As I write, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s long-awaited testimony on the attack in Benghazi that killed four Americans is ongoing. In her opening statement, Clinton again said that she took “responsibility” without defining what that means. “Nobody is more committed to getting this right. I am determined to leave the State Department and our country safer, stronger, and more secure,” she said. “Taking responsibility meant moving quickly in those first uncertain hours and days to respond to the immediate crisis and further protect our people and posts in highthreat areas across the region and the world. It meant launching an independent investigation to determine exactly what happened in Benghazi and to recommend steps for improvement. And it meant intensifying our efforts to combat terrorism and support emerging democracies in North Africa and beyond.”
She went on to describe her actions that night. There were, she said, “No delays in decision-making. No denials of support from Washington or from the military. And I want to echo the Review Board’s praise for the valor and courage of our people on the ground – especially the security professionals in Benghazi and Tripoli. The Board said our response saved American lives in real time – and it did.” Fox and others have reported that there were denials of support from Washington that night.
Clinton’s voice broke when she spoke of the four Americans killed, and their surviving families. “For me, this is not just a matter of policy… it’s personal,” she said. “I stood next to President Obama as the Marines carried those flag-draped caskets off the plane at Andrews. I put my arms around the mothers and fathers, sisters and brothers, sons and daughters.”
According to one of those family members, Clinton promised to have a filmmaker arrested that day. And on that day, as she stood in front of those flag-draped caskets, she blamed a movie for the attack. The exact words she spoke on that day, September 14, 2012, are: “This has been a difficult week for the State Department and for our country. We’ve seen the heavy assault on our post in Benghazi that took the lives of those brave men. We’ve seen rage and violence directed at American embassies over an awful internet video that we had nothing to do with. It is hard for the American people to make sense of that because it is senseless, and it is totally unacceptable.”
She never once mentioned that movie during her opening statement today.
Secretary Clinton’s opening statement today was therefore stunningly incomplete, if not blatantly dishonest.






Secretary of State Clinton’s Stunningly Incomplete Opening Statement on the Benghazi Attack
What did you expect, the truth, the whole truth & nothing but the truth? Come on, get real.
There were, she said, “No delays in decision-making.
False.
No denials of support from Washington or from the military.
False.
We’ve seen rage and violence directed at American embassies over an awful internet video that we had nothing to do with.
And therein lies the problem Secretary Clinton – you & your incompetent cronies have nothing to do with anything that goes wrong.
Her incompetence is complete. She shows it by her verbally smart-assed manner in which she said ‘Senator’ to Sen. Johnson – in an entirely dismissive manner.
Anyone besides me remember the ‘General Betray-us’ crap that she would not disavow? Or her shrill “we have the right” to disagree with any administration – in a near hysterical scream?
And now this. What more do any Americans paying attention to the antics of this political whore that the last thing we need is to have this clueless wonder elected to POTUS in 2016? Trouble is there are too many of us paying full-time attention to our iphone/ipad/ipod etc to pay attention to iCountry.
THIS is what Hillary is all about. Not mere incompetence, but real evil. She sides with the Muslims at every turn.
Why did we even think we would get truth from this POS. No better than her betters.
I think I’ve found the biggest falsehood:
“I haven’t had a chance to testify until now”
????????????????????????????
(Insert explicative here)
Speaking of cronies, it will be quite telling if Huma Abedin remains at State once John Kerry is confirmed.
It’s Hillary, so the statement was blatantly dishonest. What did you expect?
She’s a modern day democrat so the statement was blatantly dishonest. What did you expect?
She’s a tool of Barack Obama, so the statement was blatantly dishonest. What did you expect?
She’s a politician….
Blatantly dishonest times four, completely predictable.
You forgot five:
Still married to Bubba, so the statement was … What did you expect?
(Actually, I fear, the list could fill a page, single spaced.)
