It's cliché at this point to say that if Democrats didn't have double standards, they'd have none at all, but, you know what? Time and time again, they prove that mantra true. Do Democrats have any genuine principles, or are they guided only by their perpetual quest for unchecked power? I think it's clear that it's the latter.
Cast your mind back to late 2024. Donald Trump had just nominated Pete Hegseth as Secretary of Defense — now Secretary of War — and the left lost its collective mind over his tattoos. Democrats and their media allies went to war against Hegseth, insisting the symbols on his arm and chest were proof he was a white supremacist, a Christian nationalist, a Nazi sympathizer. It would have been funny except there’s nothing funny about falsely accusing someone of such things.
Hegseth has roughly 12 tattoos on his right arm and chest, and they reference his military service, patriotism, and Christian faith. The Jerusalem cross on his chest became Exhibit A for the prosecution. Some people on social media went so far as to suggest it was a swastika. The media obliged, dutifully declaring his tattoos "controversial" and breathlessly linking them to extremist movements.
To be clear: A man wore Christian and pro-American tattoos on his body, and Democrats tried to use that to argue he was unfit to lead the nation's military.
Now flash forward to today, and meet Graham Platner — the presumptive Democrat nominee for the U.S. Senate in Maine. For roughly 20 years, Platner had a tattoo on his chest that wasn't just linked to Nazi imagery. It was the literal symbol of Adolf Hitler's paramilitary SS. He proudly brandished the tattoo for decades, only covering it up because he decided to run for Senate.
Platner initially denied that the tattoo had anything to do with Nazi symbolism, and then just started piling on excuses for it, from claiming he was ignorant of the symbol’s meaning to even blaming his military service for him getting it in the first place.
That's the story Democrats want you to swallow. Last week, Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) defended Platner not just for the tattoo, but for past online posts described as bigoted and misogynistic, blaming it all on PTSD. "Let's take a couple issues, including the comments he's made in the past," Van Hollen said. "I mean, he's been very clear that he went into combat on behalf of the United States, he went through a really tough period, PTSD-type period."
Van Hollen added, “And he himself said there are lots of things he's done and said that he completely regrets, and I do believe people should have second chances and that people can learn from their mistakes, and I think he's been doing that.”
Millions of men and women have served in combat, experienced PTSD, and come back without tattooing Nazi symbols on their chests or posting bigoted screeds online or blaming women for getting raped. Using military service as a catch-all excuse for extremist imagery doesn't honor veterans — it patronizes them.
Then there's former Obama speechwriter Jon Favreau, who called Platner "a good, decent man who's struggled and grown and is always trying to do better." This is the same Jon Favreau who tweeted in 2022, "Let me know when a far lefty candidate appears with a Nazi sympathizer and we can chat."
When called out on the staggering hypocrisy, Favreau shrugged it off last week, insisting that "MAGA world" was simply trying "to fool" Mainers into thinking Platner's "old tattoo makes him a Nazi sympathizer."
As the community note makes clear, I didn't delete it because I stand by it.
— Jon Favreau (@jonfavs) May 3, 2026
But if MAGA world has decided their best play is to insult Mainers' intelligence by trying to fool them into thinking Platner's old tattoo makes him a Nazi sympathizer, best of luck in November! https://t.co/JpkY5hH3cG
Here's the thing: Platner had the tattoo. He wore it for 20 years. He only removed it when a Senate campaign made it politically inconvenient. That's a fact.
The left spent months insisting that Pete Hegseth’s tattoos made him unfit for public service. Now those same voices want you to believe that an actual Nazi tattoo worn for two decades is a non-issue, a smear, a cynical political attack. The cognitive dissonance required to hold both of those positions simultaneously is truly something to behold — and it tells you everything you need to know about what actually drives the left's outrage machine.
Related: James Talarico Is Facing Serious Questions About His Creepy Conduct With Kids
