Pioneering practitioners of The Science™ are hard at work devising a biomedical means of eliminating any pleasure induced by the consumption of cocaine, which it is marketing as a “vaccine” — as if the definition of the term hasn’t been bastardized enough already.
This is sure to turn out just swell.
Via Japan Today (emphasis added):
“Scientists in Brazil, the world's second-biggest consumer of cocaine, have announced the development of an innovative new treatment for addiction to the drug and its powerful derivative crack: a vaccine.
Dubbed "Calixcoca," the test vaccine, which has shown promising results in trials on animals, triggers an immune response that blocks cocaine and crack from reaching the brain, which researchers hope will help users break the cycle of addiction.
Put simply, addicts would no longer get high from the drug.
If the treatment gets regulatory approval, it would be the first time cocaine addiction is treated using a vaccine, said psychiatrist Frederico Garcia, coordinator of the team that developed the treatment at the Federal University of Minas Gerais.
The project won top prize last week -- 500,000 euros ($530,000) -- at the Euro Health Innovation awards for Latin American medicine, sponsored by pharmaceutical firm Eurofarma.”
Here’s a wild idea: what if, instead of devising innovative new methods for messing with people’s immune systems with no real idea of, or concern for, the long-term consequences (as if we learned nothing from the COVID-19 shots debacle), the Public Health™ authorities instead devoted those immense resources to understanding why people are driven to substance abuse in the first instance?
Addiction is, by and large, not a medical problem. It’s a social and psychological one. Of course, as a descendant of Irish ancestors such as myself who has struggled with alcoholism can attest, there certainly is a physiological component to a propensity for addiction, but it’s by no means whatsoever the entire picture.
More injections are not the answer, however profitable they might be for the pharmaceutical industry that dominates society.
In short order, we will see the rollout of “vaccines” for nearly every alleged social ill, regardless of whether the interventions work or are even necessary in the first instance. The only criteria are a.) that they serve some social engineering purpose and b.) they generate profit for pharmaceutical corporations.
Recently, an NYU bioethicist proposed injecting humans with a “vaccine” of sorts to trigger an immune response and resulting allergy to red meat as a means of enforcing the vegan agenda on the population at the point of a needle.
All of the -isms and various phobias — racism, sexism, transphobia, whatever — will certainly be included in this.
Vaccines do reduce one’s carbon footprint will also appear.
The future CDC PSAs will read: “New research suggests you can safely get your racism and transphobia booster at the same time!”
We’ll require “vaccines” to inoculate us against the natural immune response to chitin, an inflammatory and toxic compound found in insect exoskeletons that we are encouraged to eat regardless for the Earth.
Related: Chitin: The Inflammatory Bug Compound the Peasants May Soon Be Forced to Eat
Then we’ll need vaccines to fix the damage caused by the vaccines needed to remedy the ill effects of forced bug consumption — when we might have simply foregone the whole melodrama and gone on eating standard protein sources as we have for thousands of years.
“Vaccines today, vaccines tomorrow, vaccines forever!”
