Get PJ Media on your Apple

The PJ Tatler

by
Bridget Johnson

Bio

October 1, 2013 - 7:37 am

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) this morning suggested a one-week clean continuing resolution so that Congress can negotiate over the Obamacare provisions.

“One suggestion is that when we disagree, historically, we’ve gone to conference committee. You have Republicans in the House who want to alter or compromise on Obamacare. You have Senate Democrats unwilling to. So if you have a disagreement, you come together with equal number of Republicans, equal number of Democrats, and you find a compromise,” Paul said this morning on CNN.

Given Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s (D-Nev.) unwillingness to go to conference, Paul then suggested “we could pass a very short term, maybe not six weeks but what about one week so we can negotiate over a week.”

“I think a continuing bill to keep the government open while we negotiate is a good idea. I do agree that negotiating with the government closed probably to them appears like strong-arm tactics. So if we keep the government open, but I think it needs to be short-term enough that we are having an active negotiation, that we don’t just say, oh, we’re going to fund it for three months or two months and come back. I think if we did it for a week or two, I think we could still continue to negotiate, have a conference committee and really I think the American people do want us to work this out,” he continued.

Paul added “the interesting thing about this process is that we’ve offered a lot of different compromises.”

“Our first position really wasn’t so much a compromise. We don’t want Obamacare. We think it’s a bad idea and going to hurt people. So we offered to get rid of it completely,” he said. “But that didn’t pass and so we offered a compromise to say, look, you’ve been delaying other parts of it, why don’t we delay the whole thing for a year? That, I think, is a compromise position. That was rejected. We then offered to delay only the individual mandate. The president has unilaterally done it with the employer mandate. That’s another compromise that’s been rejected. Now we’re offering also a clean CR for a week or two. But then my understanding is that Senator Reid has rejected that out of hand as well.”

“…And while I don’t want to shut down government and I would be for short-term solutions to keep it open, I think we do sometimes have to make a stand and say enough’s enough. We’re spending our kids’ future and we can’t keep doing it this way.”

Bridget Johnson is a career journalist whose news articles and opinion columns have run in dozens of news outlets across the globe. Bridget first came to Washington to be online editor at The Hill, where she wrote The World from The Hill column on foreign policy. Previously she was an opinion writer and editorial board member at the Rocky Mountain News and nation/world news columnist at the Los Angeles Daily News. She has contributed to USA Today, The Wall Street Journal, National Review Online, Politico and more, and has myriad television and radio credits as a commentator. Bridget is Washington Editor for PJ Media.

Comments are closed.

All Comments   (2)
All Comments   (2)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
Sad to see that Sen. Rand Paul thinks that negotiation is still possible. Sen. Reid has made it abundantly clear that Senate Democrats will not give an inch.

Where is there a Henry to rouse us as we near Crispin's Day and we are hard to Agincourt?
28 weeks ago
28 weeks ago Link To Comment
Why do you need the government to be open to negotiate? Congress and the President are still being paid so you can still go to Congress and the White House to negotiate.
28 weeks ago
28 weeks ago Link To Comment
View All