which would then be funneled to the pharmaceutical industry (the two being functionally the same entity). In exchange, poor countries would be treated to either free or reduced-cost “vaccines” and other such alleged therapeutics produced using that information.
And it’s all, as Politico explains further, for Equity™.
Continuing:
The pandemic treaty, currently being negotiated through the World Health Organization (WHO), aims to prepare for the next global health emergency and prevent a repeat of what South Africa called “vaccine apartheid,”* where countries had vastly unequal access to COVID vaccines and drugs.
It's meant to be a legally binding agreement that commits countries to monitor pandemic threats, beefs up their capacity to respond and sets out what nations would receive in return for sharing information on any disease-causing viruses or bacteria that they discover…
A guiding principle for the agreement is the notion of equity, a concept notably lacking during the COVID-19 pandemic. This idea helped to get low- and middle-income countries on board with the idea of a pandemic treaty in the first place — and it’s now proving to be a red line.
*The Social Justice™ left, it has been noted many times, always accuses its opponents of engaging in improprieties that it engages in itself. In this case, the WHO is decrying “vaccine apartheid” — despite the fact that it was widely reported the poor populations of Africa didn’t want the vaccines, which sat unused on shelves for months until they expired, having been the subject of Bill Gates’ medical experimentation for years.
In reality, of course, the real “vaccine apartheid” was the near total de-personing of the “unvaccinated,” who were ritually dehumanized, ostracized, and made to pay various civil and criminal penalties for exercising bodily autonomy — “my body, my choice” being another alleged cornerstone of Social Justice™ ideology that goes out the window as soon as it becomes an inconvenient talking point.