The crux of the matter is what the Americans were doing in Benghazi and that question is not being asked. She does, however, open the door to that question:
“And it meant intensifying our efforts to combat terrorism and support emerging democracies in North Africa and beyond.”
I contend that what they were doing in Benghazi was purchasing wapons sent thre by NATO and shipping them to thee Syrian rebels.
And that is illegal since Syria is under sanction. It is exactly what happened in the Iran-Contra affair that resulted in criminal convictions of high government officials.
‘All-ee, all-ee, outs in free! = All government employees go public now !
The above is what the Obama administration should say, and never will.
Neither will they admit that everything which happened is recorded,
time stamped…and signed. There is no uncertainty here, only secrecy.
“There is no uncertainty here, only secrecy.” — And a disingenuous, ageing, Wellesley chick of yesteryear, to whom working for Saul Alinsky wasn’t quite good enough, still throwing tantrums. — Met the kind, many years ago; got to know how they “tick” (or not)! Good thing she’s leaving State. Kerry, bad as he is, could be an improvement.
What’s the worst that will happen to her after today? Who thinks her 2016 presidential candidacy will really be seriously damaged by all of this?
I don’t envy that these pols make so much money due to their insider knowledge while on these jobs…I only wish I could have a similar treatment under the law if I happen to falsify records, or commit perjury or some other offense that would otherwise ruin a normal citizen’s life.
Hillary will not be the party’s candidate in 2016. She is too old. Look at her from when she took the job in 2009 and now. She looks like my grandmother and no one will vote for my grandmother.
Exactly ! — Look at Moochelle’s “new bangs” and recall OFA’s rebranding as Organizing for Action. There’s your answer!
“Who thinks her 2016 presidential candidacy will really be seriously damaged by all of this?”
So right…this will be considered one of her “High Points” by the media….
Actual EVIDENCE of her ability to “lead” because:
She was “un-ruffled” by all the “turmoil and accusations”.
She “weathered the scrutiny” of a partisan investigation with strength and dignity.
This was her “trial by fire” and she did not “back down” dont you know?
As we watch the rest of Hillary’s rather defensive and evasive testimony with her frequent interjections of the emphasis of her accepting “responsibility”…that word over and over again, we’ll get a sense of a lot of “busy-busy-busy” stuff going on among and between too many people,too many committees, too much bureaucracy….on and on…. with too many diversions of other simultaneous crises developing, but no real sense of our [American] understanding of the cultural background for these individual in-country situations.And, as always, the pleas for more money.
I get the feeling that our State Dept personnel doesn’t really appreciate the great cultural gulf between us Americans and our Muslim enemies.
There will of course be vigorous disagreement on this from the State Dept Civil Service long-timers….but speaking as an American expatriate in East Asia and S.E. Asia during the 1960′s I never felt from my own very, very brief encounters with some of these guys that they were very impressive. Just not much substance. They’re career bureaucrats first and foremost.
….correction…”State Department personnel don’t….”
I won’t speak for “State Department Civil Service”, but some of the State Department FOREIGN SERVICE” do understand. Their analysis and comments are usually classified. Wikileaks actually showed that Foreign Service reporting was pretty accurate. Too bad that light is usually hidden under a bushel.
Correct. But people forget that the State Department is about diplomacy – keeping the peace and building bridges. This role can be exaggerated beyond the scope of reality, however. Diplomats may know the details – the facts on the ground – but the current administration doesn’t want to hear them. I think that’s true of many administrations. There were probably people at State who understood Vietnam pretty well. Nobody wanted to hear them, either. It’s all about high goals and public perception. When, like Obama, you’ve branded yourself as something new and different in American diplomacy and declared your enemies your friends, you de-emphasize anything that doesn’t look friendly.
No bad news, please, we’re busy saving the planet…
Whatever. Other people have different ideas.
Agreed.
