The LEAST Interesting Man in the World
Who is the LEAST interesting man in the world?
We all know “The MOST Interesting Man in the World.” Long greying beard, a lot of girlfriends. He doesn’t always drink beer, but when he does, etc., etc.
But the LEAST – it’s a more difficult decision. So PJ Media and PJTV set out on a search a few weeks ago, just about the time the RightChange crew was working on “The Most ARROGANT Man in the World,” and, lo and behold, we both came up with the same person.
Arrogant? Uninteresting? Somehow they go together.
Anyway, here’s “The LEAST Interesting Man in the World” — PJ Media/PJTV version. (Feel free to suggest new versions in the comments — the possibilities are endless. Who knows — PJTV may use your suggestions for a sequel. Or make it yourself and we’ll link.)
Well thats funnier than a rubber crutch!
As insufferable as he is now it’ll only be worse from Nov 6th until Jan 21st when we can finally be rid of this very uninteresting man. Is there anything worse than a narcissist who has been rejected?
I was going to read the article, but, after I saw your post, I knew, I had been correct: most likely, it’s about our Obama and, after his ordering the killing of an Am citizen with the drone attack, for me, there’s just nothing more of interest to read about him.
And by the way, Cicero did the very same thing, . . . going outside of the civil law for alleged treason, . . . and, we all know what happened to Cicero on account of his bragging about it—don’t we?
Well, for the unlearned who may be among us, Cicero was butchered, . . . his head and hands were hung at the senate’s podium as a statement of regard against those who disregard the orderly process of civil law, . . . nothing further for me to know about Obama, . . .
Wow, you hafta stop reading “History” books written by Victor Davis Hanson. Cicero executed men he considered traitors (their exact political motivations are unclear at this remove in time, but the only people who hated him for it were the ones who eventually overthrew the Republic) He was butchered, as you say, to satisfy Marc Antony’s desire for revenge. I know Roman Analogies for the Ignorant is a regular game around here, but at least try to inform yourself, ok?
Why is a liberal’s first, last, and only order of business always to rant about how “ignorant” his adversary is (and, by implication, how superior he is)? In this case for the strange reason of the person replied to not describing of Cicero’s demise in proper historical context. Because when I look for a way to describe an ignorant barbarian, my first thought is, “why, he’s even been inaccurate about Cicero’s biography on an internet forum”!
(By the way, I thought all knowledge is relative and we shouldn’t be teaching people anything about slave-owning imperialistic white dead males like Cicero anyway?)
Well, I can’t speak to “a liberal’s” reaction, but I can say that the person I was responding to IS ignorant of the events they used as an analogy. If you think I’m wrong on the facts as we know them, offer an argument. In what sense am I “inaccurate”? There is no such thing as Cicero’s biography. There is Plutarch’s “Lives”, interesting reading, but hardly scholarship in the modern sense. There is a large extant collection of Cicero’s letters, collected after his death by his aide Tiro (I believe? could have the name wrong), but again, these are his opinions about his actions, and no one ever accused Cicero of undue modesty.
Long story short, if you want to murder politicians, grow nuts big enough and buy a gun. Don’t troll some wingnut website with fake history in an attempt to legitimize your childish revenge fantasies.
Also, Skeptic? I know syntax is hard, but if you’re going to pop off in public and not address any of the issues I called the guy on, at least try to make your reply conform to it. I have no fuggin’ idea what the last half of that ‘graph even means.
Your silly straw-man gambit notwithstanding, the only people I consider myself “superior” to are people I am, well, smarter than. If that stings, you have my sympathy. Pick up a history book written by an actual historian, and remedy the matter.
Hate mail can be directed to sdhwy0@yahoo.com decent porn is always appreciated, as well.
Unfortunately, we won’t really be rid of him. Like Jimmy Carter, he’ll be a living reproach for ever and ever because we weren’t good enough for him.
“…he’ll be a living reproach for ever and ever..”
Didn’t you mean “living cockroach” for ever…”
least interesting is mitt romney.
Marzan: I don’t need interesting. I’d settle for competent, which Romney at the very least, is. I don’t need hip, or cool, or even the smartest man in the room, in the White House. I’d settle for decent, intelligent and competent. That’s all. Whatever Obama could have been, nobody (and I mean NOBODY) thought he would be this bad. And yet, Blacks are turning white, and the Whites are turning away. His mendacity is astonishing!
