Get PJ Media on your Apple

The PJ Tatler

by
Bridget Johnson

Bio

March 22, 2013 - 11:39 am

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) today introduced a budget he says will balance the budget in five years with $2.3 trillion in tax cuts.

Paul’s “Platform to Revitalize America” brings spending below the historical average of 19.1 percent of GDP in the first year and spends $9.6 trillion less over the next 10 years based on the current Congressional Budget Office baseline. It achieves a $17 billion surplus in FY2018 and reforms entitlement programs — Medicare recipients, for example, would receive the same healthcare plan as members of Congress.

It replenishes $126 billion to the Defense Department stripped in sequestration and puts an annual cap on foreign aid at $5 billion. The plan also repeals ObamaCare and Dodd Frank.

Paul’s budget kills four government agencies: the departments of Commerce, Education, Housing and Urban Development, and Energy. It also privatizes the Transportation Security Administration.

“Washington has a serious and reckless spending problem that must be re-evaluated. American families across the country are required to live by a budget and Congress should be no different – every taxpayer dollar needs to be spent more wisely. Therefore, I am offering a plan that will address this country’s looming debt crisis in a truly timely manner – balancing the budget in just five years,” Paul said. “The time has come for a change that will restore fiscal order in this country, and I will do everything in my power to ensure that this happens.”

His budget includes a flat tax and lifts barriers to domestic energy exploration and production.

UPDATE: Late this evening the Senate voted on Paul’s budget as an amendment to the continuing resolution. It failed 18-81.

Bridget Johnson is a career journalist whose news articles and opinion columns have run in dozens of news outlets across the globe. Bridget first came to Washington to be online editor at The Hill, where she wrote The World from The Hill column on foreign policy. Previously she was an opinion writer and editorial board member at the Rocky Mountain News and nation/world news columnist at the Los Angeles Daily News. She has contributed to USA Today, The Wall Street Journal, National Review Online, Politico and more, and has myriad television and radio credits as a commentator. Bridget is Washington Editor for PJ Media.
Top Rated Comments   
Every once in a while the sunrise in my eastern windows is just about perfect.
Every once in a while someone shows a royal straight flush.I voted for
President Reagan twice,and knew i was <a href="http://right.Just/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">right.Just</a> got that old feeling again! Beware <a href="http://Mr.Paul,both/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Mr.Paul,both</a> sides fear a clear thinking man.
Every once in a while the sunrise in my eastern windows is just about perfect.
Every once in a while someone shows a royal straight flush.I voted for
President Reagan twice,and knew i was <a href="http://right.Just/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">right.Just</a> got that old feeling again! Beware <a href="http://Mr.Paul,both/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Mr.Paul,both</a> sides fear a clear thinking man.
8 weeks ago Fri Mar 22 13:37:46 PDT 2013 1
8 weeks ago Fri Mar 22 13:37:46 PDT 2013 1
Link To Comment
Reduce EPA to one office with two desks at the Dept. of Agriculture, give NOAA to the Coast Guard, give the Coast Guard to the Navy, merge Health & Human Services with NIH and sell NIH. Oh, and make cabinet secretaries into real secretaries. With a cubicle and a file cabinet. Add this to the proposal and you'll be getting somewhere. The sad thing is that Paul's budget is being portrayed as some kind of stunt. It's really a half measure.
Reduce EPA to one office with two desks at the Dept. of Agriculture, give NOAA to the Coast Guard, give the Coast Guard to the Navy, merge Health & Human Services with NIH and sell NIH. Oh, and make cabinet secretaries into real secretaries. With a cubicle and a file cabinet. Add this to the proposal and you'll be getting somewhere. The sad thing is that Paul's budget is being portrayed as some kind of stunt. It's really a half measure.
8 weeks ago Fri Mar 22 12:21:44 PDT 2013 1
8 weeks ago Fri Mar 22 12:21:44 PDT 2013 1
Link To Comment
It's a good start, but I noticed he didn't get rid of the EPA.
It's a good start, but I noticed he didn't get rid of the EPA.
8 weeks ago Fri Mar 22 12:08:50 PDT 2013 1
8 weeks ago Fri Mar 22 12:08:50 PDT 2013 1
Link To Comment
All Comments   (34)
All Comments   (34)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
U.S Senator Inhofe: Banks Never Paid Back Bailouts

Luke Rudkowski interviews U.S Senator James Inhofe about his opposition to the 700 billion dollar bank bailout in 2008 and martial law threats he received from Henry Paulson. Even though the public has been led to believe that the banks payed back this money, according to Senator Inhofe this is false and the full amount was never payed back.

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9xLGdzLdXUE" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9xLGdzLdXUE</a>
U.S Senator Inhofe: Banks Never Paid Back Bailouts

Luke Rudkowski interviews U.S Senator James Inhofe about his opposition to the 700 billion dollar bank bailout in 2008 and martial law threats he received from Henry Paulson. Even though the public has been led to believe that the banks payed back this money, according to Senator Inhofe this is false and the full amount was never payed back.