When I [American] lived in Hong Kong all during the 1960′s and later in Laos the unofficial “word” was if in big trouble seek out the nearest British Consulate. It seemed that we Americans were/are too bureaucratic in our approaches. This seems to be borne out today by Hillary’s very defensive and angry-chip-on-her-shoulder stance at the witness chair today, and her much too often use of the word” responsibility” in the continuous context of “Hillary”….always wanting more staff and a bigger cash cache….sorry, that one just jumped out of my finger tips.
I think she’s going to be “smarting” after today for the rest of her life.
Frankly, after witnessing her and Obama’s nouveaux arriviste performances these last four years makes that “old white men” cliche looking better all the time. Noooobody has a bigger chip on his shoulder than our emperor with no clothes, Obama.
Compare her with Cordell Hull and even Henry Stimson, not to mention Henry “The K”. More Affirmative Action, anyone?
Hillary took “responsibility”? I don’t consider “Oops — my bad” to be taking responsibility or falling on her sword.
Hillary’s “voice broke when she spoke of the four Americans killed.” I wonder how long this wretched phony practiced that perfect, real-sounding break in the voice?
This little pissant dilettante, this social-climbing Evita clone, has afflicted our country for too long. It is a measure of the complete worthlessness of Obama as a leader that he would inflict her on the nation.
.
….”dilettante” is an excellent word…..sums up most of the career State Department personnel, they have very high opinions of themselves.
Except Hills isn’t a career State Department person – she’s a political appointee. By your reckoning, that makes her a dilettante among dillettantes. I won’t argue, though.
Bravo.
I can’t even watch, as the investigation already a foregone conclusion. The game is rigged and has been for years.
Democrats are accountable for nothing anymore, and the nation likes it that way – selective judgment and double standards are the norm. Leftists took over the courts before they took over public schools, made a national disgrace of both, and America still hasn’t figured that much out.
When a horse’s ass and entitled bully like Michelle ‘Antoinette’ Obama is our most admired, time to face up to the fact that our days are numbered, unless another path is chosen by those who see through this facade.
When this is over, Hillary Clinton will be a “victim” of a witch hunt, no different than her perjuring serial philanderer, possibly serial rapist, for husband. The only question that remains is which family member becomes the new Bernard Lewinsky.
This is kabuki theater, played for a country in which there is no longer a free press, and in front of a Congress that is unable to stop the building of a regime.
A majority of Americans has voted to re-elect this administration. They deserve what they get.
We deserve it too, because evidently we haven’t done enough.
Clinton has learned well from her lying dissembling husband and her skill in it is obvious. She never actually answers a specific question but digresses to the point of boiler plate. The Demorat Senators are a pathetic lot in that not ONE of them has actually asked a serious question of her. Most have actually praised this incompetent and lauded her miles traveled as SoS! Are the RINOs in the Senate actually going to let her off the hook and tip toe around her sensitivities? Only the process will reveal if their is a set of balls among them!
Does Hillary Clinton still have Huma Abedin as her aide? The family of Huma Abedin are members of the Muslim Brotherhood, and she worked for them. (See Andrew McCarthy on this.) How much money do the Clintons get from Saudi Arabia? Ultimately, it is President Obama who is responsible for not sending aid to those attacked in Benghazi.
“as her aide…”
Interesting word choice.I agree with the guy who says it’ll be interesting to see if Huna stays when Kerry is boss.
She is utterly unconvincing and untrustworthy. I want sailors, soldiers and Marines deposed. Give them immunity and protect their careers as well. There is criminality here that needs to be rooted out.
After her eight-year performance as Sgt. Schultz (“I know nothing ! I see nothing!”) on subjects ranging from Vince Foster to Whitewater, I don’t see why this should particularly surprise anybody.
Hillary knows what she wants, and she has no particular interest in who gets hurt in the process of getting it.
She wants Muslim domination of the MidEast, and probably everything as far east as the Bay of Bengal and south to Australia, for reasons dating back to her reflexive college anti-Americanism. As part of that, she wants Israel gone, erased.
