Archiving the “strange death of Europe,” as Douglas Murray put it, at the hands of the Brussels bureaucracy (and Downing Street) and their hordes of imported “migrants.”
Degenerate legacy media hack Wajahat Ali: ‘You have lost… We’re embedded. We’re everywhere’
Pakistani Democrat operative Wajahat Ali, who is usually subtler in his genocidal — and I use that term advisedly — hatred for white people and Western culture, really let it rip in a recent video:
You have lost. The mistake that you made is you let us in the first place. That's the thing with brown people—I'm saying this as a brown person. There are a lot of us… 1.2 billion in India, there’s more than 200 million in Pakistan.... We breed. We’re a breeding people.
And the problem is, you let us in in 1965. Once you let one of us in…. We have a bunch of kids. And then guess what? Some white women, you know the Western civilization women… they like some of us brown folks.
So we're embedded. We’re everywhere…
You have lost. Your story is a shitty story filled with misery. It’s filled with bland chicken. It’s filled with terrible, terrible dry-ass meat. Your music sucks. All your culture sucks. That's why the kids listen to black people and their music.
Wajahat Ali: "Whites, your mistake is you let us in. We are breeding people. Your culture suck. You already lost."
— Officer Lew (@officer_Lew) November 30, 2025
White culture is being exterminated… pic.twitter.com/CICqZyMiYI
His vileness notwithstanding, you have to give the devil his due: the ultimate responsibility for the West’s self-immolation lies with the governing authorities of the West who not just allowed it but facilitated it.
Related: Migrant Assaults 'Severely' Disabled Man in Mall Bathroom (With an Extra Sadistic Twist)
Imagine the delusional audacity of, of all the nationalities to claim superiority, a Pakistani telling Westerners their culture sucks and that Pakistani music and food is superior.
There are, obviously, dozens of angles you could take to test the veracity of the “Pakistan uber alles” narrative.
Related: Migrants Committed Almost 70% of Violent Crimes in France Last Year
Just for fun, I consulted Grok with the prompt “What are the inbreeding rates in Pakistan and how do they compare to Western countries?”
The results are shocking:
Inbreeding in human populations is typically measured through the prevalence of consanguineous marriages (unions between second cousins or closer relatives) and the inbreeding coefficient (F), which quantifies the probability that two alleles at a locus are identical by descent (ranging from 0 for no inbreeding to higher values like 0.0625 for first-cousin offspring). Pakistan has one of the highest rates globally, driven by cultural, economic, and social factors* favoring cousin marriages, particularly first cousins.
- Prevalence of Consanguineous Marriages: Studies consistently report rates of 50-70%, with national surveys showing 60-63% in recent decades. For example:
- The 1990/91 Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey (PDHS) found 62.7% of marriages were consanguineous, with 80.4% of these between first cousins.
- A 2018 PDHS analysis indicated a slight decline to 63.6%, though rates remain high at around 70% in some rural areas.
- Regional studies confirm this: 61.3% in Okara district (2016-2017), 56.7% in Sargodha district (2014), and 55% in northwest districts like Haripur and Mansehra (2023).
- Inbreeding Coefficient (F): Typically 0.03-0.035 for the population, reflecting the dominance of first-cousin unions (F=0.0625 for offspring). Examples include 0.0331 (national PDHS), 0.0356 (Okara), and 0.0348 (Sargodha). A recent 2023 study in northwest Pakistan noted a decline to F=0.029, suggesting a gradual decrease due to urbanization and education.
These high rates contribute to elevated risks of recessive genetic disorders, with consanguinity linked to over 50% of birth defects and doubled infant mortality (78 per 1,000 live births vs. global averages).
Comparison to Western Countries
Western countries (e.g., USA, UK, Germany, France, Canada) have extremely low inbreeding rates, often below 1%, due to legal restrictions on close-kin marriages, cultural norms emphasizing exogamy**, and historical church prohibitions (e.g., Catholic bans on unions within four degrees of consanguinity). Consanguinity is rare outside isolated communities like the Amish (USA, ~5-10% effective rate due to endogamy).
*“Driven by cultural factors”!
**Western “cultural norms emphasizing exogamy.”
In other words, Pakistani culture encourages inbreeding, resulting in upwards of 70% of inbred marriages while Western culture discourages inbreeding, resulting in less than 1% inbred marriages.
Weird that Wajahat leaves that glaring factoid out of his analysis.