“And yet, Blacks are turning white, and the Whites are turning away.”
Umm, what does that even mean? Black people are turning White, because Obama? Are they not gonna vote for Obama? Proof? Or, did you and the rest of this clown car of a webpage just pull your “data” out of your asses?
The funniest part, for me, is how you all seem to think Obama is some kind of stealth tyrant who stole the election, and you’re VERY upset about that, but Mitt Rmoney, who shares none of your values or concerns, basically bought/smeared every serious Conservative candidate that popped up, and continues to lie his ass off, and all you people just line up and pretend he gives a rat’s ass about anything but endless war, and tax cuts for billionaires. But I’m sure it has nothing to do with Race, right?
If you’re wondering, say about mid-november, “Mitt Rmoney (pampered rich kid) knows the economy ’cause he was born rich” is where we decided to kick your asses.
Game On…
I agree completely. Bush was supposed to be the guy we would love to have a beer with. Obama was the super cool intellictual. Both turned out to be incompetant boobs. Romney may not be super fun or cool, or a college professor, but at least he has some real achievements that required real competance, based on something other than just the ability to fool people, like building a very successful company at Bain (as Clinton said, a sterling record)and turning around the olympics. Unlike most of the lying boobs we seem to pick as presidents, Romney has had great success doing things that required real leadership and management skills.
This country has survived bad presidents and will survive bad presidents in the future. The question with obama is, can we survive a dangerous president?
Those who still support him are true enemies of the USA, communists, marxists and your basic jew haters. Which one are you?
Yeah, Romeny is soooo uninteresting… so much so that the news agencies and late night “comedians” have spent much more time on his wealth and his wife’s horse than anything to do with Obama. I guess if Romney is uninteresting, then Obama so that much worse… unless their is a massive amount of bias. Naaah, news agencies and late night “comedians” are NEVER biased…
Obviously being paid by the post. Drone on.
Hit back twice as hard, eh, Barack?
That was hilarious.
If Obama gets four more years, I’m going to need something a lot stronger than Dos Equis beer to drink.
Something like… poison.
Spirit, let me know what kind you want, and I’ll gladly send you enough money for a double dose.
This was actually a better video than the most arrogant man. Keep it up.
After this week’s OfA Bridal Registry fiasco, I suggest a short film entitled, “Obambi meets Bridezilla.” I see PJTV’s credits rolling over Bam talking incessantly; a giant 4″ inch stilletto putting him out like a cigarette butt; and of course, thanks to the people of WE TV for arranging bridezilla’s appearance.
The LEAST interesting man in the world has got to be Herman van Rompuy, the President of the European Council.
How many folks here can cite anything he has said or done in his entire political career?
And I’ll bet that not one in 50 Americans ever even heard of him.
Are you applying for the position of least relevant person in the world?
I’m just answering the original question.
Since the U.S. is a superpower, what any POTUS says or does will be consequential.
Keep making videos like this all the way to November. There’s an endless supply of material. The joker in occupying the White House can’t stand the ridicule. How ironic that Chairman ObaMao is a perfect candidate for the essential Alinsky treatment!
Last week I saw a video clip along the same line but it was entitled “The most arrogant man in the world”. It is also funny.
There’s a Toby Keith song, “I Wanna Talk About Me”. I’m surprised someone hasn’t already used that for a video montage of Mr. Obama.
Wasn’t there a radio personality in the 1940s-1950s who made the hateful, frightening KKK into a laughingstock organization, by making them the brunt of his jokes (grown men wearing sheets)? The jokes made them irrelevant, less scary, & little.
I remember Obama’s 1st bid to become president, it was understood that no one was allowed to jab him with a few jokes. Now that the media has crossed that line (Don Rickles & Conan O’Brien jokes), it’s just a matter of time before everyone laughs at his incompetency & idiosyncrasies, thus making him so “has-been.”
Roger, thanks for the video. I watched it 5 times & kept on laughing. Looking forwarding to watching more of these Obama videos!
the most deluded man in the world
the most petulant man in the world
the most dangerous man in the world
the least manly man in the world
“Vote often, my friends.” Unfortunately it will only be the least interesting man’s thug army that will employ that strategy.
I have to get a paper towel and wipe up the coffee I’ve spit all over the keyboard. This is too good.
The least interesting man is so un-interesting, we have forgotten, but for him, the current least interested man would never have been elected; did you forget John McCain?
