The Daily Mail is reporting that the Met Office, the qauisi-government weather forecasting agency in Great Britain, quietly issued a new study that shows “no discernible rise in aggregate global temperatures” for the last 16 years.
The figures, which have triggered debate among climate scientists, reveal that from the beginning of 1997 until August 2012, there was no discernible rise in aggregate global temperatures.
This means that the ‘plateau’ or ‘pause’ in global warming has now lasted for about the same time as the previous period when temperatures rose, 1980 to 1996. Before that, temperatures had been stable or declining for about 40 years.
The new data, compiled from more than 3,000 measuring points on land and sea, was issued quietly on the internet, without any media fanfare, and, until today, it has not been reported.
This stands in sharp contrast to the release of the previous figures six months ago, which went only to the end of 2010 – a very warm year.
Ending the data then means it is possible to show a slight warming trend since 1997, but 2011 and the first eight months of 2012 were much cooler, and thus this trend is erased.
Some climate scientists, such as Professor Phil Jones, director of the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, last week dismissed the significance of the plateau, saying that 15 or 16 years is too short a period from which to draw conclusions.
Others disagreed. Professor Judith Curry, who is the head of the climate science department at America’s prestigious Georgia Tech university, told The Mail on Sunday that it was clear that the computer models used to predict future warming were ‘deeply flawed’.
Even Prof Jones admitted that he and his colleagues did not understand the impact of ‘natural variability’ – factors such as long-term ocean temperature cycles and changes in the output of the sun. However, he said he was still convinced that the current decade would end up significantly warmer than the previous two.
Is anyone surprised that the media forgot to cover this story? Absolutely remarkable that the Met Office would release this report the way they did. If it showed an increase in temperature, you can bet it would have been banner headlines from one end of the western world to the other.
Meanwhile, back in cloud cuckoo land, California is ready to implement its statewide cap and trade scheme, guaranteed to destroy what’s left of its economy.
But it’s for the kids, don’t you know?
Which kids do they mean? The ones they’re not having, so they can “leave a small footprint?”
“saying that 15 or 16 years is too short a period from which to draw conclusions.”
Unless it supports their agenda, of course….
Ironic that they quoted Phil Jones, one of the now disgraced “high priests” of the Church of Global Warming, saying these results are not significant. (Who’s the ‘denier” now, Phil?) Two years ago, he admitted in a BBC interview that there had been no statistically significant warming since 1995: http://goo.gl/jQ8R That was in the wake of Climategate, when the University of East Anglia and the CRU were under siege after revelations of manipulated research and downright falsification. I guess he’s recovered enough now to insist again that what we can plainly see isn’t the truth.
Didn’t the qauisi go extinct during the warming?
Hope it’s not actually cooling.
The Roman warming period was followed by the mini Ice Age. Not to say that an ice age is on the way but, the mini ice age affected food supplies. Maybe, just maybe, we should consider what impact if any that a cooling period might have on world food supplies instead of hybrid cars that very few can afford. Long summers mean bumper crops. Short summers not so much.
Of course. Even the kool aid drinkers know this which is why they now talk about “Climate Change” instead. Next they’ll be warning us about the threat of Climate Stability to the eco-system.