New Report: President Knew the Truth About Benghazi
November 17, 2012 - 7:35 am
Jennifer Rubin at the Washington Post points to this article in the Washington Guardian by John Solomon, a former Post reporter, that highlights the President’s Daily Brief (PDB) on Benghazi, revealing what the administration knew in the immediate aftermath of the Benghazi attack:
In a blockbuster report, John Solomon, the former Associated Press and Post reporter, has ferreted out the president’s daily brief that informed him within 72 hours of the Sept. 11 attack that the Benghazi attack was a jihadist operation.
Citing officials directly familiar with the information, Solomon writes in the Washington Guardian that Obama and other administration officials were told that “that the attack was likely carried out by local militia and other armed extremists sympathetic to al-Qaida in the region.”
The details from the CIA and Pentagon assessments of the killing of Ambassador Chris [Stevens] were far more specific, more detailed and more current than the unclassified talking points that UN Ambassador Susan Rice and other officials used five days after the attack to suggest to Americans that an unruly mob angry over an anti-Islamic video was to blame, officials said.
Most of the details affirming al-Qaida links were edited or excluded from the unclassified talking points used by Rice in appearances on news programs the weekend after the attack, officials confirmed Friday. Multiple agencies were involved in excising information, doing so because it revealed sources and methods, dealt with classified intercepts or involved information that was not yet fully confirmed, the officials said.
Solomon cautions that there were bits of evidence pointing to a spontaneous attack but, as Eli Lake of the Daily Beast and others have reported, he writes: “Among the early evidence cited in the briefings to the president and other senior officials were intercepts showing some of the participants were known members or supporters of Ansar al-Sharia — the al-Qaida-sympathizing militia in Libya — and the AQIM, which is a direct affiliate of al-Qaida in northern Africa, the officials said.”
How could the president and his senior staff then have allowed (or rather, sent) Rice to go out to tell an entirely different tale to the American people on Sept. 16 on five TV shows?
This report indicates that the president certainly knew that Benghazi wasn’t a rogue movie review gone bad. He had information that plainly spelled out what was later confirmed by additional intelligence. If this information was too confidential to share with the public, at the very least the president and others should not have mislead voters.
This is a full-blown scandal, and in light of this information, the press corps’s slothful indifference to uncovering the truth at Wednesday’s news conference with Obama is all the more shocking. It is time for the president to come clean. The scandal has now enveloped the Oval Office and will define his second term, if not resolved satisfactorily.
Whatever reason the administration had to cover up the involvement of terrorists in the attack — and not all of them are political — Rubin is right: the time is now for the administration to come clean.
If General Petraeus is right and the CIA talking points used by Susan Rice were altered to reflect the false claim that the anti-Muslim film was responsible for the attack, this, along with the PDB’s stressing a terrorist attack within hours of the assault, demands that the president or someone credible from the administration come forward and explain the discrepancies.
The pre-attack security measures were negligent, indeed incomprehensible. But the actions — or inactions — of the administration while our people were under fire are the sole responsibility of the commander in chief. And for that, we need a complete and honest accounting.