Get PJ Media on your Apple

The PJ Tatler

by
Bridget Johnson

Bio

August 15, 2013 - 3:47 pm

Still trying to fend off attempts from some in Congress to take the handling of sexual assault cases out of the hands of commanders, the Pentagon today announced additional measures to combat sexual assault in the ranks.

“This effort requires our absolute and sustained commitment to providing a safe environment in which every service member and DoD civilian is free from the threat of sexual harassment and assault,” Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said in a statement. “Our success depends on a dynamic and responsive approach. We, therefore, must continually assess and strive to improve our prevention and response programs.”

The new measures announced are:

• Creating a legal advocacy program in each military service that will provide legal representation to sexual assault victims throughout the judicial process;

• Ensuring that pretrial investigative hearings of sexual assault-related charges are conducted by judge advocates general (JAG) officers;

• Providing commanders with options to reassign or transfer a member who is accused of committing a sexual assault or related offense in order to eliminate continued contact while respecting the rights of both victims and the accused;

• Requiring timely follow-up reports on sexual assault incidents and responses to be given to the first general or flag officer within the chain of command;

• Directing DoD’s inspector general to regularly evaluate closed sexual assault investigations;

• Standardizing prohibitions on inappropriate behavior between recruiters and trainers and their recruits and trainees across the department, and;

• Developing and proposing changes to the Manual for Courts-Martial that would allow victims to give input during the sentencing phase of courts-martial.

An independent review panel has been established to assess systems used to investigate, prosecute, and adjudicate crimes involving sexual assault and related offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Hagel said.

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), the lead proponent of taking sexual assault cases out of the chain of command, said these are “positive steps” but not good enough.

“It is not the leap forward required to solve the problem,” Gillibrand said. “As we have heard over and over again from the victims, and the top military leadership themselves, there is a lack of trust in the system that has a chilling effect on reporting. 302 prosecutions out of an estimated 26,000 cases just isn’t good enough under any metric. It is time for Congress to seize the opportunity, listen to the victims and create an independent, objective and non-biased military justice system worthy of our brave men and women’s service.”

House Armed Services Committee Chairman Buck McKeon (R-Calif.) applauded Hagel’s announcement.

“Expanding support for victims, promoting chain of command oversight, systematic review of sexual assault investigations and increased use of lawyer investigators are vital steps necessary for the kind of cultural change that will ultimately stamp out this crisis within the ranks,” McKeon said. “While many of these reforms reflect legislation the House has already overwhelmingly passed, I support Secretary Hagel for implementing policy changes he is already empowered to make. The House approved a range of sexual assault reforms more than a month ago and I hope that Senator Reid will move expeditiously to take them up when the Senate returns in September.”

The White House called the reforms “substantial, but only a step along a path toward eliminating this crime from our military ranks.”

But Sen. Richard Blumethal (D-Conn.) said Hagel’s directives just prove “once again why removing prosecutorial decisions from the chain of command makes sense.”

“The likelihood of unfair command influence is one of many reasons to remove prosecutorial decisions from the chain of command. Command influence is inherent and indeed essential in the present system – it’s called leadership, through condemning sexual assault,” he said. “By assigning prosecutorial decisions to an independent, specially trained and experienced prosecutor, the system can be made fairer to both victim and accused. Such a system is essential to better reporting by victims, because it avoids re-victimizing them.”

Bridget Johnson is a veteran journalist whose news articles and opinion columns have run in dozens of news outlets across the globe. Bridget first came to Washington to be online editor at The Hill, where she wrote The World from The Hill column on foreign policy. Previously she was an opinion writer and editorial board member at the Rocky Mountain News and nation/world news columnist at the Los Angeles Daily News. She is an NPR contributor and has contributed to USA Today, The Wall Street Journal, National Review Online, Politico and more, and has myriad television and radio credits as a commentator. Bridget is Washington Editor for PJ Media.

Comments are closed.

All Comments   (2)
All Comments   (2)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
Well, it seems like the problem people are recruiters and trainers who have easy access to their recruits and trainees; I wasn't aware that recruiters had that kind of access to civilians looking to enlist in the military but I've read where a lot of civilian prosecutors won't file on those civilian rapes cases, which has nothing to do with the military system. Seems like the obvious solution is have gender segregated training, except for the few people who are attracted to the same sex, and then ban the few switch hitters from the military. I still haven't figured out how the neo New Left changed their stripes from viewing the military as a fascist institution staffed with brutish soldiers as unwitting dupes and indentured servants high on testosterone to an equal opportunity employer where every college educated graduate has the right to be a soldier in a kind nurturing environment. Maybe if all those state side forts were not gun free zones there would be fewer rapes and Major Hasans doing work place violence?
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
"I still haven't figured out how the neo New Left changed their stripes from viewing the military as a fascist institution staffed with brutish soldiers as unwitting dupes and indentured servants high on testosterone to an equal opportunity employer where every college educated graduate has the right to be a soldier in a kind nurturing environment."

Maybe I'm just cynical but I have a theory about that. I suspect that the Left has decided that the military is a great threat to them, at least as traditionally constituted with strong, forthright, patriotic men with the ability to see when the Constitution is being ignored and the Republic is being weakened. I think the Left realizes that, in an extreme situation, the traditional military could likely be relied upon to end a "hostile takeover" of the government by the Left. Therefore, as part of their Gramscian "long march through the institutions", they are gradually weakening the military by facilitating the recruitment of lots of people that might be sympathetic to the Left and therefore NOT resist a Leftist takeover of the country. Bringing in lots of women and gays and bisexuals and transgenders and making the very careerist top leadership of the military expend epic amounts of time and money on sensitivity training, Muslim outreach and the like can only weaken the military and reduce their likelihood of opposing a true takeover of the United States by the Far Left.

I don't mean to imply that all females, gays, minorities, etc. in the military are Leftists or are unpatriotic. I'm sure many of them are fine, patriotic Americans. And I'm sure there are plenty of white, male members of the military who would be sympathetic to a more Leftist government. But, on average, I think the Left-supporting types in government and the military are doing what they can to weaken the military by increasing enrollment of those who tend to have the least opposition to the Left and hog-tying the whole military as much as they can on minor concerns like sensitivity to fellow service members rather than focusing on their main job, defending the country against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
View All

One Trackback to “Hagel Announces New Measures to Counter Sexual Assault; Gillibrand Not Satisfied”