Get PJ Media on your Apple

The PJ Tatler

Bryan Preston


August 19, 2014 - 12:24 pm

President Obama promised to work with Republicans and to conduct the most transparent government in American history. But after he was elected, he came into his first meeting with Republicans refusing to listen to them because “I won.” He has built a habit of keeping policy making behind closed doors, beginning with the appointment of more policy “czars” than any previous president — czars bypass the Senate’s advise and consent process — and continuing with his current effort to re-write the nation’s immigration laws, because he feels like it and because a divided Congress cannot stop him.

WASHINGTON — When President Obama announced in June that he planned to bypass congressional gridlock and overhaul the nation’s immigration system on his own, he did so in a most public way: a speech in the White House Rose Garden.

Since then, the process of drafting what will likely be the only significant immigration changes of his presidency — and his most consequential use of executive power — has been conducted almost entirely behind closed doors, where lobbyists and interest groups invited to the White House are making their case out of public view.

The death of transparency coincides with the death of democracy — if he gets away with this.

Mr. Obama’s increasingly expansive appetite for the use of unilateral action on issues including immigration, tax policy and gay rights has emboldened activists and businesses to flock to the administration with their policy wish lists. It also has opened the president, already facing charges of executive overreach, to criticism that he is presiding over opaque policy-making, with the potential to reward political backers at the expense of other interests, including some on the losing side who are threatening to sue.

Democrats know that they’re going to lose the Senate this fall. That may leave Obama vulnerable to disciplinary action by Congress, but he has two gambits in hand to deal with that.

The first is the race card. The optics of a Republican Congress impeaching the first black president will be toxic.

The second, ironically, is the kangaroo case against Gov. Rick Perry in Texas. I debated a Democrat consultant on NewsMaxTV earlier today, and one of her talking points is that “both parties are doing” what the Texas Democrats are doing to Perry. She brought up the impeachment talk, of course neglecting to mention that most of that has been coming from Democrats, to force Republicans into foreswearing impeachment as any remedy to Obama’s actions.

Both parties are not doing what the Texas Democrats are doing to Perry. Their indictment of him is unique in Texas history, and is probably unique in American history. If they succeed, Perry will be jailed for decades. Life, in a worst-case scenario — for having done nothing wrong. A conviction would scramble Texas politics, though probably not enough to help the Democrats actually win any statewide office.

Obama is being sued by the House. Jail is not a possibility in that case at all. No one really knows what the House lawsuit can achieve.

Impeachment would not send him to jail either. The most impeachment could possibly achieve, and this is a remote possibility, is Obama’s removal from office. He would be replaced by his own vice president, of course, who would then be the incumbent for 2016.

But you watch. Democrats will denounce the Perry case nationally, and then use it to taint Republicans who aren’t doing anything that’s even remotely similar.

Bryan Preston has been a leading conservative blogger and opinionator since founding his first blog in 2001. Bryan is a military veteran, worked for NASA, was a founding blogger and producer at Hot Air, was producer of the Laura Ingraham Show and, most recently before joining PJM, was Communications Director of the Republican Party of Texas.

Comments are closed.

All Comments   (4)
All Comments   (4)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
"But after he was elected, he came into his first meeting with Republicans refusing to listen to them because 'I won.'"

The funny thing about that is, the person he said that to had almost certainly won his last re-election by a percentage spread ten times Obama's 2008 margin. If only the congressmen in that meeting had been in the mood to compare sizes it might have given the Unicorn Prince a dose of much-needed perspective.
27 weeks ago
27 weeks ago Link To Comment
We have reached a terminus of the democratic process. The Democrats have decided, quite consciously, that any and every tactic is acceptable in its efforts to gain and retain power: "might makes right." The Republicans have been neutered, in part by an unacknowledged admiration of the Democrats and in part by their own fecklessness, and will no longer oppose the Democrats effectively. The voters, meanwhile, are unable to renounce even the smallest of their "freebies" (for which they pay extravagantly and their children will pay still more) and so line up to perpetuate and worsen an unstable situation.

To be maximally gentle about it, this is unlikely to end well.
27 weeks ago
27 weeks ago Link To Comment
I kind of think Obama's immigration policy will turn out exactly like his Obamacare blitzkrieg. Any Democrat still out there with a functioning brain is going to see it as lasting damage to their party.
27 weeks ago
27 weeks ago Link To Comment
I don't know why there seems to be a fixation for impeaching/suing Obama. Holder is the really terrifying person in your govt: he has power over executing The Law, and he is a True Believer.
27 weeks ago
27 weeks ago Link To Comment
View All