The Euston Manifesto – in which a number of liberal/leftists try to return to their “authentic values” (some of which could justify more hawkish foreign policy views) – is one of the more interesting and laudatory documents to appear on the Internet in some time, not least because it shows people wrestling with their beliefs in a genuine manner. Still (or should I say “Therefore”?), it is hardly surprising that it received the reactions detailed by Norm Geras:
Much of the comment on the manifesto has been, to put it generously, pathetic; and, though this part of it doesn’t actually merit a response, it is worth registering just how much there has been like that. Schematically: (1) ‘Ha ha, they met in a pub.’ (2) ‘Tee hee, they named it after a station.’ (3) Some other generic flip but contentless remark. (4) ‘These people are deadbeats’; or [from some of the sadder members of the blogosphere] one or another version of ‘They are bad people.’
Norm does a superb job in his essay of defending the signers against more adult criticism than the above. Read it. (via PJM)
Join the Conversation
VIP members get the ability to comment on articles.