I have not met in person the least interesting man in the world, but I CAN tell you what car he drives, for it parks in my neighborhood and is festooned with all the expected bumper stickers, right up to and including “Recall Scott Walker”.
The thing about him is this: You can start a conversation about anything, including the weather, and within seconds he is droning on about some new aspect of socioeconomic unfairness, about the stupidity of the electorate that keeps voting contrary to their (obvious) self-interests, about the continuing hangover from the ill-spent Bush years after the SCOTUS handed him Kerry’s job, Reagan’s whatever-he-did/said-but-it-was-cruel, the latest and most egregious boycott target, GOP obstructionism in the Congress, racial hatred of the POTUS, US arrogance and Big Oil colonialism, offshoring all the decent jobs, environmental negligence, union busting, and several other “blue meat” talking points.
He is SOOOO uninteresting that you actually start looking forward to getting to the GI doc on time for your colonoscopy. “Gotta, go, sorry … have a doctor’s appointment”.
You’re thinking, “talking with this guy is my second favorite thing in the world, ranking just below driving a hot rusty nail into my eardrum with a hammer.”
Solution: Puke on his shoes on the pretense that ‘contact with things unknown’ got you that way.
Mac and cheese with grape juice beforehand. Better yet, seek him out on purpose.Let him babble awhile and, ‘Blammo’!
Do it for America and all she represents…….
I like Uncle Kevvie’s suggestion… but if you can’t puke on cue, just look him in the eye and say, “Dude, you’re boring!” and walk away. He probably won’t ever bother you again.
(Do this only if you don’t need to deal with him on an ongoing basis and if you believe he’s essentially harmless and wouldn’t call a SWAT team on you in the middle of the night…)
Sharing a dinner table with the current occupant of the Oval Office would be pure torture. Do you think for a second that he would inquire sincerely about your welfare or thoughts and opinions? The machinations of his mind would be seeking ways to make himself ascendent.
How the black community can support this flaccid person is beyond me. He has nothing in common with the enslaved people who toiled and died to help build this nation, and whose ancestry goes back hundreds of years on this soil.
I was a little ticked off by this post/comment thread, but not any more. Now, I love you guys! If this is the best I can expect for arguments (he’s arrogant! he doesn’t care about people!(??) he’s boring!) come November, Dems have this one in the bag.
Why Glenn Beck isn’t on the VP short-list is beyond me…
Come on – when you’re describing uninteresting things/people the responses to said things/people are going to be uninteresting at best.
And FWIW I don’t see you waxing poetic over Zero…
Seems nobody does.
Actually my nominee for least interesting person would be Harry Reid.
How about the most affirmatve actioned nincompoop in the world?
Well, I would say that Hillary Clinton is one of the most uninteresting men in the world, but Obama is a good choice, too.
huh-huh-huh, it’s funny ’cause Hillary is really a woman, but she has bigger balls than shipley130. Get it? GET IT??
I know you won’t believe me, but Vagina really won’t bite you. You should give it a try sometime, it’s AWESOME!
But it doesn’t count if you hafta use roofies, fyi…
Too bad someone can’t do a mash-up of the old Apple commercial and put Obama’s face in place of the bespeckled guy on the screen droning on and on to the demoralized and dehumanized robotic schlubs dressed as prisoners. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYecfV3ubP8
Learned years ago that to help people help themselves, you must, rhetorically, kick them in the butt.
As such,on November 6, 2012, it is imperative that logic minded Americans kick the “Amateur’s” butt out of the White House.
The image of a circus barker selling snake-oil to gullible bumkins seeking some form of absolution for not doing more for minorities best defines the person we have lent our Oval Office to.
Think about it: He’s the Least Interesting Man in the World. That’s interesting.
It reminds me of a (flawed) proof that there’s no such thing as an uninteresting number.
The proof is by contradiction: Suppose uninteresting numbers exist. Let x be the uninteresting number with least magnitude. That makes x really interesting, contradicting the supposition that it’s not interesting.
The flaw in the above proof is assuming that a set of numbers always has a member having least magnitude. It doesn’t. Consider the set of real numbers > 0. There is no member of that set that is less than all of the other members.
The set of humans, however, is finite, so a theorem that there is no human which is least interesting might hold.
