I’m all for buying movies digitally—less clutter on the shelves, no scratched discs to worry about, and instant access whenever I want. It feels great to own a collection without hauling around DVDs or worrying about a favorite film getting ruined. But here’s the problem: the more we embrace the convenience of digital, the clearer it becomes that these “permanent” purchases aren’t permanent at all. Studios can tweak, censor, or outright rewrite classics to fit whatever woke agenda is in style that week—and there’s nothing you can do about it. What you think you own today could be a sanitized, politically correct version tomorrow.
The latest example? Amazon has quietly scrubbed the iconic guns from the promotional art of every James Bond film available on its platform. This means that those familiar images of 007—the tuxedo, the cool expression, the handgun in hand—are now either missing or awkwardly manipulated.
Amazon, which now owns the Bond catalog after its acquisition of MGM, claims it hasn’t altered the content of the films — just the artwork. But that’s hardly reassuring. If they’re willing to change how the films are represented, how long before they decide that the movies themselves need a little “updating”?
We’ve seen this movie before, literally. Disney+ edited Adventures in Babysitting to replace the pejorative use of the word “homo,” with “weirdo.” The change didn’t make the movie any better—it just sanitized a piece of its time. And that’s the problem. These tweaks may start small, but they add up to something more insidious: a gradual rewriting of cultural history, a digital revisionism that erases the past to appease the present.
ICYMI: Could President Trump Appear on the $1 Coin Next Year?
What’s happening with Bond is part of a larger trend where classic media is being “modernized” for contemporary sensibilities. At first it was disclaimers and trigger warnings slapped on old movies, warning viewers about potentially “offensive” material. Now, it’s physical changes to the content or its imagery. The line between preservation and manipulation is blurring fast.
And then there’s the next frontier in this madness: artificial intelligence. As AI technology races ahead, it’s easy to picture a future where Hollywood sensitivity experts will scrub decades of film, television, and literature clean of anything they find “problematic.” That edgy joke from a ’90s sitcom? Deleted. The no-nonsense action hero who doesn’t conform to today’s fragile notions of masculinity? Neutered. A mostly white cast in a beloved classic? Erased—say goodbye to whitey.
Sound like science fiction? It’s not. Just look at what Hollywood’s already doing. Race-swapping characters has become practically mandatory. Transgender-identifying males are now cast as women. The Academy Awards even impose diversity quotas for eligibility, forcing films to tick off boxes instead of focusing on storytelling. Every new production bends over backward to meet arbitrary “diversity” quotas, even if it means sacrificing authenticity. Given those trends, how long before studios start using AI to “update” old classics—turning Casablanca into a lecture on intersectionality, with Rick digitally recast as a black man and Ilsa rewritten as the wife of “Victoria” Laszlo?
We all know where this is headed, which is why people are right to worry that even James Bond—the timeless icon of cool, confident, unapologetic masculinity—is next on the list of the woke censors. Before long, you won’t be able to tell the difference between James Bond and Tim Walz.
The truth is that art, even flawed art, tells us something about the time in which it was created. Erasing those flaws erases the history. The people who made these stories lived in a different world, with different norms, and that context matters. The power of fiction lies not in its perfection but in its authenticity.
So when Amazon quietly removes the gun from Bond’s hand, it’s not a tiny detail. It the top of a slippery slope of beloved content being changed by the woke gatekeepers of popular culture.
