I am still steaming about Felipe Calderón’s presumptuous address to Congress the other day. In fact, I am steaming on two burners. One burner is labeled “presumptuous twit.” This covers the fact that a foreign politician should think it appropriate that, having been granted the honor of addressing a joint session of Congress, he should proceed to criticize Arizona’s new immigration law. When the foreign politician in question is from Mexico, whose own immigration policies are far harsher than ours, then the presumption is overlaid with a repellent cake of hypocrisy.
But the repugnant spectacle of Mexico’s president lecturing us about immigration pales before the even more repugnant spectacle of Nancy Pelosi, Joe Biden, and most of their Democratic brethren bestowing a standing ovation on Calderón for the favor of his temerity. That show of political correctness has me on a double boil.
The truth is that the Arizona law is practically identical to the federal immigration law that is on the books but is simply not enforced. The preposterous outcry against it from “liberals” who have threatened to boycott Arizona borders on the surreal. For what does the law require? As Andrew Klavan put it with his customary humor, what they’re objecting to is the outrageous effort of “trying to criminalize . . . criminality.” We wouldn’t want that, would we?
How gratifying it was to watch Representative Tom McClintock from California deliver an articulate and condign rebuke to the two-thirds of Congress who applauded — applauded! — a foreign politician who came to town to criticize them for endeavoring to secure their own borders and enforce their own laws. “The Mexican government has made it very clear for many years ,” McClintock observed, “that it holds American sovereignty in contempt and President Calderon’s behavior as a guest of the Congress confirms and underscores this attitude.”
It is highly inappropriate for the President of Mexico to lecture Americans on American immigration policy, just as it would be for Americans to lecture Mexico on its laws.
It is obvious that President Calderon does not understand the nature of America or the purpose of our immigration law.
Unlike Mexico’s immigration law — which is brutally exclusionary — the purpose of America’s law is not to keep people out. It is to assure that as people come to the United States, they do so with the intention of becoming Americans and of raising their children as Americans.
Unlike Mexico, our nation embraces immigration and what makes that possible is assimilation.
Extremely well put, Roger. If I were a Republican, I would immediately seize the issue of legal immigration and champion it, devising a program that would simplify and hasten the legalization process–for those who have earned it. Rather than being defensive about it, Republicans should rush to advocate positive reform; only then can they “criminalize criminality” without risking the alienation of an enormous voting bloc–a trap into which they have so far unfortunately fallen.
Any attempt to increase the number of work visas would be fought tooth and nail by labor unions. I’ve had some contact with (otherwise honest and hardworking) illegal aliens. From their perspective, the difficulty in obtaining a work visa means corruption (such as in their own government), and the only way around it is to pay a bribe. The coyotes offer to “expedite” the process in return for a bribe. This is how corrupt government business is done.
In some ways, their perspective is accurate.
Calderone is an insulting hypocrite– he should shut the heck up and go home.
Why would those democrats give a standing ovation as they did? Simple. They are socialists. Their allegiance is to the ideals of socialism and not to this country. When the two allegiances are in conflict in the mind of the socialist, the the ideals of socialism take precedence.
So, when they get all indignant when their patriotism is questioned, laugh at them, because that fig leaf fell apart during the time when they stabbed our country in the back during the Iraq war.
Yes, I consider myself a libertarian, by my allegiance is to this country first, to ideology second.
First things FIRST, Everything Else NOT First!
No more of this ‘Comprehensive’ mantra. Most people have figured out that whenever congress does anything “Comprehensive” we the people are going to get all of the HENSIVE, and none of the Compri.
In other words, SECURE THE BORDER FIRST.
Worry about everything else later.
These idiot Democrats hate America so much they will do anything to destroy it. Calderon wants open borders because he cant control the crime. Obama also wants them for the illegal votes the Democrats get. It is funny to me Obama doesnt want to control the borders but Seniors at a high school in Kalamazoo,Michigan must produce a birth certificate (which Obama himself wont do),a social security card and proof of citizenship before they can shake is hand. Elitism rules the day and American Law and Order has become secondary to the elites.
Demo-rats– party of Marx and Jane Fonda!
