Chronicling the ongoing intersectional struggle to liberate women — inclusively defined as the legacy kind and the transgenders — from The Patriarchy™, one microaggression at a time.
For time immemorial, as the selector sex, women have wielded with great efficacy their single greatest weapon in the world.
Men have the overwhelming biological drive to basically have sex with every woman all of the time, obviously with some degree of physiological limitation as well as social restraints.
Women, on the other hand, are the selectors; they screen potential mates very carefully to decide whether they’d be good partners and fathers, because they have so much more to lose if things to pan out.
In pregnancy, and with a newborn postpartum, women are extremely physically vulnerable to predation, hence the need for a strong social support system that starts with, primarily and ideally, the man who fathered the child.
In this manner, the woman’s evolutionary responsibility is to decide which genetics get passed on and which are tossed by the wayside.
And they take their job extremely seriously, even when they’re not fully conscious of what they’re really doing.
They provoke to see what a man’s response will be — how he responds under pressure, whether he can be relied on in a pinch.
They probe for weaknesses or warning signs.
Related: 'HuffPost Personal' Cancer: A Tragic Tale of One Husband's Total Emasculation
They test.
Always with the tests.
Any man who’s been in any long-term relationship, even ones that are totally healthy, immediately understands this to be the truth: women can’t help themselves; to test and retest is a biological imperative.
As a husband or boyfriend, you might think, at any given moment, that you’re having a low-stakes, casual conversation, whereas in reality you’re taking a pop quiz.
Failure will be met with consequences, whether minor (like getting henpecked or given the silent treatment) or more serious.
From the moment you meet until death or something else do you part, the tests never stop.
Unfortunately, women’s tests are often shaped — again, often unconsciously — by the cultural milieu in which they find themselves. Women, in addition to their role as biological deciders, are also notorious social conformists — the reflexive enforcers of dogma. (Again, they require social cohesion for their and their offspring’s survival.)
It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy.
-George Orwell, 1984
Related: #Resistance Liberals Tattoo Themselves Blue to Oppose Fascism, Spot ‘Safe People’
So, against that psychosocial backdrop, in the modern West and all of its perversions, fully captured by intersectional feminism, this is what you get.
The Lindsay Clancy litmus test
This young lady’s “vetting process” for suitors is really just a single-item questionnaire: “Do you think that Lindsay Clancy should go to jail for what she did?”
(What she did was allegedly strangle her own three children, one by one, with an exercise band in the family home.)
My new vetting process for if I want to date a man. First-date question I’m always going to be asking him is: Do you think that Lindsay Clancy should go to jail for what she did? And if that man says yes, I’m getting up and walking out, right then and there. I cannot spend the rest of my life with someone who thinks that that woman is guilty and deserves jail.
This woman says her new dating-vetting process includes asking a man on the first date whether he believes Lindsay Clancy is innocent. If he says no, she says she’ll walk out.
— I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸 (@ImMeme0) August 22, 2026
“I cannot spend the rest of my life with someone who thinks that woman is guilty and deserves jail.”… pic.twitter.com/GG2NiAImD6
