Despite “welcoming Peter Beinart with open arms” at J Street’s annual conference in Washington, the group’s executive director said that he doesn’t support the “Zionist BDS” proposal put forth by the journalist.
Beinart, in a New York Times op-ed last week, called for a boycott of goods manufactured in West Bank settlements.
J Street chief Jeremy Ben-Ami told a roundtable of reporters today that the group has not supported the Boycott, Divestment & Sanctions movement. When asked by a writer whether there is a situation under which J Street would support BDS, he answered “no.”
He sung Beinart’s praises while stressing he disagrees with him, echoing a blog post he wrote on the J Street site a week ago.
When asked why there was a BDS panel offered last year at the conference but not this year, Ben-Ami said it was a matter of programming variety.
“That’s more a matter of trying to find more things to talk about,” he said.
The executive director also stressed he’d like a greater variety of representation on the panels but felt many wouldn’t agree to come for fear of being stigmatized as associated with the group. “We would be very happy to have on our panels far more people who disagree with us,” he said.
“There are going to be people attending this conference” who say things J Street doesn’t agree with, he said, noting that he doesn’t “think it’s appropriate to use the word ‘apartheid’ in describing Israel.”
“That’s just the nature of the beast. We are not dictating the acceptable vocabulary of everyone who walks in the door.”
Nearly 2,500 people registered for this year’s conference, which Ben-Ami said “demonstrates continued growth of the pro-peace movement.”
J Street activists will be heading to Capitol Hill to lobby tomorrow, but Ben-Ami said their strategy focuses heavily on grass-roots outreach in synagogues.
“There’s a very vast set of allies out there: Muslim, Christian, atheist,” he said. “We are proud to have non-Jewish allies but the identity and core will always be inside the Jewish community and reflect Jewish values.”
“It’s a critical year for choices that need to be made in the political realm,” he said. “Our vision is one where friends of Israel stand up for strong American leadership to achieve two states.”
Ben-Ami said they are lobbying for as much attention to be paid in Washington to the Mideast peace process as the Iranian nuclear threat.
“You can’t pick one threat or one crisis at a time to address,” he said.
“We want to see the administration take a much more proactive role,” he added. “This next phase is clearly defined by the 2012 election.”






“You can’t pick one threat or one crisis at a time to address,” he said.
What a ridiculous thing to say. Of course you can. We all do that every day.
That comment alone shows that Ben Ami should not even be at the table when discussing something as serious as this.
Given that the Whilte House and the elite liberal crowd keep promoting J Street as if it had anything to do with the Jewish community and Israel it might be a reasonable strategy to work with them at some level. They claim to be “pro Israel” they should be held to account for that and not get away with what they have been up to so far while only giving lip service to pro Israel issues.
I dont know that it will make any difference. J Street and the like still will not admit that their approach, even if it had some merit 30 years ago when there was some prospect of a two state solution, is dead in the water. The Palestinians simply do not want it. Any peace agreement short of all the Jews just leaving, is an admission of defeat and they will not do that.
In the meantime Israel can keep offereng whatever degree of autonomy they can given secrity considerations, but not much else. When you go to the table and your side keeps offering solutions and the other side simply rejects there is no negotiation going on. You cannot get anywhere from there. It must be a two way process.
From Camp David on the Palestinians have never presented a proposal. Only demands for unilateral concession prior to talks that go nowhere. What these guys do not get is in that situation the best option for Israel is do nothing. Just build your own people, economy, and security and see what happens. Eventually something will change.