Calderón. What a cabrón! What is enraging is that in Mexico it is illegal for foreigners to participate in anything political but he feels perfectly free to try to have an influence on our domestic policies. Not only are Mexico’s immigration laws brutaly exclusionary but just visiting can turn into a nightmare. If you are in a car accident, everyone gets taken to jail until liablity is determined. If you don’t have Mexican liability insurance you’ll be prevented from leaving the country even if you need medical care and good luck getting anything more than minimal medical care in their jails. Good luck getting enough to eat or getting enough money together to pay other prisoners for ‘protection’. The US may not be perfect but we make more than an effort to be better. Not just better than other countries, but better than our own past, better than our present. The only thing Mexico seems to be getting better at is organized crime, corruption and poverty. That is why he is against our immigration laws. It puts a damper on his top three exports.
Well we know our enemy for sure. What are we going to do about em ??
Three observations:
1. Calderon, a corrupt politician if there ever was one, does not know what he is talking about. He hasn’t read the Arizona law.
2. The Supreme Court has upheld the right of Federal officers to ask anyone for any reason about their immigration status. See: http://countercultureconservative.wordpress.com/tag/arizona-immigration-law-megyn-kelly-megan-fox-news-bill-oreilly-federal-law-analysis-analyses/
3. Mexico, through what Calderon calls “migration,” has been exporting it’s underclass to us for deacdes. Mexico is racist; the Spanish elite is sending its troublesome indigenous people to us.
And a question:
In hauling Calderon before Congress, could the Left be leading us down a “global” path? Will we now invite on a regular basis the leaders of other countries to speak before our lawmakers?
Calderone does not know whereof he speaks, T/F. I think he does know. All of his applauders are leftist with a strategy to push and they really push. They understand that it is strategy as opposed to truth and they all give more than lip service to that strategy.
According to my wife, who was born in Mexico, Calderone is Godfather to the son of leader of Mexico’s biggest drug cartel.
YES! And I immediately sent representative McClintock an e-mail of thanks and congratulating him on being an HONORABLE American. I’d like to suggest many others do the same.
It would be interesting to have a list of all the anal probes in Congress that cheered this ” guest” in our capitol. This rude, useless, dishonest President of a failed Nation should do everyone a favor and go home and shoot himself.
My mind keeps going back to the axiom that a nation gets the leadership it deserves.
If Americans don’t want some creep invited to address Congress, then don’t elect creeps to represent our country.
The math is simple. Garbage in equals garbage out.
If nothing else voters should think about the lousy smell before casting their votes come 2010 and 2012.
Good thought, poor illustration. Bad oats may make the horse sick but it will not make the compost sick. We need to disabuse ourselves of what these ___s actually believe and what they say they believe. No crooked salesman believes his own pitch which he knows is not true.
Massive immigration of semi-literate and illiterate peasants from 3rd world countries is a means to an end for the Democrats. It helps them toward their goal of total state control, toward socialism. They don’t give a dam* about the illegals themselves, just their votes. That the majority of Americans, Democrats especially, can’t see this is astounding. The Democrats are determined to destroy liberty, capitalism, and the United States as it was founded.
The speech Calderon gave could not have been better written than if one of the cartels had written it themselves. It is a blueprint for allowing unfettered access to the US and expanded ability for these cartels to sow fear and corruption in the US just as they have in Mexico.
Maybe law abiding Mexicans can not be trusted to protect themselves. In America all statistics prove that armed law abiding citizens are safer and happier in that safety than institutionalized victim hood forced on those who have been disarmed.
Calderon lied on every point of his speech. Take the guns confiscated in Mexico. 10% were sent to the US. Only the 10% they were sure were from America and only 80% of that meager lot were from the US. That seems to put the total American guns seized by Mexico at less than 10%.
If Mexico has all the solutions then why are they in the situation they find themselves in today.
As for the Democrats in congress, their drooling adulation says much about them, all of it pathetic.
Polls show Congressman McClintock represents a large majority of the American people. Time to get rid of Pelosi, Reid and every congressman and senator who applauded Calderon’s disgraceful speech. Oh, and time also to ride ourselves of 12 million illegal aliens who came her without permission of the American people.
