“Our purpose is simple: We are ready to work for Hillary to be president when she is ready to run,” Black told the Center for Public Integrity, which first noticed the filing. “When our Web site launches in a few weeks, we plan to reach out to our grass-roots networks and contributors to mobilize them to support her.”
I’ve almost been salivating at the prospect of the party of youthful diversity hitting the 2016 presidential election with an almost septuagenarian retread candidate. Perhaps we can discuss head injuries and fitness for the job while we’re at it.
If both Hillary and Crazy Joe the Wonder Veep keep making noise about 2016, it may funnel money away from dark horse candidates coming out of nowhere. As we found out in 2008, it’s difficult running against an unknown who just gets to make it up as he goes along.
Before 2016, Hillary will probably go under the knife for multiple cosmetic surgeries on her face and neck and have about 25 pounds liposuctioned out of her waist (where there is suppose to be a waist) down to her thunder thighs.
She’s gonna have to stop drinking or she’ll keep falling down.
You’ve got that right Doug. I’ve suspect for some time now that she’s been drinking heavily. She’s looking like an alcoholic and that would account for her falling episodes.When you think about it, working for and answering to Obama and doing her best to keep away from her husband, would make anyone turn to drinking.
As in the former Soviet Union, having to cope first with Obama and then with Hillary in the Oval Office will drive the entire citizenry to drink.
Conscience seared with a hot iron…
Effective anti-Hillary commercial. A clip of her “accident,” then her at the Benghazi hearing, wearing the Fresnel glasses along her little rant about “What difference does it make?!”
She’s a lunatic.
How do you like that little piece of counter-Alinsky?
Unfortunately, the GOP has proven itself incapable of winning Florida, Virginia and Ohio two election cycles in a row.
I am not brimming with confidence any GOP candidate can beat Hillary in 2016. Quite the opposite, in fact.
Who we got? Paul Ryan? Mr. Charisma? He couldn’t carry his own state.
Hillary will be a favorite n 2016. Why? The GOP can’t win Florida, Ohio and Virginia.
GOP’s only ineptitude is not being able to implement cheating-free elections in those three states.
It’s more than just the inability to win those states on the Pub candidates’ part; Bill (yes, people will be voting for him while they vote for Hillary) & Hill are the most popular pols on the national scene right now. I don’t see why that is apt to change over the course of the next 3-plus years or so between now & the next presidential election.
Who we got to beat them?
Rick Perry / Marco Rubio? I’m willing to give Perry another look. He looks the part.
Lousy in debates but who exactly can the GOP nominate who has any chance of taking
Florida, Virginia and Ohio by a large enough margin to prevent them from being stolen?
Chuck Norris – your country needs you.
The GOP is too incompetent to win a shoe full of free sand on a beach.
This lady is the most incompetent, inept, arrogant fool to ever be sec of state. Sooo this absolutely qualifies her to be president according to the libs.
She would simply be the face for a coalition.
They should make her wear a mask.
The Republicans have already lost round one with Hilary in the latest episode at the Congressional hearing on the Benghazi fiasco. No Republican showed that he or she has enough fire in the belly to take her on. They passively accepted her theatrics. The minute she repeated that she took responsibility for Benghazi there should have been an on slaught of questions demanding answers. As soon as the media sensed the weakness of the Republicans they turned their venom on them. The Republicans continue to turn the other cheek in reaction to every slander heaped on them. Unless things change radically they will lose the next Presidential election as well.
Body language of the guys asking “tough” questions was amazing. Hillary fired back, buns, uh, guns blazing, and the questioner visibly recoiled.
She has gained a few skills over the years.
The drooling sycophants, one after the other, thanking her for her million miles of travel on behalf of the country were enough to make you cry.
So much drivel, you needed wading booths.
(and yes, Hillary did cite “the video” in speechifying when the caskets of the 4 dead in Benghazi came home)
I came away with a whole new dis-respect for Congress.
Only Rand Paul hung in there with toughness and acumen. I wasn’t a fan of his, but I’m a bigger one now.
“wading booths”
boots, even
They won’t care what evil or malfeasance lurks in her past. Did they care about Obama’s past associations with the unrepentant terrorist Bill Ayers? Or having Reverend “God D-mn America” Wright as his pastor for 20 years? Or how about making up large sections of his autobiography? Spending his childhood influenced by communist radicals? Using cocaine?
