Get PJ Media on your Apple


It’s Obama Who Sucks at Midterms

March 24th, 2014 - 3:12 pm

A gentle reminder from Charles W. Cook:

As ever, Obama’s steadfast refusal to examine the real causes of his predicament is serving him poorly. Were one to construct a back-of-the-envelope summary of Bill Clinton’s tenure, one would almost certainly focus in on his two midterm judgments, which were so different from one another as to beggar belief. In 1994, Clinton’s Democrats suffered a spectacular defeat, losing 54 seats in the House and eight seats in the Senate — and thus relinquishing control of both bodies. In 1998, by contrast, the party actually gained, severely disappointing Republicans who had hoped that a combination of the Lewinsky scandal and the alleged “six-year itch” would deliver them a victory. Four years after their historic “revolution” appeared to have spiked Clinton’s agenda, the Republican party became the first opposition outfit since 1934 to fail to pick up seats in a midterm, and the first since 1822 to fail to do so in a president’s second administration.

What happened in the meantime? Did the levels of toxicity vary dramatically between the two plebiscites? Was the Constitution amended to keep Republicans at home during the latter cycle? Or did Bill Clinton merely change and adapt? Evidently, it was the lattermost. In the first two years of his presidency, Clinton had tried to push a vast and unpopular health-care bill, he had signed a tax increase, and he had heralded a dramatic gun-control bill — the dangers of which he had underestimated considerably. In response to these measures, the people rebelled, taking control of Congress away from his party. By 1998, Clinton had gotten the message. He moved to the right, signed welfare reform, and even declared the era of Big Government to be over. Most importantly, the economy was booming. Despite the personal scandal that had eroded trust, he and his party were rewarded for his malleability.

Americans love that stuff, but we’re not going to get it — especially the booming economy — from Professor Ditherton Wiggleroom. His foreign policy might be warm Silly Putty set on a foundation of quicksand, but his domestic policy is forever on Full Crony Collectivism Ahead.

Comments are closed.

All Comments   (4)
All Comments   (4)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
Nobody ever, for a millisecond, thought Bill Clinton would pop champagne corks at the destruction of the US. Can you say the same for King Barry?
43 weeks ago
43 weeks ago Link To Comment
I think the people's rebellions 1994 and 1010 shows the wisdom of having the whole house turn over every two years. It serves as a relief valve. (Unfortunately, it is not always positive - we had the horrors of the 1974 Watergate congress.)

By contrast, when something like that happened here in Israel - a Prime Minister tried to pass a revolutionary policy and ignored all protests, we had no such relief valve. I think if we had, Yitzchak Rabin would not have been assassinated.
44 weeks ago
44 weeks ago Link To Comment
Point well taken.

But if I were your editor, I would nip that headline at 4 words.
44 weeks ago
44 weeks ago Link To Comment
I'm sure Steven agrees. :-)
44 weeks ago
44 weeks ago Link To Comment
View All