It’s always projection with you people,isn’t it? Obama is less interesting than Romney?? What’s next?… Obama hates Mexicans?… Obama belongs to a weird 19th century polygamous cult fouded by a convicted con-man/pedophile?… Whatever your politics are it is hard to believe that anyone could consider Willard to be more “interesting” than the first black president in American history.
Jesus california: Whatever your politics are it is hard to believe that anyone could consider Willard to be more “interesting” than the first black president in American history.
If the only reason to think Obama is interesting is because he is the first black president, then we are really in for serious trouble if he actually gets re-elected. What does he have to offer? Failed economic policies, hatred of Jews and Israel (which is btw one of the only countries in the middle east that is friendly to America. And his usual “chin up in the air” pontificating on how it would be so much easier if he had not inherited that great deficit from Bush, is pathetic and at most a lie. The Dems had control of the House and Senate for the first 2 years and they got NOTHING done. Except push us into the biggest deficit in the Western Hemisphere.
With a strangle-grasp of Progressiveism, Tammanyism, later-century Marxism, Alinsky,some of the New Left, Liberation Theology, and human-caused climate change (the new original sin), and with concentrating on the certain evils of deductive reasoning, President Obama is so predictable that one can pay no attention to him. Ask self what a Progressive community organizer with that background would do, and you have your answer.
– anyway. Remember how it was to have to suffer Arnold for several more years.
“I rarely tell the truth, but when I do, I hide it under executive privilege.” –The least interesting man in the world
You’re joking. No sober person believes Obama is less interesting than Brand X Romney.
If he’s so uninteresting, why do you folks work so hard to explain him to each other? And why do your explanations reflect reality so poorly?
It is possible that the object of a compulsion can be trivial or, as you so deftly put it, ‘uninteresting.’ But to be a compulsion it also has to be unproductive, counterproductive, or wasteful; otherwise, it’s just thoroughness. Your attentiveness to this ‘uninteresting’ man is in fact profitable. It may deliver you the white house (though it will deliver it to a person who, like George Bush, is extremely unlikely to improve your party’s standing or realize your party’s expressed goals.) So you’re not obsessive or compulsive; you’re just greedy and are willing to cash in anything of value to achieve what you have chosen as your object. Here’s what you have, or are trying, to cash in:
The traditional reputation of the GOP as fiscally conservative. Your ignorant base is starting to notice that you are the party of debt, waste, and economic failure. They may not notice it in time to turn the ’12 election against you, but they can’t be kept this stupid and this self-damaging for long.
The traditional reputation of the GOP as strong in foreign policy. The positions that the squirrel-crazy far right have required of their candidates, and the woefully wasteful and bloody policies of GW Bush, are piling up in American consciousness. Those will be attributed to the GOP, if only because you’ve trained them to oversimplify. Now Barack Obama is the tough guy, the effective fighter of terrorists, the Kissingerian pragmatist–all the things you used to be. Your mockery of Obama as a foreign policy president is so baseless and inconsistent that only those perfectly inoculated against evidence–Christians and bigots, mainly–can apply Occam’s Club thoroughly enough to imagine an actual argument. For the rest, it’s the smirk and incredulous head shake.
The conviction that experience means anything at all. Simon, with his exaggerated resume, that foolish hat, and his proud Gordo Libby paranoia, is a prime example. Bluster marks the coward, and aside from the head-shake/smirk bluster is all you have. I mean, you people actually listen to Yoo and McCarthy. If they said tomorrow that the president could crush a child’s testicles if he so desired…oh, hang on, they already said that. Testicle-crushers in edgy hats, that’s who you have. I almost wish for the days of Buckley, with his infantile books about sailing and wine.
Economics and science. Again, it works because your base still would rather eat up your propaganda and go hungry, but for how long? To make it work you have to keep your voters stupid. The longer the voters are stupid, the stupider the writers and personalities get, or the more venally hypocritical. Neither of those characteristics are likely to last long. We must hope that the collapse of your campaign to outstupid the electorate comes before long-term damage is done, but my god! You’ve got senators building igloos on the mall and constituents believing it, when the snowstorm itself is part of the blizzard of evidence that the senator is a fool. That’s funny and all, and one day it may seem quaint; and of course it’s politically adroit, just like kiting checks or shoplifting is fiscally adroit, for four or five days.
