Archiving the “strange death of Europe,” as Douglas Murray put it, and the West more broadly, at the hands of the neoliberal technocracy.
Top British copper: Official police policy requiring disparate treatment of native British leads to conspiracy theories about disparate police treatment of British natives
For a summary of the nonsense rambling of the guy who is ostensibly on track to become the next police chief of London:
- Two-tier policing isn’t happening, but it is happening.
- But if you notice that what isn’t happening but actually is happening is happening, you’re a conspiracy theorist.
- Except me — I’m not a conspiracy theorist for acknowledging what’s not happening but actually is happening.
- I can do the acknowledging; the peasants can’t, or they’re racist.
Via The Guardian (emphasis added):
Policing in Britain has “adopted the language of activism” and official guidance has “over-corrected” to combat accusations of racism, one of the UK’s most senior officers has said.
Sir Stephen Watson, the chief constable of Greater Manchester police, said he did not believe that “two-tier policing” existed or that forces were biased against white people.
Police had, however, allowed that perception to take hold in part as a result of anti-racism guidance that advised officers to treat suspects differently depending on their ethnicity.
Watson said the official guidance, produced by the National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) in 2025, should be reviewed after the murder of Henry Nowak, whose treatment by officers prompted riots in Southampton and accusations of two-tier policing from Nigel Farage and the Trump administration…
After criticism in the wake of Nowak’s murder, the NPCC is reviewing its 2025 “anti-racism commitment”, which states that officers should “respond to individuals and communities according to their specific needs, circumstances and experiences, with understanding that these will be racialised and with the aim of reducing harm. It does not mean treating everyone ‘the same’ or being ‘colour blind’ (racial equality)”.
It’s like trying to follow a Karine Jean-Pierre press briefing, albeit slightly more coherent.
Related: Karine Jean-Pierre Lavished With ‘Torchbearer in Communications’ DEI Award
Truly mind-boggling Orwellian sophistry.
We’ve always been at war with Eastasia.
How many fingers am I holding up?
UK grants convicted Jamaican creep entry on ‘human rights’ grounds
Chalk up another win for the seemingly omnipotent European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
Related: 12-Foot Statue of Obese Black Woman Appears in Times Square
Via the Daily Mail (emphasis added):
Immigration judges granted a convicted child sex offender the right to enter Britain after ruling that barring him would breach his human rights.
The latest shocking example of a ‘deeply perverse’ ruling from the immigration courts involves Jamaican paedophile Oniel Spence, who was jailed in the United States for a sexual offence against a 15-year-old girl.
Details of the case are revealed by the Daily Mail for the first time today after shadow home secretary Chris Philp this week blasted judges’ ‘tyranny’ over the immigration system.
Spence, now 43, applied to come to the UK in 2023 to join his wife and child - who are both British nationals - but was blocked by the Home Office.
Officials barred his application on the grounds his exclusion was ‘conducive to the public good’.
The paedophile then lodged an appeal at the lower immigration tribunal and won permission to come here from immigration judge Jonathan Greer.
His lawyers argued preventing him from entering Britain had breached Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which covers the right to ‘private and family life’.
Judge granted Jamaican paedophile the right to enter Britain as barring him would 'breach his human rights' https://t.co/bFxiIt5gQk
— Daily Mail (@DailyMail) June 17, 2026
Related: Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson Declares ‘Transfemicide State of Emergency’
Previous courts hearing the case were reassured by the migrant’s lawyers that he is “primarily sexually attracted to adults” and that his interest in minors is merely “secondary.”
Continuing:
His previous legal challenges were allowed by junior judges despite Spence’s lawyers indicating he is ‘primarily sexually attracted to adults’, which judges said showed he has ‘at least a residual or secondary sexual attraction to children’.
The child sex offence took place in the United States in 2008, when he was 25 years old.
He was convicted of ‘lewd and lascivious conduct with a victim aged under 16’ in a nightclub in Saint Lucie, Florida.
