Get PJ Media on your Apple

Ed Driscoll

Warrants? The NSA Don’t Need No Steeenking Warrants

June 15th, 2013 - 5:42 pm

obama_hope_matrix_6-4-13-4

Yes we scan!  “NSA admits listening to U.S. phone calls without warrants.” C/Net reports:

The National Security Agency has acknowledged in a new classified briefing that it does not need court authorization to listen to domestic phone calls.

Rep. Jerrold Nadler, a New York Democrat, disclosed this week that during a secret briefing to members of Congress, he was told that the contents of a phone call could be accessed “simply based on an analyst deciding that.”

If the NSA wants “to listen to the phone,” an analyst’s decision is sufficient, without any other legal authorization required, Nadler said he learned. “I was rather startled,” said Nadler, an attorney and congressman who serves on the House Judiciary committee.

Not only does this disclosure shed more light on how the NSA’s formidable eavesdropping apparatus works domestically it also suggests the Justice Department has secretly interpreted federal surveillance law to permit thousands of low-ranking analysts to eavesdrop on phone calls.

Because the same legal standards that apply to phone calls also apply to e-mail messages, text messages, and instant messages, Nadler’s disclosure indicates the NSA analysts could also access the contents of Internet communications without going before a court and seeking approval.

The disclosure appears to confirm some of the allegations made by Edward Snowden, a former NSA infrastructure analyst who leaked classified documents to the Guardian. Snowden said in a video interview that, while not all NSA analysts had this ability, he could from Hawaii “wiretap anyone from you or your accountant to a federal judge to even the president.”

There are serious “constitutional problems” with this approach, said Kurt Opsahl, a senior staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation who has litigated warrantless wiretapping cases. “It epitomizes the problem of secret laws.”

No word yet if the DNC’s spying apparatus can retrieve data from the DNC’s proprietary $30K iPhones and $54k Blackberries.

Or Sharyl Attkisson’s laptop.

Comments are closed.

All Comments   (2)
All Comments   (2)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
Teddy Roosevelt was a progressive. Like all of their ilk, he disrespected our Constitution. Progressives do not believe in our Republic. They do not believe in freedom for the masses. They believe in elites ruling over slaves.
43 weeks ago
43 weeks ago Link To Comment
...or Edward Snowden's prior Internet activity.
44 weeks ago
44 weeks ago Link To Comment
View All

2 Trackbacks to “Warrants? The NSA Don’t Need No Steeenking Warrants”