As such, she will do anything she can think of to support “authentic Islamic causes”, without thinking too hard about the consequences of such “causes” being given free rein.
When the inevitable happens, and innocents die, she’ll do what she did before; claim she has no idea how it happened, and start a witch hunt for a scapegoat. As she did here.
In a couple of years, I expect documents to show up in a White House briefing room, showing that she and everyone else up to and including The One were told that they were dealing with an al-Qeada faction, and that said faction was planning to “hit” the ambassador. And she will claim she never saw them, and she will claim to have no idea how they got there.
Hillary is a perfect example of how delusional individuals with power are able to not only ignore “inconvenient” facts that contradict their preconceived notions until it’s too late, but also afterwards be utterly convinced that whatever went wrong is everyone elses’ fault, and never their own.
clear ether
eon
As always, its the Media’s fault.
When it was deemed “implausable” that Nixons Secretary could have accidentally erased that portion of tape, the media demanded to be “shown” how the Administration claimed that could have happened. We’ve all see the famous photo of Nixons Secretary in that impossible “game of twister body posture”.
It was an implausable explanation, and the media (then) was happy to question “the narrative” spun by the administartion.
Not so when the subjects are their idiological allies.
No one would dare say:
‘YOUR fingerprints, Mrs. Clinton, on documents found in YOUR bedroom…and youre youre saying you never saw them before, and dont know how they got there…I’m sorry, but tat just doesnt pass the smell test”
Or “But where does this “film” come in?..when DID you hear about the “film” and WHY was if such a prominent part of your “explanation of events” so soon after the attack, Mrs Clinton. Who decided to MAKE that part of the story”
The media are open co-conspirators with Democrats, and deserve the same FATE as them, when the day comes for Justice to be Served by Good and Faithful Citizens
I am way more disappointed in those that will question her … at least Hillary is somewhat predictable but the TOTAL lack of ANY meaningful and razor sharp questions and answers to them thus far; is an absolutely terrible indictment of what goes on in DC. God help us please!!!
This hearing is nothing but a dog & pony show, just something to do. None of these people want to dig for the truth in this matter any more than Hillary wants to reveal it. I hope the families of these four dead Americans sue the pants off the State Dept.
And nothing will happen. Even the four people who “resigned” at the State Department over Benghazi didn’t lose their jobs, they were just re-assigned to other desks within the State Department. This is really shameful, and I could just imagine, JUST IMAGINE, how Congress and the Democrats would be treating this if there was a Republican president in the White House. This just leaves people more angry, more cynical, and just proves that nobody in Washington is ever held accountable for anything. And you wonder why people have such a low opinion of Federal politicians.
The Mujahideen were the “database” of Al-Qaeda assets. Al-Qaeda are a controlled opposition force of the Central Intelligence Agency to promote their middle east destabilization process. To give empirical U.S. Military Industrial Complex a reason to invade wherever they want in the ever widening “war on terror” fraud.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifZK6SVlQ1Y&feature=related
The Mujahideen were the “database” of Al-Qaeda assets. Al-Qaeda are a controlled opposition force of the Central Intelligence Agency to promote their middle east destabilization process. To give empirical U.S. Military Industrial Complex a reason to invade wherever they want in the ever widening “war on terror” fraud.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifZK6SVlQ1Y&feature=related
I think I speak for many here when I say, “What the F. are you even talking about?”
Sometimes your rants and links make sense. In this case…???
There are survivors of the Benghazi attack, Americans flown to Germany for recovery. Congressmen who have tried to interview them have been stonewalled.
They are key to the truth, but as many have careers in government service, we may have to wait for the Democrats to leave the Executive branch to get the truth.
We don’t even know their identities. It is as if Congress were the enemy, and the Executive branch is hiding them, like in Argo.
