The PJ Tatler

The 2 Different Kinds of Libertarians Fighting on the Right

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySEGcGTctI0

The fight over who the 2016 GOP presidential nominee should be is an expression of which ideological movement has the dominant position in the party. And it’s a contest between many different philosophies across economics, social issues, and foreign policy. “The Right” is not a monolith where everyone agrees — it’s a loose, squabbling coalition that changes and evolves from decade to decade as the threats facing America change and evolve.

Here’s an exchange I had in the comments for my piece earlier this week asking “Which of These 23 Reader-Submitted 2016 GOP Ticket Suggestions Is The Best? (The First 9 Are My Favorites)”:

Screen Shot 2015-02-12 at 8.40.21 AM Screen Shot 2015-02-12 at 8.41.23 AM

Bronx Zionist, in answer to Mpower69:

Screen Shot 2015-02-12 at 8.43.56 AM Screen Shot 2015-02-12 at 8.44.06 AM Screen Shot 2015-02-12 at 8.44.15 AM

(For those new to the ideological discussion: here are my previous Tatler posts laying out the basics for why I so loudly oppose the “Rothbardian” wing of the Libertarian-Right and its political leaders Ron and Rand Paul.)

What do you think? Which “side” are you on? Ron Paul Libertarian-Anarchist or Ronald Reagan Libertarian-Conservative or Jeb Bush Fox News Corporatist?

Neoconservative, non-interventionist dove, Kissinger-style “realist,” Counter-Jihad defense hawk? Which other important ideologies are fighting not just for the presidency but for the future of the party?