05-18-2018 12:27:15 PM -0700
05-17-2018 08:38:50 AM -0700
05-11-2018 07:34:04 AM -0700
05-09-2018 10:17:16 AM -0700
05-04-2018 02:59:17 PM -0700
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.

The Most Important Candidates You Probably Won't Vote for on Tuesday


Today, millions of voters will go to the polls and see state and local school board candidates on their ballots. We know that turnout for school board elections is pathetically low. A recent state school board election in Arkansas only managed to turn out 2 percent of the state's registered voters. Two percent! Reasons voters give for failing to vote for school board candidates include not having enough information about them or thinking that the election is not particularly important — that it won’t really affect their lives.

Though most people pay little attention to these races and cannot name their elected state school board representatives or even their local school board members, these board members often play a vital role in implementing education laws passed by the legislature and creating policies that can affect every child who attends public school. In Ohio, the State Board of Education is charged with writing the regulations to enforce the new Common Core standards and the state-mandated testing that goes along with the standards. They also administer the regulations for private schools, charter schools, and homeschools. They even have the power to radically change the homeschooling regulations without involving the legislature. Yet a large number of Ohioans don’t vote in these elections and don't pay any attention to what the board does.

Likewise with local school board elections, many people are uninformed about the candidates and their views. Your local school board decides how the money your district collects for the schools is spent. Is the board stacked with union hacks? Many -- if not most -- of them are. State and local teachers unions spend a boatload of money to maintain control of school boards. Union-controlled board members will likely happily give in to union demands at contract time and tell the football team to take a hike when the money runs out. They know the voters will usually cave in and vote for a school levy if they make the kids and parent feel the pain by cutting out sports and busing. They know most voters won’t bother to read the union contracts to find out about the Cadillac benefit plans the teachers enjoy (with no co-pays or deductibles on their health insurance and 100% employer-funded pension plans). It's for the children, they'll cry, as they hold out their tin cups and beg beleaguered taxpayers for more money.

Since most school board elections are nonpartisan, it’s often difficult to discern which side of important issues candidates are on. Your local newspaper probably won’t report if a candidate is a union plant, a rabid anti-school choice zealot, or a vocal homeschooling opponent. Most candidates read their talking-point twaddle when the newspaper calls to interview them. “I believe that strong schools make our community better,” they intone. You’ll rarely hear them saying they want to raise your taxes or run the charter school out of town when they're running for office. You won’t know until after they’re elected that they’re zero-tolerance zealots who will turn your child over to the county prosecutor when he chews his peanut butter and jelly sandwich into the shape of an assault rifle. These are important questions that are rarely asked, because we're told the important things are vague notions about "great schools" and "property values." We're lulled into thinking that everything will work out OK as long as the candidates support "strong schools," whatever that means.