Tom McClintock has been speaking words from “God’s mouth to his lips” for years. He challenged Arnold for governor at the time of Gray Davis’ recall in 2003. Many committed conservatives pulled the lever for Schwarzenegger simply to insure a “Republican” would be elected. The Democrat candidate was Lt. Governor Cruz Bustamante, a radical progressive committed to “reclaiming the Northern Lands” for Mexico through the La Raza Group.
Underfunded and facing the movie top box office king was an uphill struggle from the beginning for McClintock. Still, he polled 13% denying Arnold a majority plebiscite.
One can only imagine how California would have turned out had McClintock taken the governor’s chair in 2003. Even with the dysfunctional assembly and union controlled lobbies, I have to believe that the Golden State would not be as tarnished as we find today.
I wasn’t surprised that McClintock took the lead in his condemnation of Calderon. Republicans should listen to plain spoken conservatives like McClintock and Chris Case of New Jersey. The public is starving for the truth, and the truth is that Calderon and Obama are bogus in their denunciation of the Arizona law.
Calderon you’re a joke. Stay home. It is beyond blelief that you to come here and try to dictate how we should treat illegals when you have one of the worst human rights abuse in the world. Take care of your own country and stay out of ours. Your citizens are much better off in Arizona as illegals than they are as citizens in Mexico. Fix yourself and leave us alone.
The founding fathers would have every congressman who applauded this turd strung up for treason.
It’s getting to the point where many formerly sane people would be just in calling for blood in the halls of congress.
That’s exactly right, why can’t we recognize what this is immediately and use the word even- that word is T-R-E-A-S-O-N.
We really do need a list of everyone who stood up to show their true colors. Thank you, Roger for being the voice of reason and highlighting McClintock’s speech.
When you think about it,Chaz,this movement has always represented a foreign set of rules. It is always selfish and self-centered. Not so mich in what it believes but in what it blinds the rest of us with. Back in the 1870s, some 150 years ago, feelings were running high as Lenin flooded the area where my grandfather was raised in SE Ohio. The message has always been der revolution under Lenin, under Trotsky,who may have fathered La Raza, under Stalin and Mao and Castro and Chavez. There has only been one strategy and one aim. In practice that aim has ravaged Africa. Calderon stated that stretegy clearly before our foreign houxd of representatives and Senators right along with our current administration who gave a standing ovation to das revolution. There is no thought of a profit or property rights in that ovation. This is not stupidity but strategy. It requires a profit to create jobs and it requires property rights to secure that profit. We must call it what it is and not what it masquerades to be. There is no foundation of Truth in support of their stance, yet they declare that is what we all want. La Voz de Aztlan declares “Una gota de verdad valle mas de un mar de mentiras.” One drop of truth is worth more than a sea of lies. Verdad but in their context there is no truth to compare their propaganda with fact. Such are the words of Calderon.
yes. and, the founding fathers would also be mystified as to why this corrupt, inept, piece of dung was being feted in the first place.
I love what happened to Mrs. Obama at that grade school. Word has now come from the Fed., there will not be any investigation. This child and her illegal family are safe. Hurray America! Doesn’t that make you feel better? A little more welfare please, free school lunches…breakfast, busing, and subsidized housing and that doesn’t mention all the other resources being used to support this child and her family.
The reason California is broke and broken is exactly this situation played out millions of times. The rest of America, you are next. Thank you Mr. and Mrs. Obama!
Totally correct, Roger.
btw, McClintock endorses both Poizner & Devore, which reinforces my personal judgement for us Californians.
dittos
Calderon’s speech and the standing ovation he received from Congress should be the centerpiece for the campaign materials of every conservative running for office from U.S. Senate to county recorder. The only word that comes close to describing the event is “squalid.” The Democrats are clearly nerving themselves to declare a blanket amnesty for (Mexican) illegals in the U.S. and cash in the ten to fifteen million instant votes they expect this to yield. If the Republicans had anything more than tapioca in their backbones they would have walked out during Calderon’s speech and issued an immediate public pronouncement that the Obama administration is now willing to let the leader of one of the hemisphere’s most corrupt and mismanaged nations dictate our internal immigration policy. It is gratifying to see Rep. McClintock’s response but this looks like a case of too little and too late.