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9xLGdzLdXUE" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9xLGdzLdXUE</a>
7 weeks ago Thu Mar 28 11:03:50 PDT 2013 1
7 weeks ago Thu Mar 28 11:03:50 PDT 2013 1
Link To Comment
US to Sell $1.2 Billion in Spy Drones to South Korea Nile Bowie Posted on: December 26, 2012

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jhDuUVFxUmc&feature=player_embedded#" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jhDuUVFxUmc&feature=player_embedded#</a>!
US to Sell $1.2 Billion in Spy Drones to South Korea Nile Bowie Posted on: December 26, 2012

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jhDuUVFxUmc&feature=player_embedded#" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jhDuUVFxUmc&feature=player_embedded#</a>!
7 weeks ago Wed Mar 27 13:19:35 PDT 2013 1
7 weeks ago Wed Mar 27 13:19:35 PDT 2013 1
Link To Comment
Who can I vote for that will disestablish Department of Homeland Security?
Who can I vote for that will disestablish Department of Homeland Security?
7 weeks ago Tue Mar 26 16:00:49 PDT 2013 1
7 weeks ago Tue Mar 26 16:00:49 PDT 2013 1
Link To Comment
Hail liberty!
Hail liberty!
7 weeks ago Mon Mar 25 14:08:51 PDT 2013 1
7 weeks ago Mon Mar 25 14:08:51 PDT 2013 1
Link To Comment
dear congress, YOU ARE NOT LISTENING TO YOUR BOSSES! THAT VOTE SHOULD HAVE GONE THE OTHER WAY, 81-18. you are all a bunch of crooks with your salary increase and pork spending and cronyism. GET OUT!

dear congress, YOU ARE NOT LISTENING TO YOUR BOSSES! THAT VOTE SHOULD HAVE GONE THE OTHER WAY, 81-18. you are all a bunch of crooks with your salary increase and pork spending and cronyism. GET OUT!

7 weeks ago Mon Mar 25 07:42:27 PDT 2013 1
7 weeks ago Mon Mar 25 07:42:27 PDT 2013 1
Link To Comment
Getting rid of The Dept. of Education would be enough to get my vote and my gratitude. The others would be icing on the cake.
Getting rid of The Dept. of Education would be enough to get my vote and my gratitude. The others would be icing on the cake.
8 weeks ago Sat Mar 23 10:35:44 PDT 2013 1
8 weeks ago Sat Mar 23 10:35:44 PDT 2013 1
Link To Comment
Who are the 18 and more importantly, who are the 81? Anyone have the info or a link to it? Tried searching the senate site already.

Who are the 18 and more importantly, who are the 81? Anyone have the info or a link to it? Tried searching the senate site already.

8 weeks ago Sat Mar 23 09:28:35 PDT 2013 1
8 weeks ago Sat Mar 23 09:28:35 PDT 2013 1
Link To Comment
Here is the link to the list <a href="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&session=1&vote=00069" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&session=1&vote=00069</a>

Here is the link to the list <a href="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&session=1&vote=00069" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&session=1&vote=00069</a>

8 weeks ago Sat Mar 23 18:22:47 PDT 2013 1
8 weeks ago Sat Mar 23 18:22:47 PDT 2013 1
Link To Comment
Killing the Dept's of Housing, Commerce, Education & Energy would be a great start. What about the Environmental Protection Agency. They are a bigger wart and money sponge than the other four? We really need this kind of sanity to get government started towards real control and then we can start getting that 'limited government' kind of feeling. With these bureauracies gone, Congress needs to get the feel of taking control of their responsibilities instead of whatever they are doing now.
Killing the Dept's of Housing, Commerce, Education & Energy would be a great start. What about the Environmental Protection Agency. They are a bigger wart and money sponge than the other four? We really need this kind of sanity to get government started towards real control and then we can start getting that 'limited government' kind of feeling. With these bureauracies gone, Congress needs to get the feel of taking control of their responsibilities instead of whatever they are doing now.
8 weeks ago Sat Mar 23 09:09:10 PDT 2013 1
8 weeks ago Sat Mar 23 09:09:10 PDT 2013 1
Link To Comment
Failed 18 to 81? That means a lot of Republicans don't want to stop the spending either. But then why should they, big government benefits them also, and provides the job security that gives them benefits way above what the average citizen can expect in the private sector. It also gives our "esteemed" representatives, recession proof salaries.
Failed 18 to 81? That means a lot of Republicans don't want to stop the spending either. But then why should they, big government benefits them also, and provides the job security that gives them benefits way above what the average citizen can expect in the private sector. It also gives our "esteemed" representatives, recession proof salaries.
8 weeks ago Sat Mar 23 05:49:19 PDT 2013 1
8 weeks ago Sat Mar 23 05:49:19 PDT 2013 1
Link To Comment
Finally! The start of a viable solution to our spending problem. Let's do away with
Education while we're at it and scale down EPA and IRS. I'm with Rand!

Finally! The start of a viable solution to our spending problem. Let's do away with
Education while we're at it and scale down EPA and IRS. I'm with Rand!

8 weeks ago Fri Mar 22 20:11:19 PDT 2013 1
8 weeks ago Fri Mar 22 20:11:19 PDT 2013 1
Link To Comment
1 2 3 Next View All