Weather Nerd

By Brendan Loy

Bio

Get Updates From Brendan Loy

Will Ike ever strengthen?

September 11, 2008 - 7:19 am - by Brendan Loy

Hurricane Ike is a very strange storm. After yesterday evening’s four-hour, 11-millibar pressure drop, Dr. Jeff Masters titled his late-evening post “Ike intensifying explosively,” and predicted a Cat. 3 or 4 hurricane by morning. This seems all the more plausible when the pressure dropped yet another 4 mb in the following four hours. But, as of yet, Ike’s wind speed has not budged. He remains a minimal Category 2 hurricane, with 100 mph winds, despite a minimum central pressure that suggests something two categories stronger. The National Hurricane Center’s 5am EDT discussion summarizes the weirdness:

IKE CONTINUES TO EXHIBIT SOME UNUSUAL STRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS.  DROPSONDE AND FLIGHT-LEVEL WIND DATA INDICATE THAT THE INTENSITY IS STILL NEAR [100 MPH]…WHICH IS ANOMALOUSLY LOW FOR THE REPORTED CENTRAL PRESSURE.   THE LATTER VALUE…946 MB…WOULD NORMALLY CORRESPOND TO A BORDERLINE CATEGORY 3/4 HURRICANE.   THE TROPICAL CYCLONE HAS A VERY LARGE WIND FIELD…PARTICULARLY OVER THE NORTHERN SEMICIRCLE AS OBSERVED BY BUOYS AND SHIPS OVER THE NORTHERN GULF.   HOWEVER IT CONTINUES TO HAVE A SMALL INNER CORE WITH AN EYE JUST UNDER 10 N MI IN DIAMETER. THERE HAS BEEN A DOUBLE WIND MAXIMUM…ALTHOUGH HURRICANE HUNTER OBSERVATIONS SUGGEST THAT THE OUTER WIND BAND IS BEGINNING TO CONTRACT.

The “double wind maximum” point is key. Ever since Ike exited Cuba, the tiny size of its inner core has seemingly suggested that it’s on the verge of an eyewall replacement cycle — which, in a normal storm at least, would be expected to result in temporary weakening, followed by strengthening, as the inner eyewall disintegrates and then is replaced by a contacting outer eyewall. But no ERC has yet occurred, and thus the double eyewall structure remains. This seems to be playing a big role in Ike’s stubborn refusal to intensify, despite the very low pressure.

Alan Sullivan sums things up thusly:

This morning hurricane Ike continues to display its unusual structure.  Hurricanes often develop distinctive individual characteristics and retain them through much of their cycle.  Ike has had a tiny core from the time it went through an abrupt eyewall replacement just as it reached eastern Cuba’s coastline.  That feature persisted during two land crossings, and it has persisted in the Gulf.  A much larger ring of hurricane winds surrounds the core at a radius of a hundred miles.  This is weird.

With the wind field so extended, Ike has developed a very low central pressure without a corresponding surface intensity. Winds are still only 100 mph despite pressure at 945 mb, which would support category four strength in a small, tightly wound storm. There is concern that this sprawling system might contract (and thus develop stronger winds) just as it approaches the coast somewhere near or southwest of Galveston. This is why NHC fears a major hurricane at landfall, though Ike does not meet that criterion now.

Sullivan himself is unconvinced that such a last-minute contraction will occur. I don’t presume to know whether it’s likely or unlikely, but I trust the NHC that the odds are high enough — if only because of the basic uncertainty that we don’t really understand what’s happening with Ike — to warrant continued concern about a possible landfall by a Cat. 3 or 4 storm, not “just” a Cat. 1 or 2.

Regardless of our slight disagreement on that issue, Sullivan makes a couple of other really good points. For one, he writes, “I do think [the double eyewall weirdness] may induce exceptional tornado risk when [Ike] moves inland and begins to disintegrate.” In comments here, he emphasizes this point again: “I think it is time to start talking about tornadoes. That odd core structure could be a killer, at a considerable distance inland.”

Also:

The effects of Ike may not be that concentrated, but they will be very widespread. With the prolonged run of onshore winds on northeast Texas coast, several tidal cycles may back up into the marshlands, just as floodwaters from inland rains try to head seaward. This could result in a prolonged and dramatic immersion of low-lying areas, compounded by wind-driven waves.

Sticking with the storm surge theme, “Ubu Roi” at Houblog makes another good point: “That wide wind field may be keeping the current velocity low, but it also is allowing Ike to build up one hell of a dome of water to ride atop.” Indeed.

In other words, even if Sullivan is right that Ike will never escape its current Category 2 limbo, this hurricane is still going to be a pretty big deal. (And if it does finally “tighten” into a Cat. 3/4, it’ll be an even bigger deal, obviously. In Ubu’s words: “If it tightens up, and the wind speeds up in the next 24-36 hours, it would be even worse than if it were tight now.”)

Furthermore, even if landfall is a bit down the coast from the “worst-case” coastline between Freeport and western Galveston Island — as projected by the lastest GFDL run, in a retreat from its earlier doomsday scenario — the impact on the vulnerable coastal regions of the Houston/Galveston area might still be rather severe, given the storm’s large size and odd structure.