I, too, have been astounded that we have heard NO testimony from any of the numerous other people who there when this all went down. One can only assume that they are being silenced by the Administration. Surely if their testimony supported the Administration’s “narrative” they’d be seen all over the place, on every MSM news program, constantly. The fact that the story is being played as if the four that were killed were the only people there that night seems very suspicious. I can believe that there was something very underhanded going on, even that the Administration was setting the Ambassador up to be kidnapped so he could be exchanged for the blind sheikh, and the plan went off the rails when the two CIA guys decided to ignore the stand down orders, and made the Islamist players think they had been double-crossed. With this Administration and the example of Fast and Furious, I can no longer discard such ideas out of hand.
Excellent! Post!
Bob Menendez & Dick Durbin bring up the issue of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq (or lack thereof) as somehow relevant to lack of adequate security in Benghazi. I guess the point was…”hey, republicans are worse.”
Like Joey Biden, Hillary insists no one at their (exalted) level had any knowledge of Ambassador Stevens’ longstanding complaints about inadequate security in Benghazi.
Hillary repeats all that was “handled” at the undersecretary level.
Hillary acknowledged that Libyan weapons are now all over North Africa but seemed affronted when asked about any connection between the annex in Benghazi and weapon transfers to Turkey.
Turkey she says, incredulous ? ASIF she’d never heard of such a preposterous idea.
Lots of drivel thanking Hillary for her million miles of travel on behalf of this country.
McCain and Rand Paul asked excellent questions, questions inspired by genuine disgust instead of BS.
Did you hear the Democrat callers to C-SPAN after the hearing? To them Rand Paul and John McCain were fools. How DARE they question Hillary about what was said to the American people after the attack. To quote Hillary: what does it matter?
No I turned it off at closing remarks.
I think Hillary is going to the House for similar questioning at 2 pm eastern time today.
Don’t know if I can stomach another session.
Ya gotta love those useful idiots – just doing their part for the cause. Even if they don’t know what the ’cause’ is. And would be horrified if they knew the end game.
Why 2 General officers relieved that day?
Why hasn’t anyone talked to any of the survivors yet?
Why was the Ambassador their that day (instead of at the actual embassy)?
What kind of op was the CIA running down the street?
Will anyone have the guts to ask and insist on an answer?
Hillary in 2016! Can’t wait for you all to cry into your soups all over again. Have a nice day.
Sure let’s install as prezzydent Ms. “I ain’t no tammy wynette standing by my man” the woman who said accusations of her husband diddling the intern in the oral office were “a vast right wing conspiracy”.
All that Hillary chicanery at the Rose law firm are sterling qualifications for office as well.
She is one very small step above the trailer trash she married.
I hope this helps.
Perhaps you won’t have to wait until 2016. Perhaps I can help convince the majority of the PJMedia family and millions who don’t care for you and your failed ilk, that we no longer need you nor want to be your countrymen.
I’m still working on my Patrick Henry speech.
– when testifying to remember to smirk and rest their chin in their palm.
“Responsibility”…she would not know what responsibility is if it bit her in the a**. A great line from a movie fits here: “You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means”.
Typical lying daughter of a female canine.
She’s got all the credibility of O.J. Simpson.
The military offered to send in security and State turned them down, not once but twice. It was more convenient for “State” if the group in Bhengazi ended up dead, then there would be nobody to refute “States” claim that the whole thing was precipitated by some obscure anti-Islamic video that almost nobody watched. This whole episode shows the Administration as the despicable political cowards that they are. Sacrificing American lives for political gain, just disgusting!!! Obama and Clinton have blood on their hands. Words cannot do justice for the contempt I have for these two anti-American traitors.
The only plausible “explanation” for Rice lying all over the airwaves, sundry administration underlings continuously backing up that story & a US President himself lying for 2 solid weeks after the Sept. 11 Benghazi debacle…
Is that a US election was imminent, that one of the major claims to fame in “foreign policy” is that Al Qaeda had been decimated as a function of our brave president giving the green light to kill a flea bitten old man…
And that, besides being an unwelcome distraction to the imminent election, that meme, that version, that complete lie had to be reinforced.