The Jackass Party is composed of people who love evil and support every sort of iniquity. Pelosiites and Reidians. Obamakrooks and Frankiipoos delight in filth and hatred. Their plan is to fill the US with latinos, because latinos vote leftwing. Then, with their power base assured forever,(latinos in the majority), they will, behind the scenes, begin an hispanic genocide. In the end, they intend to kill everyone but themselves.
Satan has always hated mankind. Jesus died to save mankind. Why, then, will some choose to side with Satan?
When you believe and serve a lie don’t expect any gratitude. There is no compassion where this lie comes from and the people pushing it expect to gain. If you are stupid enough to buy their bull you are too stupid to get their respect. Heads I win, tails you lose. Separate strategy from belief.
ok, McClintock, now tell the O that this same principle applies to him and Israel.
Check out Rep. McClintock’s full remarks here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ldx8gZDwZWs
“He gave a terrific speech: to the point, well informed, and supremely relevant.”
Note, too, the timing of his speech. McClintock was responding to the speech the same day. He didn’t have to go home and think about it. He knew. He didn’t have to go and consult with a speech writer. He knew what to say and he said it.
If only all California’s politicians were like him!
You really need to read this article on The Trashing of Arizona and see from the pictures what the folks in that state are having to put up with. http://www.marstonchronicles.info/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=490&Itemid=1337.
In Mexico the political leaders are paid off by the narcotrificantes. With Calderon’s visit and address to congress, should we have the impression that 2/3 of our congress is now being funded by los narcos?
don’t forget the standing ovation.
The reason millions of people come to the U.S. illegally is because the admission process is difficult, slow and prohibitive. It’s practically impossible to meet the requirements for millions of desperate people who want to get a job and improve their lives at a place where demand for workers is higher than their own country.
Did you know that one of the requirements is a job offer from a U.S. employer? How can you get that being at another country? Employers don’t have recruiting offices in other countries, except for large corporations who mainly hire highly trained people. People can get a job only when interviewing face-to-face. That’s why they come here illegally.
You try and get a job in Europe or your dream country . . .
Tough shit.
For those who wish to come here there is a process. Until that process changes it is what it is – it is the law. Once someone crosses the border into this country they’ve broken laws – and committing a criminal act in that process.
Ergo – all illegal aliens are criminals.
You cannot pick and choose which laws you wish to enforce ignore lawbreakers – otherwise we become a nation without laws. That is unacceptable.
What part of this is so difficult for you to understand?
I may be hard of hearing but you are hard of thinking.
If you knew how to read, you’d realize that I provided an explanation, not a justification.
Then there is the Obama process. Let anyone in or grant them immediate citizenship if they will vote for the socialists, oh I mean democrats.
Personal friend murdered by a Haitian granted immediate citizenship due to the earthquake. He asked her for sex, she said no, he shot her in the head.
Immigration did not check this man at all. Now he is waiting trial on our dime. He loves this administration because they gave him a chance for three square meals a day and cable.
What’s your point? Ever since the development of the modern nation-state one of the powers inherent in any national government is the right to determine the rules of entry and the right to exclude those who evade such rules.
You also say…”It’s practically impossible to meet the (immigration) requirements for millions of desperate people who want to get a job and improve their lives at a place where demand at a place where demand for workers is higher than their own country.” That may be true but when did it become an inherent responsibility of Nation A to provide employment to the citizens of Nation B? Isn’t it the responsibility of the government of Nation B to provide the conditions for economic development and prosperity for their own people? And if they fail in this, shouldn’t the citizens of Nation B properly hold their own government accountable rather than blaming Nation A for not admitting them en masse?
Let’s put it in more concrete terms. If, for whatever reason, millions of Californians decided to flee the collapsing economics of that state for a fresh start in British Columbia, Canada, would the Canadian government be justified in trying to stop them? After all Canada has only one-tenth the population of the U.S. and is rich in undeveloped resources. It also has one of the most exacting and rigidly-enforced immigration entry systems in the world. Should that system be relaxed simply because millions of badly-governed Golden Staters need jobs?
Read my answer to K.T.
