In May of 2011, news broke that while the Obama administration was not pursuing gun control legislation, it was pursuing gun control “under the radar.” As a candidate for the presidency, Obama had professed support for the Second Amendment, while earlier in his career he had portrayed himself as very much on the side of gun control advocates. In May, he sought to reassure gun control advocates that he was really still on their side.
“They’re doing a pretty good job … as Obama has said, ‘under the radar.’ There’s a lot going on under that radar,” Gun Owners of America Director Larry Pratt said, referring to a remark Obama reportedly made in a private meeting with gun control advocates. “They’ve shown us how much they are prepared to do through regulation.”
Pratt pointed to two proposals in particular. Under one proposed rule from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, dealers in four Southwestern states would be required to report multiple sales to the same person of certain kinds of rifles. The proposed requirement — which would apply to dealers in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Texas — is open for comment until the end of May. The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence claims the change would help the ATF “crack down” on Mexico’s gunrunners.
Who are “Mexico’s gunrunners?” CBS reporter Sharyl Attkinson reports that thanks to a little-known State Department initiative, the Obama administration itself is one of Mexico’s main sources for firearms. Many of those firearms coming from the US through this program end up in the hands of Mexico’s hyper violent drug cartels. And the State Department’s oversight of all this is pathetic.
The problem of weapons legally sold to Mexico – then diverted to violent cartels – is becoming more urgent. That’s because the U.S. has quietly authorized a massive escalation in the number of guns sold to Mexico through “direct commercial sales.” It’s a way foreign countries can acquire firearms faster and with less disclosure than going through the Pentagon.
Here’s how it works: A foreign government fills out an application to buy weapons from private gun manufacturers in the U.S. Then the State Department decides whether to approve.
And it did approve 2,476 guns to be sold to Mexico in 2006. In 2009, that number was up nearly 10 times, to 18,709. The State Department has since stopped disclosing numbers of guns it approves, and wouldn’t give CBS News figures for 2010 or 2011.
—
The State Department audits only a tiny sample – less than 1 percent of sales – but the results are disturbing: In 2009, more than a quarter (26 percent) of the guns sold to the region that includes Mexico were “diverted” into the wrong hands, or had other “unfavorable” results.
Both the State Department and gun manufacturers argue that the sales help US foreign policy, but it’s hard to see how. I suppose it keeps a few gun makers employed, but too many of the guns themselves end up with the cartels in one way or another, and are used to destabilize our southern neighbor and make our border with Mexico more dangerous. The Mexican military recently reported that as many as 9,000 guns are missing.
The spike in Mexico’s drug war violence may at least at one time have been part of the Obama administration’s “under the radar” effort to promote gun control in the US. After all, that effort was supposedly about going after “Mexico’s gunrunners.” Attorney General Eric Holder, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and President Obama had all publicly slammed US gun makers and sellers, citing statistics that our “lax” gun laws allowed many guns bought legally in the US to end up in Mexico (mostly left out of those arguments: the fact that our porous border also allows guns to move both ways across the border). They clearly connected our gun laws to Mexico’s violence — for what political purpose did they do that?
Both gun makers and sellers, it turns out, were selling or walking thousands of guns into Mexico within Obama administration programs. The Obama administration may have been the largest of Mexico’s gunrunners. At least in the case of the State-approved sales to Mexico, this is still going on. When confronted with questions about the other program that allowed thousands of firearms to walk their way into Mexico’s drug war, numerous administration officials lied to Congress. For what political purpose did they do that?
h/t Hot Air






Sharyl Atkinsson, CBS News: “The US has quietly authorized a massive escalation in the number of guns sold to Mexico through direct commercial sales”
Los cárteles dicen “Muchas gracias a Barack y Hillary”
What do you have to say about your boy Mr Navarrette?
Navarette can’t stand Obama. For the “wrong” reasons, of course. Just felt I should correct that. I would have a 170 degree turn in my general disappointment with Ruben if he would drop the amnesty bit and harangue Obama on Fast and Furious. Apart from the 2nd Amendment assault, these arming schemes are payback to the California Democratic infrastructure who are composed of those fighting Sinaloa cartel and its offshoots and the cartel itself. Notice how the Zetas are always the pinched ones – it would be a “bad investment” by Obama, seeing that Zeta descendants are more commonly seen in Texas (50% chance of voting R anyway) or in new-immigration states (e.g. southern states) where they may not be sticking around long enouch to vote.
Who are “Mexico’s gunrunners?”
Uh….Eric Holder comes to mind.
This is an all out assault on the second amendment, plain and simple. If they are able to seriously curtail the second amendment, get the Defense Authorization bill passed and keep Obamacare the US will be as bad as any country we criticized 20 years ago as being an oppressive dictatorship.
I guess that is why DaOne, and company is always wearing the UN puke blue color. Gun control for the world, and the last nation State must be changed.
Treason pure, and simple.
I’m surprised that you need to ask what purpose was served by our own government’s gunrunning to Mexico. It was to prove Obama’s premise that “90% of the guns flowing into Mexico come from the US,” of course. And it was a political move to bolster the American gun control advocacy, also known as “disarming American citizens”. How much clearer can that be?
What makes it worse is that this administration didn’t have enough practical smarts to realize how it would get out of their control and become the fiasco it has become. For this terminal stupidity alone, we need a new administration, and a whole new governmental policy.
Two avenues of investigation I have yet to hear anyone else advocate:
1. If guns are flowing in one direction you can be sure money is flowing in the other direction. Follow the money.
2. Mexican and/or Central American leftist movements. You-know-who is clove-and-orange with them.