Are you all so shortsighted?
ice9
Patriotism, hope for the future, some semblance of philosophical, logical
Kordo, thanks for doing the dirty work of responding to the gelded goonsquad. I know, it’s rough for the god-botherers, the trust-fund goldbricks, the TeaParty tightwads, and all the other crybabies in Powerline America- the other white meat.
First, you embarassed yourselves by insisting Dubya was the absolutely bestest president evah! Even as he revealed himself to be a dolt with a meanstreak, you doubled down: the ninny in the flightsuit smirked “Bring it on!”, and you all collectively creamed in your pants. You gave him another 4 years, because it wasn’t enough that he destroyed our foreign policy and decimated our military- he still needed to completely wreck the economy. Well, done and DONE! So, your anointed hero stands revealed as the worst president in a century.
Strike one.
Pissed and addled with shame, you now decide to get behind the biggest phony in American politics: John McCain. But, it gets better. You all turn into drooling, dipshit-fanboys of the newest, nastiest, bimbo in the Fox universe: Veep-to-be Sarah Palin. Well, that turns into another right-wing nightmare. And here you all thought that running against a black guy was gonna be a piece of cake. So, your second attempt to show us how smart and tough you are turns into another pathetic illustration of your relentless ignorance, nastiness, and you-know-what (it whymes with wacism).
Strike two.
And now, the next president- the very next one after your man Bush- is not merely a Democrat. He’s Black…but he’s White, too! Damn! He can read, he can write, he can speak! Double-damn! Intelligent people respect him. Decent people, even those who disagree with him, seem to genuinely like him. He inherits the ugly mess your political bagmen dumped on all of us, and actually proceeds to pull us back from the cliff; he makes a number of heroic, if flawed, efforts to provide us with some decent governance; he gives a voice to those you and your party have worked to disenfranchise; he finishes up the overseas dirty-work lazy-bones Bush was too inept to complete. He does all this while being cheerful, well-spoken, and respectful of your opinions. And during all of this, what strategy do the Powerline poltroons decide on? You relentlessly announce your unhinged hatred for this guy; you express nothing but contempt for the majority of your fellow-citizens; you embark on a reckless campaign of political obstructionism unparalleled since the Civil War. And so, you now stand revealed to the the American public, in all your fear and resentment.
Strike three.
Roger, not many video ideas offered but here are a couple.
A series of clips of Obama running down the steps, running up the steps, striding manfully to the left, striding proudly to the right, waving to the cameras. doing everything except John Kerry’s push-ups. Where’s he going? Running up the national debt. Running down the Senate Republicans. Running over the cliff. Waving off criticism.
There’s a popular Mexican song whose refrain is “Aye, Aye, Aye, Aye.” Pick up on that and add changes to “My My My My” and” Me Me Me Me”, with a parody on his immigration non-policy.
You’re welcome.
Stuart: be specific. Has Obama raised the national debt? Has he raised it more than Reagan? than Clinton, than GW Bush? Has he raised it by raising spending, by increasing government? Or has he raised the debt by failing to end the Bush tax cuts? Has he raised the debt by failing to curb healthcare spending? Has he raised it more than Bush did with Medicare D? Has he raised it by prosecuting wars in Iraq and in Afghanistan, or is that debt perhaps shared with someone else? Has this congress spent more than the previous ones? Has this congress cut spending and debt? Or perhaps has the debt risen because revenues fell in the worst recession since the Great Depression? Has the debt risen or fallen? Can you honestly articulate the difference between a debt and a deficit? Do you assert that debt is bad always, or is there a situation where debt (or deficit spending) is a positive? Has the debt and/or deficit risen because taxes were cut in stimulus deals, or cut by Bush, or cut further by Obama? Be careful now…there are facts out there.
ice9
So now Obama is the least interesting person in the world. This doesn’t comport very well with what you said about him before–that he is clinically insane, as clearly proved by the fact that he gave a 17 minute answer at a town meeting. If Obama were an insane president, wouldn’t that make him very interesting to watch, as he made strenous efforts to hide his condition (at those moments he was aware of it?)
But of course, you and I know that you and your friends are just constantly looking for any nasty label you can pin on B. Hussein Obama.
Jan 31, 2012 George Soros support Mitt Romney, investor/communist and Obamas supporter want Mitt Romney. It’s not a good day for a republican to get support from communists. On Fed 2 Donald Trump announced his support for Mitt Romney. It can’t be a good day for a republican when Obama supporters see Romney as a good option.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6aLQU_nYSM