Sorry – That’s not good enough. What we are talking about is not the motivation of those who illegally cross national borders but the legal justification for taking action against them. If such a nation has the legal basis to take such action then the motivation of those seeking to illegal entry is irrelevant. Just answer one question. Does the U.S. have the right to enforce the security of it’s borders and the process that provides for legal immigration? If we do then you have to accept that action against Mexican illegals is justified regardless of their motivation. If not then we should open the check-points and say “come on in.” That is the real problem with the proposed Arizona law. It is, in effect, putting the issue in these very concrete terms and everyone on the Left is frantically trying to find a way of avoiding it.
I’m not going to waste my time with someone who won’t understand what I write.
I know dozens of people who have done it.
Do the math: dozens (who could) vs. millions (who couldn’t)
That’s a pretty pathetic response.
If it can be done by my acquaintances, there is no excuse for the rest not going through the process.
The masses are not as well-connected, educated and affluent as your acquaintances. Again, I’m not justifying their actions, just stating the facts.
Nepotism works well with illegal immigration. If you have relatives already living in the USA, your support is greater than if you don’t. Just take a look in Chinatown (NY, SF, LA), the Jewish enclaves, the Russian ghettos, and the Latino settlements. Plus add the job the Coyotes do.
Vivo is simply trying to justify illegal immigration and lax federal border control without coming out and saying, “I’m in favor of lax federal border control because I like illegal immigration.”
This is a variation on the “but” tactic the Left has employed for years. You know: “I’m in favor of enforcing the immigration laws, but…” or, “I support our troops in the field and wish them every success, but…” or “I really don’t think the Oval Office is the right place to be banging an intern, but…”
Robert A. Heinlein suggested that the proper punctuation for such a sentence is a firm period placed immediately after the “but,” whether the speaker wants one there or not. “Don’t use excessive force in supplying such a moron with such a period,” he continued. “Cutting his throat brings only a momentary pleasure, and is sure to get you talked about.”
It’s funny how conservatives argue their case by putting the wrong words and concepts in the mouth of the ‘adversary’. There must be a reactionary training camp somewhere. It’s like a cookie cutter. And then you wonder why many people just ignore you and move on to less disturbing environments.
“But Mr. Policeman, you can’t give me a ticket for parking in a yellow line, there’s nowhere else to park.”
“But Mr. Judge, I had to rob the bank, I don’t have a job and need the money.”
“But Sir, I had to rape her, she didn’t want to go out with me.”
“Oh! I had to come here illegally, the legal way is sooooo complicated.”
It is not supposed to be easy to enter the US. Immigrants are supposed to enhance our nation and be able to contribute to society. It may not seem fair to all, but with our country going belly up because of entitlement programs and unemployment, we cannot afford to be philanthropists at present. When the economy improves, then we can look at being kind and considerate to the world’s outcasts.
The reason millions of people come to the U.S. illegally is because they have crossed our borders ILLEGALLY or have remained in the country ILLEGALLY, becoming in the event ILLEGAL ALIENS.
Wonder what he’d say if NO AMERICAN’S went to Mexico.. How long that country would last….
What if we were to ban the sending of money to Mexico?
People would immediately come up with creative ways to do it, depriving Bank of America and thousands of money-forwarding businesses of millions of dollars in fees that are spent in the USA. Mother Theresa would be proud of your idea . . .
One of these days a liberal will argue in good faith.
Today apparently, is not that day.
Is Tom McClintock the new leader of the refounding fathers? Very good possibility.
As for the Demo traitors, why do they hate themselves, why are they self-loathing, and why do they allow their American hating psychosis to control their lives and votes?
Anyone of our elected representitives who applauded the Mexican piece of offal should cry in shame for forsaking their country and beg forgiveness of their countrymen.
{IF} The voices of Calderon and Obama were the same it would be hard to tell who dislikes America the most .
After all Obama has in 37 speeches put America down all over the world even in front of thugs , dictators and Murders .
This is The first ever by any President .
Obama has not only awoken “”We ” asleep Americans .He has light a fire under our Butts .
We took our Vast Freedoms fore granted Obama is dead set on destroying .That is not Socialism …… it is Stalinist pure Communism .
In Judo we have a highly technical Throw called Uchi Matta …..