Face it, if the media was able to install Obama despite all the glaring red flags in his past (and these are just the ones we know about, I’d love to see his college records) then they will have no trouble installing Hillary. All her errors on the national stage will be flushed down the memory hole, it’ll be time for her to “make history” as the first woman president, right after the first black one! The media are probably stroking themselves now just thinking about it. Don’t forget that she’ll have Billy pulling for her all the way, and for whatever reason he’s still fairly popular. The Republicans in their typical downright retarded way will think they can’t go hard on her “because she’s a woman and it’ll look bad” and instead of asking the hard questions that need to be asked they’ll let her run circles around them. We’ve seen this already in the Benghazi hearings. They’ll fold like a newspaper the second the media accuses them of being “woman haters”, and you know they will, no matter what the Republicans do or say. She’s even more of an execrable weasel than Obama is, and more intelligent in a devious nasty sort of way. With the media running cover, the Republicans will be too craven to give more than a half hearted gesture and likely let her get elected. Remember she’s already got the Sandra Fluke vote and the gimme-dat vote locked up, so that’s a good portion of the electorate right there.
She’s devious and nasty in the worst sort of way, and a committed statist through and through. In areas where Obama likely won’t get much movement (like gun bans) she’ll be far more likely to figure out a way to do a lot of real and lasting damage. As bad as it sounds, I would be overjoyed if another blood clot or something took her out of the running in the next four years. Make no mistake, she is very dangerous both politically and to the future of the country if elected. Our best hope is either a medical issue, or some so far hidden scandal coming to light that forces the 0 to throw her under the bus in a way that even the most heroic efforts of media bias will not be able to scrub away. Another possibility is that some major event happens (like another major terrorist attack, an economic collapse, Iran nuking somebody, or possibly the implementation and failure of Obamacare) that causes the Democratic party as a whole to lose so much credibility and become so hated that no donkey will stand a chance in 2016. If that happens she’ll just slither back into the shadows to await a better opportunity, although her clock is ticking so those are running out.
Long story short, barring some turn of events I have no faith in the ability of the Republican party to defeat her in 2016. Despite all the things that should disqualify her she has too many things going for her (primarily the media, her gender, and the cravenness of the Republicans) to be easily defeated. She is a very real threat and we should be watching her moves carefully and digging potholes in her future campaign trail whenever possible.
For Hillary Clinton to lose, either or both of two things must occur:
The MSM must turn on her or each other, a dicey bet, but possible if their market share continues its decline.
The MSM implodes. Soros is near the end of life’s tenure and his estate will take some sorting. It could happen.
“What difference does it make?”
That’s what Hillary yelled at last week’s “testalying” on Benghazi which provided about as much worthwhile information as an air sandwich.
“What difference does it make whether or not it was a video or 2 guys walking around deciding hey, let’s attack the American Consulate !?” (paraphrased)
(no mention in her outburst of the actual nature of the attack, AQIM “terrorists” in a well planned assault)
Nutty Joe and “opens mouth, says nothing” Hillary already competing for 2016 ? And this isn’t pathetically funny on some planet or other ?
If Hillary was to be elected President in 2016 she’d either be the oldest President since Reagan (in 1980) or the oldest President ever (I don’t want to check, sorry).
I predict that whoever the Democrats nominate in 2016, it will be somebody who nobody is talking about right now.
Hillary had a stroke, I say. It wasn’t a big one, but I suspect there will be a series of minor strokes that will become too difficult for her to hide over the next four years. But, the media are the only reason Hillary is a public figure and we should expect all Hillary all the time from them over the next four years. They think they owe her now.
The Republican’s are so whipped that by 2016 they won’t even show up for the election. The media will ignore them unless it’s to make fun of them. The main focus will be on which democrat will be elected, Hillary, Joe Biden or if the movement to do away with term limits works then it will be Obama.
If the media can wipe out and ignore all Obama’s faults the media can just ignore the entire republican party and once the constitution is dumped there won’t be any reason to uphold the Charade any longer.
The 2016 election is over,100% voter turnout with 100% of the votes. A democrat won His or her name just hasn’t been released yet.
I’ll be surprised if there is an election at all.
