Get PJ Media on your Apple

The PJ Tatler

by
Bridget Johnson

Bio

March 21, 2013 - 12:26 pm

While on his tour of the Middle East, President Obama received a bipartisan call to become more engaged in Syria and take steps to help stop the never-ending bloodshed there.

“While we are particularly disturbed by reports that chemical weapons have been used in Syria, the larger tragedy is that more than 70,000 people have already been killed in Syria. More than 1 million Syrians are living as refugees. The Syrian state is disintegrating. In short, the longer the conflict in Syria goes on, the worse its consequences are becoming. The potential use of chemical weapons only makes the case for greater action more compelling and urgent,” wrote Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin (D-Mich. ) and senior member John McCain (R-Ariz.).

“We believe there are credible options at your disposal, including limited military options, that would require neither putting U.S. troops on the ground nor acting unilaterally.”

Levin and McCain asked Obama to lead an effort “to degrade the Assad regime’s airpower” and back Turkey if attempts to establish a safe zone along Syria’s northern border. Patriot missile batteries have already been deployed to the Turkish side of the border and “could be positioned – again, with Turkey’s consent – to protect the safe zone, and doing so would be a powerful disincentive for the Assad regime’s pilots to fly in that area.” The Patriots could also help defend civilians in that region from Assad’s SCUD missile attacks, they argued.

“Second, General James Mattis, the Commander of U.S. Central Command, testified last week to the Senate Armed Services Committee that ‘a fair amount’ of Assad’s aircraft could be destroyed on the ground using precision airstrikes,” the senators continued. “Such a mission could also include Assad’s SCUD missile batteries and would not require American or allied pilots to fly into the reach of Syria’s air defenses. We urge you to work with our friends and allies, as well as regional organizations, to consider this limited option.”

Levin and McCain also asked Obama for “more robust assistance directly to vetted opposition groups.”

“We believe such assistance should include tactical intelligence and increased deliveries of food and medicine, fuel, communications equipment, medical care for the wounded, and other humanitarian assistance. To this end, establishing a safe haven inside Syria would also serve the important goal of delivering humanitarian assistance more effectively,” they wrote.

“Over the past two years that the horrific conflict in Syria has pressed on, both Syrians on the ground and key allies across the region have made clear their hope for stronger American support. We urge you to take steps to ease the suffering of the Syrian people and protect U.S. national security interests.”

Bridget Johnson is a veteran journalist whose news articles and opinion columns have run in dozens of news outlets across the globe. Bridget first came to Washington to be online editor at The Hill, where she wrote The World from The Hill column on foreign policy. Previously she was an opinion writer and editorial board member at the Rocky Mountain News and nation/world news columnist at the Los Angeles Daily News. She is an NPR contributor and has contributed to USA Today, The Wall Street Journal, National Review Online, Politico and more, and has myriad television and radio credits as a commentator. Bridget is Washington Editor for PJ Media.

Comments are closed.

All Comments   (3)
All Comments   (3)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
McCain is the worst kind of arabist - the kind who cannot learn from past mistakes. As for Levin - well, we all know about Levin. Better to sequester 100% of DOD funding rather than involve ourselves in Syria. When your enemies are busy destroying themselves, let them.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
So we're going to spend all the "savings" from sequestration? I think not. If Turkey wants to do it on it's own, fine, but I don't want to have to spend money to replace our missiles.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
" ‘a fair amount’ of Assad’s aircraft could be destroyed on the ground using precision airstrikes,” the senators continued. “Such a mission could also include Assad’s SCUD missile batteries and would not require American or allied pilots to fly into the reach of Syria’s air defenses."

Where do they think the air defense are? They're around the air bases. The mobile platforms are around the mobile SCUD launchers.

In any case, any time you send in manned air craft, you have to send in helicopters and land forces in case you need to rescue a pilot.

I despise politicians who think war is a dial that can be precisely tuned.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
View All