You throw yourself …. I just help you over after setting you up …… taking me for granted Obama is now a two way street .
One Ippon for America
“It is obvious that President Calderon does not understand the nature of America or the purpose of our immigration law.”
I do not find this an obvious fact. I think he does understand, and quite well at that. We are dealing with liars so should not expect them to champion the truth.
Teddy Roosevelt was speaking of something quite different. Up till and after WW II that was a true assessment but after WW II and the cold war it was no longer true. The fifth column has a long and consistent history. La Voz de Aztlan is quite consistent but a long ways from being a reliable source of information, taken at face value. It is not the only site in its class but, if you shook them all out and dumped them in the dark it would make little difference whose site you chose.
“Unlike Mexico, our nation embraces immigration and what makes that possible is assimilation.” At one time this was very true but not any more. The immigrant is likely to be poor and ignorant, a promising target for leftish propaganda and raceism but not the strengthening power of truth. There are many well oiled sites like La Voz de Aztlan and La Raza that are rabble rousers with raising rabble being their main strategy.
Most of these illegal immigrants are Mexican due to the poverty and proximity of Mexico, not because they are of native indian ancestry. I do no reject them because they are latino or Mexican but because they are illegal and it is the actual criminal element that we are protecting with all our racism, not the poverty stricken chicano trying to find a bite of bread. Both Obama and Calderon know this but stand on their feet to applaud one another. This is not an attempt to find a solution but to further their own agenda. Therefore, their strategy has no foundation and should not be treated as though it does. If there is any error it is in calling strategy policy. We must reject what these Socialist are pushing and revert to the things that made America Americans and not just groups of English, French, Spanish, indian, and all other people who have found their way to our shores. We must restore our rights to personal property justly gained through hard work and the service it provides, paid to the earner as a profit on his time and effort. The successful will hire help and the hired help will spend his earning which belong to him and not to us.
My grandfather has told me, growing up is southeastern Ohio in the 1860-70s that Lenin was flooding his area with their doctrines and feelings were running pretty high, Lenin was Bolshevik and was pushing der revolushun. He was not American in any sense of the word. Yet we have allowed Socialism with its contrived propaganda rob us of our rights. Those now in power in Washington have far more in common with Vladimir Lenin than they have with Thomas Jefferson or George Washington. Incidentally, my great great grandfather, William Tilton was born in Main in July of 1790 and George Washington was serving his first term. I have a smidgin of first hand information.
I was hoping Obama would ask for the $1.3 billion Bush gave Calderon to ‘enforce their border and fight the drug cartel’.. hahahahahahahaha
The Congressmen/ Congresswomen who clapped for this a sshat should be forced to eat street vendor food from Mexico with no T P at the avail…
I fully support this rep’s right to speak his opinion. Just as long as he keeps it in the house. He is no danger to U.S. foreign policy speaking out as a representative from his district and I am sure that his district is solidly anti-mexican anyway so this tactic should ensure his re-election by a comfortable margin. Good Luck to him.
Cute.
Ah, my old friend Poor Folk, the sly dog: “He is no danger to U.S. foreign policy speaking out as a representative from his district and I am sure that his district is solidly anti-mexican anyway so this tactic should ensure his re-election by a comfortable margin. Good Luck to him.”
But, Poor Folk, McClintock and his district aren’t anti-Mexican like, oh like Presidente Cabron (Cabron I sez) is anti-American. No no, McClintock is anti-Mexican invader. Big, clear difference that the unscrupulous libuls always pretend they don’t get.
What a typical liberal.
He disagrees with me, therefore he is a racist.
He used to attack directly and viciously a la BC and Mr. skuzneck. Now he tries to be, but fails, the voice of reason. He fails because the reason part always contains the librul cancer.
I thank Tom McClintock for speaking for those of us who love this country who are offended daily by the actions of the current administration who clearly despise everything we stand for.
Note this: Calderon would never have given a speech like this if Obama had not cleared it first. Obama has never been a friend to America, I wish it wasn’t so, but it is. One only needs to look at the education he received, secular and religious and behold an arrogant man Child trying to act Presidential. Obama is now ignoring through ICE the AZ. law. We can do the same with his Health Bill Law. It is unconstitutional ! Two can play this game !