Hillary just lamely tried to back up that grandiose Obama claim saying, yes boys and girls, AQ has been decimated over in Pakistan and Afghanistan.
I love the way Rand Paul cleaned Hillary’s clock.
Rand Paul 2016!
He’s the man whocan start getting this country back on track after Obama’s 8 years of Hell & Bullshit!
If he’s the Republican nominee, he’s got my vote.
Hilary Clinton is an extremely evil woman. She represents the narcissism and self love of the American ruling class. She has been responsible for the deaths of so many Americans if we care to count the number of unborn children who were destroyed through the means of the American government and culture of abortion on demand which she so aptly represents. Evil like Clinton has become much more ubiquitous in the corrupt New American World Empire. Erasez l’enfame.
I find it interesting that the video in question never set off a shit-storm anywhere in the loony-bin islamic world as was claimed by Ms. Clinton and the admin even after they drew attention to it. Proving that it’s potential to inflame the loonies in the bizarro/islamo-world was quite limited – indeed – impotent. And who really thinks these islamo-fascists sit around watching utube videos all day just looking for a reason to riot?
The questions I have had all along are:
#1) Why was Stevens even in Benghazi?
#2) Why was the CIA in Benghazi?
#3) Who called off military backup?
#4) Stevens insisted on better security in Libya – was that for the consulate in Benghazi? If so then I’m back to insisting on finding a clear concise answer to #1.
With the gutless/ball-less wonders called GOP ‘leaders’ in DC I don’t suppose these questions will ever be answered.
Exactly, Paleo.
In a way, Clinton is right when she asks “What difference does it make?”
The only thing that Congress’ questions go to is whether there was a cover-up.
Who cares if there was a cover-up … if Repubs never bother asking what, exactly, the “video” narrative was supposed to provide cover FOR?
If all you commenters think these congressional hearings are a farce, you must not remember watching the congressional hearings concerning Waco. Remember, that was when her husband and Janet Reno murdered all those children at the compound of the religious nuts in Waco by sending in the US military. During those Waco hearings, questions presented by Democrats simply praised Bill, and questions presented by Republicans were so inane and uninformed that they were nonsense.
Bill Clinton got away with murder then, and Hillary will get away with these murders now. One true comment Bill Clinton made after he left office was when he stated that his biggest mistake was to appoint Janet Reno as Attorney General based on Hillary’s recommendation.
The U.S. military did not participate directly. It was all local cops, FBI, and ATF. The military provided armored vehicles and “advisers,” supposedly due to statements by Koresh that he had .50 and heavier weapons.
However, your statements regarding the “hearings” are well taken.
Yes, Bugs, you are correct. I just meant my statement to be more general. As I understand it, a number of those military “advisers” were heavily “engaged” (whatever that means) in the final assault; and it never was made clear who was doing the shooting from the chopper overhead – that supposedly killed a number of people who were trying to flee out the back when the fire started.
Congressional Republicans totally wimped out when it came to asking penetrating questions during the Waco hearings, and never even pressed the point as to whether or not any .50 cal (Barrett) rifles were actually found in the rubble.
Another point they never pressed was why Clinton and Reno did not order Koresh arrested during his frequent trips into town, when he could have been captured without incident by a couple ATF agents. It is believed Clinton and Reno deliberately wanted a serious military-type firefight to cower 2nd-Amendment advocates as to what would happen to them if they wanted a confrontation with authorities. And I haven’t even mentioned Ruby Ridge and its hearings.
If you have any further info on this, please advise.
“those religious nuts” had lived in peace with their neighbors for over half a century. They died in less than half of a Clinton term.
Hillary uses the men in her life as her Jungian shadow: homicidal, violent, depraved, sexually omnivorous, dark shadows. she preys on weaker, smaller, poorer, less credentialled, lower- education women. She always has. She’s an enabler more brazen than a serial killer’s life partner.
