Bill Clinton saw several women in the White House.
But that’s not what Hillary means.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Monday the United States will have a female president in her lifetime — but it won’t be her.
Clinton said at a town hall meeting in Kolkata, India, that she wants to see “that final glass ceiling broken,” The Associated Press reported.
“I think that there will be an election that will elect a woman” to the White House, she said.
Clinton added, however, that the American political system is “about the most difficult to navigate, for men and women, particularly for women, but we’re going to keep trying to encourage that final glass ceiling to be broken.”
I’d just like to see someone in the White House who a) loves America, b) knows what they’re doing, and c) will live within the Constitution. Race, gender etc are irrelevant.
I realize those three points are very broad, but Obama has shown that if any of the three are absent in a president — you pick which of the three are absent, and you can pick more than one — we’re inviting disaster.
Great, just what we need: More appeasing, more enabling, more “fairness” (man, I loathe that word more and more each day), more neutering, more emasculating, more debt, more programs, more government meddling and intrusion — and no more competing. Who put the socialists/communists in power here?
There, I wrote it. Let the rebuttals begin.
President Sarah Palin?
She already did. Her name was Monica Lewinsky. Be careful what you wish for, PIAPS. Cheers -
I’d love to see a woman in the White House. Unfortunately, a conservative woman Presidential candidate is almost by definition unelectable. Absolutely no doubt in my mind that our first female president will be a left-wing nutjob, possibly one who will make Obama look like Ronald Reagan. Sorry, no Margaret Thatchers around here. Try again in a hundred years.
A left wing woman president will do the same for gender equality that a left wing black president has done for race relations. . . . set it back 50 years.
– PUMA worked out well for you, Ms. Rodham.
Another glittering sample of feminist bias from The Beast. Gender trumps all as long as the gender is female and no one dares utter a peep.
Imagine the estrogen firestorm if any male public figure stated that he just wanted to see men elected. He would be run over by the Pink Bus and buried by the MSM.
The Year of the Woman drags on into the War on Women while more women than men go to college or hold jobs. There are “women’s issues” and “women’s health care” with no male counterparts. Money for breast cancer research dwarfs money for prostate cancer research even though many more men die of prostate cancer than women die of breast cancer and on average, women live significantly longer than men. But it’s still not fair.
Yes, it’s not fair that the white house hasn’t been handed to a woman yet, even though there are more women voters than men. The only bright spot I can see here is that it sounds like The Beast may be taking herself out of the running.
Maybe Joan Rivers, as the American liberal Democrats cannot get enough of her Anne Frank jokes……….