“Misogynist: A man who hates women as much as women hate one another.”
-H.L. Mencken
If you follow the carcinogenic dumpster fire that is the X conserva-sphere, you might be familiar with the scorched-Earth feud over the last few years between Laura Loomer and Rep. Marjorie Taylor-Greene.
The substance of their long-running but recently re-ignited dispute, such as it is, is a disagreement over Israeli-U.S. relations.
But that’s not what this is about.
This is about the absolute state of the intra-MAGA female scorched-Earth warfare vis-à-vis Arbys™ -Gate.
No one ever accused Laura Loomer of a hesitancy to go nuclear, and she certainly hasn’t disappointed here.
Related: MAGA Influencer Accuses AG Pam Bondi of First Amendment Violation on X
By way of background, Loomer is currently suing Bill Maher for suggesting last year that Trump and Loomer were having an affair, an allegation that Loomer claims cost her professional opportunities such as her coveted role as Trump’s White House press secretary.
As part of the lawsuit, Loomer was deposed recently, at which time, for some reason, opposing counsel broached a September 2024 X post in which she asserted that Marjorie-Taylor Greene had “Arby’s in her pants” — an obvious popular reference to her being a “loose” woman, as it were.Hey @mtgreenee
— Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) September 12, 2024
Remember when you destroyed your family so you could have sex with a Zangief cosplayer?
Tell me again how you and the Arby’s in your pants are representatives of the GOP?
You couldn’t even run your own family.
Don’t tell me how to run my FREE SPEECH! https://t.co/5uLJazc1Jh pic.twitter.com/XI1zwE8fXR
For whatever reason, probably under advice of counsel, Loomer was forced to pretend that she literally meant MTG puts Arby’s sandwiches in her pants, rather than the clear, off-color insinuation regarding her genitalia.
Perhaps the most surreal back-and-forth in the history of civil court ensued.
Via United States District Court, Middle District of Florida:
Q: Can you explain to me what it means to say to her that "the Arby's in her pants"?
A Well, Arby's --
MR. KLAYMAN: Objection. Relevancy.
BY MS. BOLGER:
Q Answer the question.
A Arby's sells roast beef.
Right. Can you tell me what -- why you were talking about "the Arby's in her pants"?
A Well, it's just a -- an expression.
Q What is the expression trying to convey?
A It conveys the reason why she got a divorce by her own admission.
Q Because she had roast beef in her pants?
A Yeah.
Q She'd put roast beef in her pants; that's what you're trying to say there? You're literally saying she put Arby's in her pants?
2 A I'm saying she literally -- it's so ridiculous. I'm saying she literally put Arby's in her pants. Yes.
MR. KLAYMAN: Objection. Relevancy.
BY MS. BOLGER:
Q You're not making a slur about her?
A No.
Q You're literally saying she put an Arby's sandwich in her pants; is that right?
A Yes. That's correct. That's correct.
Q Why are you laughing?
A Because I just think it's so funny.
Q What is your basis for saying she put Arby's in her pants?
A I just think it's so funny. I just think it's so funny.
Q What is your basis for saying she put Arby's in her pants?
A She carries roast beef in her pockets.
Q What is your basis for saying she puts roast beef in her pockets and in her pants?
MR. KLAYMAN: Objection. Relevancy. Harassment.
The line of questioning continues, but you get the picture.
