Union Goons Get Their Way With High School Kids
July 15th, 2010 - 8:28 am
Trifecta: Democrats pay off the NEA by sentencing 2,000 minority DC kids to the worst (and most expensive) schools in the nation. One tiny voucher program killed off, not to save money, but to please unions.
Why not take their lunch money while you’re at it?
Lunch Money? as in “private funds for students to use to purchase their own food,based on their own proclivities and desires”. A provocative and dangerous idea to say the least “Mr. Suburban landed gentry”
A few questions if I may:
1) Pay for your own food? At School! What is this, the 19th century Dickensian nightmare of Oliver Twist?
2) If kids start showing up at school with spare change, wouldn’t that be proof positive to some people that taxation still has room to grow?
3) If some kids have more money than others, wouldn’t that mean that some kids would get more food at school than others? Wouldn’t you consider that unfair? Clearly we need to consider pooling what you call “lunch money” to ensure equitable distribution of the funds to those who are truly in need.
4) Would you let your kid take fungible assets into that environment? For the children’s safety, we should have a zero tolerance policy on money at school. After all, most crimes on campus are as a result of fighting over money.
5) Think of the indignity that comes from some children being forced to eat food brought from their own home versus the kids who eat the bounty of nutrition provided from the State; honorable glories of the revolutionary harvest of institutional food, like hamburger pizza, Salisbury steak, SOS, macaroni and cheese and the like!
Think Steve, think of the children!
Outstanding! And scary, because I think a significant amount of people think that way…
Really, you’re probably right. Don’t let Demo-rats see this.
So the reference went over your head? Got it.
This is probably a Union payoff, but it could just as easily be part of the general liberal plan. You keep the kids in bad public schools, you keep them from learning what they need to know to survive in the real world, you keep them dependant on wefare and you keep them voting for you, plus you have free reign to feed them your propoganda.
You teach a man to fish, he eats for a lifetime and doesn’t need you anymore. (unless you destroy his fishing waters but that’s another story)
you give a man a fish and he eats for a day, and needs to come back to you for another fish.
Yes, for that is the only way we can achieve “social justice” and make every one happy and content! Left/liberal “social justice” educators (like Bill Ayers) acutall feel (can’t call it “think”) that way.
I never got a free lunch. Do these kids get one? My teachers weren’t unionized either. I protest. I was only an honors grad at uni. I had to pay for my tuition. I just want to complain now.