According to CNN, the fight in Basra isn't gong so well, after all:
A closely held U.S. military intelligence analysis of the fighting in Basra shows that Iraqi security forces control less than a quarter of the city, according to officials in both the United States and Iraq, and Basra's police units are deeply infiltrated by members of radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr's Mehdi Army.
"This is going to go on for a while," one U.S. military official said.
Wait -- you mean to tell me that a block-by-block knife fight might not be all shock-and-awe-ish? No freakin' way.
And you also mean to tell me that al Sadr might have used his ceasefire and local tribal loyalties to infiltrate an otherwise-incorruptible Middle Eastern police force? Say it ain't so, Joe.
Seriously, given the nature of city fighting, the constraints of local politics and religious loyalties, ever-present age-old Arab corruption, and every other Middle East pathology, the miracle here is that the Iraqis are fighting -- and winning! -- at all.
Next time, skip the lurid headlines. Hell, most times you might as well skip the MSM's story.
UPDATE: This should be obvious, but needs stating anyway. Anything on CNN is, by definition, anything but "closely held." That's like saying Eliot Spitzer only frequented chaste hookers.
Article printed from VodkaPundit: http://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit
URL to article: http://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2008/3/29/another-angle