I have read the Arizona law. Much of it existed before the ‘controversial’ recent updates. While not an attorney, there are certain points which seem clear:
• It creates state pre-emption over cities’ ‘sanctuary’ laws, banning them.
• It cracks down on human trafficking.
• It enables citizens to sue municipalities and other goverment agencies which continue to aid and abet illegal aliens via sanctuary policies.
• It makes it illegal to solicit work if one is an illegal alien.
• It makes it illegal to knowingly hire illegal aliens, with employer protection against entrapment.
I hope we enact something similar here in Texas. Read it yourself at http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/bills/sb1070s.pdf
El Senior Calderon, tu es un cabron!!
If my Spanish isn’t very good, please know I learned it (what little I recall) 49 years ago.
With each passing day, the President of the United States evidences his lack of
understanding and indeed, his disregard of the duties of his office. President
Obama has been elected to the presidency of the United States, a constitutional
office, with duties defined in the United States Constitution which also
makes it abundantly clear that the United States is a republic, not a dictatorship
and not a monarchy. The President sees himself as the final and only word on
everything. Congress and the judiciary exist, in his mind, only to do his
bidding.
Hmm, ‘no immigration without assimilation’ hardly fits the multiculti balkanization bill, does it? The agenda is to erase the borders and establish islets of cultures in a morally neutral ocean of statism, preferably under the auspices of a world government. That’s the utopian narrative we’re up against.
Baal, that’s precisely right. Americans need to get it through their addled brains that the modern democratic party hates America as constructed, it hates we who defend its construction, and will ally itself with anyone – militant jihadist fanatics, iranian delusionals, worthless mexican criminals – who feels as they do and can help finish us off.
And I don’t mean ‘some’ in the democratic party. I mean all of them, down to the last, wormiest piece of cheese in the bureaucracy.
Quite right. Democrats don’t even like the SHAPE of this country.
I’m in complete agreement with Roger’s piece. Only suggestion I would make is to save some anger for Obama and the Dem majority for making that entire disgusting show possible by inviting Cabron to come here and take a dump.
I doubt that the so-called ‘financial reform’ bills recently passed by our Democratic Congress will be enforced either…it’s all about appearances…to get re-elected…to stay in power…and to disburse said power, along with other people’s money, throughout the patronage network.
McClintock is a damn sight more diplomatic than I would have been. Filipe should have been dragged out by his ear and had the crap beat out of him.
I think the biggest mistake being made here is for the American people to quit ignoring the fact that no matter which of the 2 political parties happen to be in power, the country is run by drug dealers. Illegal and legal. Keeping the population stoned keeps them in a state of care free bliss, their only concern being the money to buy their next hit and the next hit. Drugs and booze are turning the USA and Canada into feminist states.
It’s comical posters such as vivo are badmouthing BofA nowadays.
This is the same BofA that routinely donated money to ‘hispanic organizationa’, ‘La Raza’ for example. Within the last year or so them giving 1 million smackers to La Raza. and looked the other way when providing home loans to illegal aliens. Take a look at CA, AZ and NV to prove that point.
But hey, deflection, spin and empathy is your way.
BofA 2009 revenues were $150 billion. A $1 million donation here is like giving you 0.07 of a penny.
BofA donates money to influence and attract targeted customers. They want to attract the millions of dollars shipped out of the USA. Business is business.
You call exposing the facts ‘badmouthing’?
Please take a loan or a grant from BofA to take a college course in ‘How to find the truth and state the facts’.
Secondly, you sure as *hit can get a job in another country without a vis-a-vis encounter.
The Northern European theater is ripe for the picking, bub. Though Norway, Sweden through my experience is extremly expensive.
There’s a myriad of ways to get to a country legally. Though I don’t believe the strongest country in the Free World has much use for 20 + million who possess an elementary or less education from Mexico, Central or South American academia.
Please don’t spout off about items you know little or nothing of.
Please get out of your hole/ivy tower/island and see your own country. 90% of those ‘uneducated’ millions ARE working in jobs better than yours, same as yours and the ones you don’t want to do. Get a grip!
Be careful eating your own words, bitterness is not umami.