The sound of laughter spilled out from TMZ’s newsroom as news broke of Charlie Kirk’s assassination. It was a jarring soundtrack to a tragedy, and though the outlet rushed to issue an apology, blaming the cheers on a separate car chase unfolding on another screen, the damage was already done. When people hear clapping and laughter moments after the murder of a young father and conservative leader, they don’t stop to parse excuses. They feel the sneer. They recognize the callousness. And many wonder if this wasn’t simply another mask slipping.
Related: Possible Kirk-Related Bomb on Fox News Van Fizzled, But That's Not the Weird Part...
That moment didn’t occur in a vacuum. It’s the latest entry in a long ledger of tone-deaf and inappropriate behavior by TMZ. This is the same newsroom that infamously broke the death of Kobe Bryant before authorities had even informed his family, a move condemned as “cold” and “disrespectful.” It’s the same outlet that lingered over gruesome details of Avicii’s suicide and Chester Bennington’s death, ignoring basic guidelines designed to prevent copycat tragedies and to honor the dignity of the dead. It is the same outlet that once splashed what it claimed was a bombshell photo of John F. Kennedy on a yacht with naked women — only for it to be exposed as a Playboy shoot hoax. Sensationalism, not accuracy, was the currency. And time and again, TMZ has chosen speed and spectacle over humanity and restraint.
The defense is always the same: the public has a right to know. But who defines that right? Did the world need to know about Kobe Bryant’s death before his wife did? Did fans need to be told exactly how Avicii ended his life, down to the weapon and method, when suicide reporting guidelines specifically warn against such detail? Does the public interest justify broadcasting laughter that coincides with an assassination, then shrugging it off as an unfortunate overlap? There is a line between journalism and voyeurism. TMZ crossed it long ago, and moments like this only remind us how far on the wrong side they remain.
Related: Another One Bites the Dust: WaPo's Karen Attiah Fired for 'Unacceptable' Kirk Posts
The problem isn’t just one newsroom, but what it represents. TMZ has become a shorthand for an era of media where outrage, humiliation, and spectacle are business models. Every tasteless “scoop” comes with clicks, every breach of decency with ad revenue. In that sense, the laughter during Kirk’s coverage is symbolic. Whether or not it was about him, it revealed the mood within an industry where tragedy is just another form of content.
Charlie Kirk’s death is a national wound. To hear even the echo of celebration around it is to understand how deep our divisions run and how dehumanizing our media culture has become. TMZ’s apology may be accepted by some, rejected by others. But the larger question remains: how many apologies can one outlet offer before we stop treating it as a news source and start recognizing it as what it is — a factory of exploitation that thrives on crossing lines it pretends not to see?
Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy PJ Media’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join PJ Media VIP and use the promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership!
Join the conversation as a VIP Member