All in all, it seems like a rather bad time for local officials in vulnerable coastal areas to be gun-shy about evacuations. Personally, if I lived anywhere on Galveston Island, I’d leave now! (On the other hand, if I lived well inland, in a well-constructed home, and not in a surge zone or flood plane, I would not leave. Run from the water, hide from the wind, folks.)

PJ Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that PJ Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. Please note that comments are reviewed by the editorial staff and may not be posted immediately. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pjmedia.com.

4 Comments, 4 Threads, 1 Trackbacks

  1. 1. Hucbald

    I know the Texas coastal plain quite well, being a Texan and having worked the “mere” tropical storm that inundated the Houston area back around Y2K (I can’t remember the name of that storm). Many of the houses I inspected had four feet of water in them for an extended period, and this went on for neighborhood after neighborhood. As broad as Ike is in size, there’s going to be major flooding, regardless of the wind speeds or storm surge at landfall.

    Fortunately, we have a SW to NE flow over the state right now, so I don’t think Ike will stall and rain itself out as that previous storm did. I distinctly remember some places totaled well over 30″ of rain that time, and I’ll never forget the images of submerged semi tractor-trailer rigs on Katy Freeway, a stretch of interstate I’ve driven many, many times.

  2. 2. Texasyank

    Evacuations just went mandatory in Galveston. What I’m seeing here in Houston (going out and about, running my own preparatory errands) is an attitude of oh-well-here-we-go-again by a lot of people. The Katrina evacuation mobilized the entire city; Rita, hard upon Katrina, turned Interstate 45 running north into a 70 mile-long parking lot, and all for what turned into (for us) a heavy rainsatorm. Gustauv missed us by the width of the state of Louisiana. Now, with all that, the reaction seems to be–yawn. Batteries, fresh water, yeah, yeah, know the drill.

    Example: I teach a Saturday morning class at the University of Houston. My class is scheduled to start at nine am–two hours after projected landfall. (My classroom, btw, is below ground.) I emailed the Weekend U coordinator last night and asked almost rhetorically, Um, school is cancelled for Saturday, right? Just heard back. No word. She’ll get back to me. The university is still pissed over giving us what amounted to a six-day vacation during Rita, and, damnit, they’re not making that mistake again!

  3. 3. Ubu Roi

    Brendan, thanks for the quotes. FYI, I intend to keep blogging as long as I can. Depending on how well the communications network holds up, I might manage to blog through a power loss, for at least a while.

    Boards are going up in the area… just a few now: a Wal-Mart here, a gas station there, one of my neighbors…. ours are going up this afternoon.

  4. 4. FlyOnTneWall

    Jeff Masters has a new post up, which includes a quantification of what you (and others) have been saying. The key passage reads:

    The amount of water Ike has put in motion is about 50% greater than what Katrina did, and thus we can expect Ike’s storm surge damage will be similar to or greater than Katrina’s. The way we can estimate this damage potential is to compute the total energy of Ike’s surface winds (kinetic energy). To do this, we must look at how strong the winds are, and factor in the areal coverage of these winds. Thus, we compute the Integrated Kinetic Energy (IKE) by squaring the velocity of the wind and summing over all regions of the hurricane with tropical storm force winds or higher. This “Integrated Kinetic Energy” was recently proposed by Dr. Mark Powell of NOAA’s Hurricane Research Division as a better measure of the destructive power of a hurricane’s storm surge than the usual Category 1-5 Saffir-Simpson scale. For example, Hurricane Katrina hit Mississippi as a strong Category 3 hurricane, yet its storm surge was more characteristic of a Category 5 storm. Dr. Powell came up with a new scale to rate potential storm surge damage based on IKE (not to be confused with Hurricane Ike!) The new scale ranges from 1-6. Katrina and Wilma at their peaks both earned a 5.1 on this scale. At 9:30am EDT this morning, Ike earned a 5.6 on this scale, the highest kinetic energy of any Atlantic storm in the past 40 years.

    In other words, the best case scenario is that Ike continues to confound expectations, remains a surface-level Category 1 hurricane (which it effectively is right now), and hits Texas with a storm surge of the sort that might ordinarily be generated by a Cat 4-5. Or, to be more precise, without the narrow peak a Cat 4-5 would generate just east of its eye, but with an even broader swath of serious flooding. The worst case scenario is that Ike confounds expectations by tying together its upper and lower circulation, its eyewall gets replaced, and it suddenly strengthens into a truly major hurricane – bringing incredibly destructive winds on top of the storm surge.
    Listening to the emergency responders in the Houston metro area, I’m struck that they’re largely focused on the potential for the worst-case scenario. That is, they seem to be worried about shifts in the track and the strength of the winds. It’s now virtually certain that Galveston island will be flooded from the bay-side; and it’s not outside the realm of possibility that the surge will exceed the height of the floodwall, too. You’d think that, after Katrina, they might have figured out that the intensity at landfall matters a whole heck of a lot less than the width of the field and the resultant surge. Perhaps Ike will make them pay attention to the IKE.

One Trackback to “Will Ike ever strengthen?”