America got what it wanted now America gets what it deserves.
With impeccable timing, WSJ’s brilliant Dorothy Rabinowitz offers her thoughts on what it will take to win against the left in 2016:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303745304576359841146126376.html
Sounds eminently do-able to me.
Yipes! Scratch that remark about timing! So much for my old eyes and deteriorating attention to detail.
Thought I was getting today’s Rabinowitz piece, “Hillary’s Future,” and bungled my way into this one instead.
Everything else is still great advice, though!
September 11th was a gigantic, crushing defeat with consequeqnces which lasted for centuries. On that day in 1683, Prince Peter III Sobieski erupted with the Polish Cavalry from the impenetrable Vienna Woods to sweep over the Sultan’s camp to rout and destroy the Ottoman Army and eradicate the Muslim Jihad to take down Europe. September 11 in New York and DC was payback. We can count on payback every September 11, indefinitely. Anyone not expecting it is unaware of things in the world.
The nature of Jihad attacks is that the spontaneous ones are against Dhimmi fellow-citizens. Jihad attacks against foreigners or from foreign stimuli involve a lot of planning and conferencing by Imams to get it all arranged, and then the directions are reported on Friday services at the Mosques. If one has a functional intelligence system, these things appear like a coming dust storm.
Mrs. Clinton’s performance on Benghazi illustrates her grasp of the world is probably less than would be grasped from reading “Classic Comics” or a cheat sheet. New Left folks have their doctrine to inform them. Mrs. Clinton’s outburst in the hearing was a de-facto confession of profound ignorance at work.
September 11 was a catastrophe with consequences lasting through the centuries. On that day in 1683, Prince Peter III Sobieski, King of Poland, erupted from the impenetrable Vienna Woods with the Polish Cavalry onto the Sultan’s camp to rout and stampede the Ottoman Army, breaking the Siege of Vienna and ruining the Jihad to take down Europe for Allah. September 11 in New York and D.C. were payback. Expect more payback every September 11, indefinitely.
Familiarity with Jihad attacks reveals the spontaneous attacks are those against fellow-citizens which are Dhimmi or apostates of some kind. Attacks against foreigners such as embassies or over something in a foreign land such as cartoons involves a lot of consultation and conferencing by Imams beforehand to organize and coordinate the spontaneous outbursts, and then the marching orders are delivered on Fridays from the Mosques. With knowledge and a functional intelligence organization, the organized Jihad looks as spontaneous as an incoming weather system.
Mrs. Clinton’s testimony on Benghazi revealed her grasp of foreign relations with non-Western nations was not up to the level of Classic Comics or cheat sheet instructions. New Left folks have a grasp of foreign relations which is New Left, with information provided more by doctrine and Deductive reasoning than by getting involved in facts and information and trying to sort out things appearing to be in disagreement.
Her outburst was revealing. The purpose of the State Department is not to do autopsies and crime scene investigations on disasters in foreign relations. The purpose is to gather the information and relationships beforehand so that bad things can be avoided or at least anticipated.
Taking actions on the basis of Deductive reasoning doctrines instead of destruction-testing the doctrine and sorting out the information with Inductive reasoning is like driving the car according to the road map pasted onto the inside of the windshield rather than looking outside.
Bengazi, Hillary. Answer that one.
Hillary’s “3:oo am” ad along with her “What does it matter!”
and
snippets of her husband Bill talking-up Obama (as he has)
should not be very good for her.
As well, once more of the 99ers and union-used idiots feel the direct impact of Palosi’s, Obamacare “needs to get passed so that you can find out what’s in it”,
and the effect on the working-classes’ paycheck (after hearing all of that “pay your fair share” nonsence (no tax increase to the middle class -lol)
she and her party might not have much (hot)air left to fill those balloons.
Saw the documentary yesterday afternoon in a theater 30 miles south of Atlanta. Several senior and few people skipping out of work. Once the movie starts it is spellbinding. After the movie ended I felt shaky and nauseated. One guy yelled out now will everybody get out and vote.’ The women behind me said they were stunned. They didn’t have a clue who had infiltrated our government as President. Neither did I. This Obama guy’ is very, very scary and those that refuse to see the movie are even scarier. Unbiased and beautifully executed documentary. Why would any true American refuse to see it?