Right after Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger began his closing statement in the Kyle Rittenhouse Trial, YouTube cut off channels that were beating legacy media channels. Coincidence?
The Rekieta Law channel, which features multiple lawyers doing real-time analysis of the trial, often beat the number of people watching the PBS stream. The PBS stream is one of the more reliable ones available to YouTube users and was being used by several outlets.
After getting cut off, Nick Rekieta reminded YouTube that ten lawyers considered it a breach of contract.
Today, @TeamYouTube is pushing down independent creators in favor of BOGUS copyright from Media Partners
YT consistently shows that creators who actually build their platform are disfavored to media. Hey YouTube. We have a contract, you're breaking it.https://t.co/OYctyjpsA3
— Rekieta Media (@RekietaMedia) November 15, 2021
But Rekieta wasn’t the only stream cut-off. Dan Abrams’s Law & Crime channel was also cut off.
YouTube just suspended @lawcrimenews stream of the Rittenhouse trial!
— Jacek Posobiec 🇺🇸🇵🇱 (@JackPosobiec) November 15, 2021
Ticking off channels featuring dozens of lawyers seemed like a bad business plan. Within a few minutes, the stream was put back up after Rekieta reminded the tech giant that the courtroom coverage was public property and therefore not under copyright.
Hey @TeamYouTube this is a PUBLIC HEARING. THIS IS NOT COPYRIGHT. GET OFF YOUR ASSES and support your small creators https://t.co/hUA7LTczkR
— Rekieta Media (@RekietaMedia) November 15, 2021
For a few minutes there, it was bedlam for those of us who like to view different streams to cover the trial — especially streams featuring lawyers who know the facts of the case.
YouTube knew very well how many tens of thousands of people were watching other-than-legacy media and cut them off. After it cut off Rekieta Law, the legal channel still had 60,000+ people who came back to watch.
Makes you wonder why YouTube cut them off, doesn’t it?
Join the conversation as a VIP Member