Clinton is just another scumbag liar out to protect herself (that’s number one). And what is up with Clinton (once again) wearing that Islamic green uniform? Showing where her true loyalties lie?
Leftists are by definition miserable, angry people; it’s amusing to watch one angrily feign furious indignation.
Hillary was inadvertently honest in one new thing that may have been a contributing factor in Amb. Stevens’ death.
She said he represented State’s new hiring standards to the Muslim world at meetings in Abu Dabi.
On those new security officer application forms, in Arabic, was the USA’s policy to favor the hiring of the homosexual.
Think about that for a second.
Amb. Stevens educated all of the Arab world about how pro-gay the USA was in hiring policy.
An Arab world where the mere status of looking twee can get you arrested.
Actual homosexuals are often honor murdered.
Others are arrested and tried and found guilty.
Then they might be sentenced to re-education or prison, even death.
And this morning hillary admitted she put Amb. Stevens as the point of the spear on this issue in the Arab world.
Delay testifying for as long as possible and then yell “What difference does it make NOW?” Gotti? Madoff?
When she was running against Obama in the primary, I said she had more balls than he did. Now it looks like she has more than the entire Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Rand Paul made a fool of himself, “worst tragedy since 9/11!”. He showed he has zero credibility on the affairs of state. And Ron Johnson tried to act all statesmanlike and utterly failed, seeking blame rather than a solution, and Clinton pawned him. Sorry, the Benghazi horse has been flogged to death. Time to move on to doing something that actually helps the American people instead of just trying (and failing) to tear other people down.
In the afternoon session, she seems to be handling all questions adeptly. It doesn’t hurt her that some questioners ask their toughest question right when they are out of time so they will receive a written response.
Love her or hate her; she’s the A Team, they aren’t, and it shows.
Lord help us is Hillary is the A Team. Has this country sunk so low? Never mind, I just answered my own question.
Like most of his breed, D-White gives credence to style over substances.
This single element of style is what helped Barack so much the first time around, sycophants with tingles up the leg, one alleged “conservative” nearly swooning at the perfect crease in Obama’s pants.
Your lords and masters rely on your ignorance.
Dwight is a flunky who would grade academia ‘A’ team – a definite ‘D’ lister on the comments board. Brutus is such a left-wing toady, his comments aren’t even worth the trouble of responding except to mock – a groupie of lame propaganda.
This vast right-wing conspiracy nag completely made up a story of being fired upon on disembarking in Kosovo, then claimed she misspoke; something that used to be referred to as bald-faced lie. That’s Dwight’s idea of the ‘A’ team. Is it any wonder he’s confused about everything else?
Clinton’s baggage would fill the cargo of 747, her pathological liar for husband the hanger.
There is also her claim to be named after Sir Edmund Hillary, whose ascent of Everest (and subsequent fame) happened six years after she was born.
Joe Biden has similar pretensions to grandiosity, lied about a landing in Iraq under enemy fire. Last week, he claimed to be playing golf near a school shooting and hearing the shots, something like that.
A complete fabrication springing from Joe’s (“the plagiarist”) desperate imagination.
OK, are you trying to tell me that they are the A team and she is the B team? It may irritate you, but as Bill O’Reilly would say, “you know I’m right.” Hell, even Col. Ralph Peters, who never misses a chance to whack a lib, acknowledged how impressed he was by her performance. Eat your hear out.
Democrats are never held accountable for their actions and the MSM will never expose them because they are Democrats, too. Obama and Hillary have done so much damage to our national security and there are many Americans who have no idea what is going on in the international arena. They are too busy watching “Dancing with the Stars” or watching some stupid reality show. They like living vicariously, and corrupt politicians like Obama and Hillary love it. The dumber their voters are, the better!!!!
President Obama and Hillary Clinton are heroes to the left. In reality, Hillary is a master manipulator and liar. She had the best teacher, Bill Clinton. I pity the young people of this country. They have no idea what’s in store for them in the future.