Schumer’s GOP Negotiating Partner Calls Toomey-Manchin Gun Plan ‘Unworkable’
April 10, 2013 - 2:26 pm
Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.), who’s been talking with Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) about a compromise gun-control bill, dismissed the background check proposal put forth today by Sens. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) and Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) as “a good faith but unworkable plan.”
“The proposal will impose new taxes and unreasonable burdens on law-abiding citizens. The agreement also prioritizes collecting records over protecting citizens,” Coburn said in a statement. “As gun control special-interest groups admit, the proposal expands the government’s powers to record sales of firearms at the expense of expanding the scope of background checks. This is the wrong approach. Preventing sales to dangerous persons, not collecting receipts, will save lives.”
“The proposal also unwisely expands the government’s power to regulate and control the sales of firearms. A government takeover of gun shows will open more loopholes than it closes. Instead of paying a gun show tax, gun owners will simply handle those transactions elsewhere. The Manchin-Toomey proposal, unfortunately, trades a workable way to improve access the NICS database for a system that is not workable and will be extremely difficult to pass Congress and become law,” the senator continued.
“I entered these talks because I believe the American people want a common sense policy that respects their Second Amendment rights and freedoms while giving them the tools they need to make sure they aren’t transferring a firearm to someone who will be a threat to themselves or others.”
Coburn said he intends to offer a substitute amendment “based on many previously agreed to bipartisan reforms gun control advocates abandoned.”
“For instance, I’ll propose a consumer portal that would facilitate access to the NICS database at not just gun shows but for virtually all private sales,” he said. “While the Manchin-Toomey proposal is flawed, I commend them for their effort and look forward to the full and open debate the American people deserve.”