Premium

Moderna Announces mRNA Injections to Prevent… Potential Side Effects of COVID mRNA Injections?

AP Photo/Matt Slocum

This is a particularly malicious version of what heroin junkies call “chasing the dragon.”

Pharmaceutical corporations call it a never-ending gravy train of cascading, artificially induced Public Health™ emergencies, each triggering the next round of profiteering.

Via Yahoo! Finance (emphasis added):

Shares of Moderna MRNA rose 3% on Wednesday after management announced positive clinical updates at its Vaccines Day Event, highlighting its pipeline progress.

While the company provided an update on multiple pipeline candidates, it announced its decision to advance three vaccines to pivotal late-stage development. These include mRNA-1189 (for Epstein-Barr virus [EBV]), mRNA-1468 (for Varicella-Zoster virus [VZV]) and mRNA-1405 (for norovirus).

The decision to advance these candidates is based on data from separate early-stage clinical studies on these vaccines. Data from these studies showed that the vaccines were immunogenic and well-tolerated among the study participants.

Let’s try to cobble together some puzzle pieces here.

It has long been credibly well-established — if not well-publicized by the governing authorities and the corporate state media — that the COVID-19 shots potentially wreck the immune system of recipients, opening up vulnerabilities for viral pathogens exactly like the ones listed above as new therapeutic targets of Moderna mRNA injections to exploit.

Dr. Peter McCullough, who has been in the trenches for many years now exposing the criminal malfeasance of the pharmaceutical industry vis-à-vis mRNA injections, co-authored the paper below on this topic.

RelatedDr. Peter McCullough, COVID Truth Hero, Goes on Offense Against Trump Over Vax Shilling

Via Food and Chemical Toxicology (emphasis added):

There has been an unwavering message about the safety and efficacy of mRNA vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2 from the public health apparatus in the US and around the globe. The efficacy is increasingly in doubt, as shown in a recent letter to the Lancet Regional Health by Günter Kampf. Kampf provided data showing that the vaccinated are now as likely as the unvaccinated to spread disease. He concluded: “It appears to be grossly negligent to ignore the vaccinated population as a possible and relevant source of transmission when deciding about public health control measures.” Moreover, the inadequacy of phase I, II, and III trials to evaluate mid-term and long-term side effects from mRNA genetic vaccines may have been misleading on their suppressive impact on the innate immunity of the vaccinees.

In this paper, we call attention to three very important aspects of the safety profile of these vaccinations. First is the extensively documented subversion of innate immunity, primarily via suppression of IFN-α and its associated signaling cascade. This suppression will have a wide range of consequences, not the least of which include the reactivation of latent viral infections* and the reduced ability to effectively combat future infections. Second is the dysregulation of the system for both preventing and detecting genetically driven malignant transformation within cells and the consequent potential for vaccination to promote those transformations. Third, mRNA vaccination potentially disrupts intracellular communication carried out by exosomes, and induces cells taking up spike glycoprotein mRNA to produce high levels of spike-glycoprotein-carrying exosomes, with potentially serious inflammatory consequences. Should any of these potentials be fully realized, the impact on billions of people around the world could be enormous and could contribute to both the short-term and long-term disease burden our health care system faces.

*VZV, which Moderna is now developing mRNA shots to ostensibly neutralize, is one such virus that causes the re-emergence of latent infections, potentially facilitated by COVID mRNA shots.

Via CDC (emphasis added):

Varicella (chickenpox) is an acute infectious disease. It is caused by varicella-zoster virus (VZV), which is a DNA virus that is a member of the herpesvirus group. After the primary infection, VZV stays in the body (in the sensory nerve ganglia) as a latent infection. Primary infection with VZV causes varicella. Reactivation of latent infection causes herpes zoster (shingles).

Post-vax rollout studies have demonstrated a temporal correlation between the injections and the development of herpes zoster, the infection caused by latent VZV.

Via Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology (emphasis added):

[The objective is] to describe the demographic, clinical, morphological characteristics, outcomes, and timing of development of herpes zoster to the various COVID-19 vaccines. And to identify on whether COVID-19 vaccine has temporal relationship between development of herpes zoster (HZ)…

A total of 54 cases consisting of 27 male and 27 female patients have been reported. There were cases with known risk factors for herpes zoster, which included age more than 50 years (n = 36), immunological disorders (n = 10), chronic disease (n = 25), metabolic disorder (n = 13), malignancy (n = 4), and psychiatric disorder (n = 2). The mean (SD) period between development of herpes zoster and COVID-19 vaccination was 7.64 (6.92) days. Majority of the cases were from the high-income and/or middle-income countries. 86.27% of the cases of HZ were reported due to mRNA vaccine. Thirty-six patients 36/45 (80%) developed herpes zoster following the priming dose of COVID-19 vaccine among those who received mRNA vaccine.

One definitive correlation we can draw is between the degree of sickness inflicted on the public and the health of Moderna’s bottom line, you see.

It's a dirty game, folks.

Recommended

Trending on PJ Media Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement