Get PJ Media on your Apple

Belmont Club

Retreat Hell Yeah

April 15th, 2014 - 9:16 pm

Don’t write a check your a** can’t cash. Never draw a Red Line that you’re not prepared to enforce. Don’t threaten consequences you’re not prepared to impose.  Never make as if you’re drawing a weapon against an armed man and come up pointing your finger. Some people learn life’s lessons after a while.

Some people never learn. Time magazine  reports that the White House has backed the Ukrainian government’s efforts to suppress separatism on its eastern border with an expression of support. As for tangible help, nada.

White House Backs Ukraine’s Eastern Offensive.

The White House says it supports the offensive against separatists in the country’s eastern provinces, which began Tuesday 25 miles north of Slovyansk and could expand to 10 cities throughout the region

The White House said Tuesday it supports military action taken on Tuesday by the interim government of Ukraine against separatist militants across the eastern part of the country. …

U.S. officials say there are no current plans to provide weapons to Ukraine, the Wall Street Journal reports. Officials estimate there are roughly 50,000 Russian forces deployed to the country’s border with eastern Ukraine.

The Voice of America carries a similar account. “WHITE HOUSE — The Obama administration has suggested that Ukraine’s operations against pro-Russian separatists are justified, but that the U.S. is not considering providing lethal assistance.”

US Backs Ukraine’s Separatist Crackdown

Without going as far as stating U.S. support for the Ukrainian government’s decision to send in tanks and troops, White House spokesman Jay Carney told reporters the United States appreciates Ukraine’s pledge that it will act responsibly and gradually against the separatists who have taken over government buildings and other facilities.

This brings to mind Obama’s “support” for Syrian rebels without providing any “lethal assistance”.   The president once again declares he stands ready to support his allies to the limit of his teleprompter. But about all else he has provided besides are a few containers of MREs.

One might well ask: of what does the administration’s support consist except an shouted exhortation from well to the rear to advance “responsibly and gradually”? It’s a phrase that sounds more like an slogan against drunk driving than the tocsin of resistance.

An endorsement without muscle may be worse than no endorsement at all.

Comments are closed.

Top Rated Comments   
This brings to mind Obama’s “support” for Syrian rebels without providing any “lethal assistance”.

Calling these Shariah loving and Christian hating and Christian raping and Christian murdering sub-animals "Rebels" is even worse than calling those invading America from third world countries "Dreamers" and "It's only Love". It is intellectually and morally depraved.
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
Maybe it's just me but if we are going to get into another war, I would rather it be with Mexico, not Russia, as it is Mexico, not Russia, that has tens of millions of invaders in America.
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
I am not looking at a 20 year horizon. You cannot plan for the long term if you are about to be terminally handed your nether regions in the short term. We may be able to survive until either the scheduled end of the current regime, or until he does not leave and we will be too preoccupied with internal matters to deal with foreign affairs. The long term measures will not even be started till after Obama is gone, if then.

I stand by what I've said in the last couple of threads, and ask the question again:

"If Obama and his Federal government were actively working to destroy this country in all ways, foreign and domestic; what would he and they do differently than is being done now?"

Subotai Bahadur
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
All Comments   (161)
All Comments   (161)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
Why bother even cutting the check , if your assistance isn't going to be of any value.
14 weeks ago
14 weeks ago Link To Comment

✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤

Start working at home with Google! It’s by-far the best job I’ve had. Last Wednesday I got a brand new BMW since getting a check for $6474 this - 4 weeks past. I began this 8-months ago and immediately was bringing home at least $77 per hour. I work through this link, go to tech tab for work detail

✒✒✒✒✒✒✒✒ www.workbarr.com

✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤
14 weeks ago
14 weeks ago Link To Comment
"Obama has a wonderful knack for snatching defeat from the jaws of victory."

What is considered a defeat and what is considered a victory depends on what side you are truly on. For the radical left, of which he is a part, these are all victories over that most despised and powerful of enemies, the USA as it was before Jan. 2009.
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
Um, actually... would you please remind us of those victories we might have had if only Obama hadn't danced so hard to turn'em around????
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
The left seems to be in the business of losing wars. First cutting off funding to VietNam when Nixon was crippled by WaterGate. Then pulling out of Iraq. Now they're trying to reverse the outcome of the Cold War.

15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
The Vision of the Anointed:

Self-Congratulation as a Basis for Social Policy

Sowell presents a devastating critique of the mind-set behind the failed social policies of the past thirty years. Sowell sees what has happened during that time not as a series of isolated mistakes but as a logical consequence of a tainted vision whose defects have led to crises in education, crime, and family dynamics, and to other social pathologies. In this book, he describes how elites—the anointed—have replaced facts and rational thinking with rhetorical assertions, thereby altering the course of our social policy.

https://www.google.com/search?q=The+Vision+of+the+Anointed%3A+Self-Congratulation+as+a+Basis+for+Social+Policy&oq=The+Vision+of+the+Anointed%3A+Self-Congratulation+as+a+Basis+for+Social+Policy&aqs=chrome..69i57&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=122&ie=UTF-8
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
Related at that link:

The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism

The End of Racism: Finding Values In An Age Of Technoaffluence

Men In Black: How the Supreme Court is Destroying America

Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left from Mussolini to the Politics of Meaning

America Alone: The End of the World As We Know It

Free to Choose: A Personal Statement
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
Let's face it: With our NEA "educated" populace and MSM we just can't win:

With a Pub in office, they cheer for the enemy abroad.

With a Dem, they cheer the enemy at home, always reserving the loudest for themselves.
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
You mean like when Russia invaded Georgia in 2008, and there were no repercussions?
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
One of many reasons, if not the primary reason Russia went into Georgia? Militant Muslims were using it as a base of operations, crossing the border and spreading chaos, death and destruction in Russia. The Georgians were too broke and too corrupt to fix the problem, themselves.
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
Bad example. Putin wanted very badly to overthrow the Georgian government, and failed. Bush did not back him out of two small slices of Georgia, most likely because 1) they were already full of Russians, and 2) he was busy elsewhere, and 3) wasn't worth the risk of all-out confrontation. If Obie had been President, it's quite possible that the Russians would have moved further south and finished destabilizing the regime in Georgia until it collapsed.
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
I heard that a movie is being made of William Brinkley's novel, "The Last Ship" (1988). Best nuclear war/post-apocalypse novel ever written, IMO. About a nuke war between U.S. and U.S.S.R. that virtually destroys the world. The only apparent survivor is a U.S. Navy ship (and crew) stationed in the Barents Sea ... and maybe a few others.

A really riveting tale.

Brinkley is the author of "Don't Go Near the Water."
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
Similar tale by Huxley:

"Ape and Essence"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ape_and_Essence
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
As a youngster, I thought I had read a significant portion of Huxley's works.
Little did I know:

https://www.google.com/#q=aldous+huxley+books
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
"The story in the script is punctuated by a series of vignettes centering on a society which is much like 20th century human society, but with baboons substituted for men. These brief scenes serve to further satirize human society and depict it as brutal, warlike, and stupid.

The opening scene shows two Einsteins, tied to leashes held by baboons on either side of a pair of baboon armies, facing each other and preparing for battle. They are then directed to operate machines which release "improved" disease-causing clouds at the opposition. This scene expresses the belief that society's most intelligent figures are exploited by ignorant warmongers, and the hopelessness of a society in which every party seeks to annihilate all others.

Several of the vignettes portray a female baboon singing sensually to an all-baboon audience "Give me, give me, give me detumescence..." :-)

Other vignettes involve apes performing various human activities, ape armies assembling, and other more surreal imagery."
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
John F. Kennedy’s assassination on November 22nd, 1963,
overshadowed the deaths of two prominent authors:

Aldous Huxley and C. S. Lewis.
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
NATO was ever only a veil behind which the US could exercise military power. It was OK as long as the US was led by people who cared about US interests, and the war-ravaged EUroscum knew their place.

However, American Fascists (or the Left, as they call themselves) idolize those sophisticated EUroweenies. Clinton & Soetero began to allow EUrotrash to use NATO (i.e. American assets) to accomplish narrow European objectives, eg the destruction of Serbia, the dissolution of Libya into civil war.

If Barry Soetero wants to deserve a Noble Peas Prize, let him pull the US out of NATO. It is now as worthless as the UN. Let's leave Europeans to solve European problems as best they know how. If that ends up with Germany as a tributary to the new Russian empire, so be it.

It is not isolationism to demand that the other men (or metrosexuals, in the EUnuch case) in the arena stand on their own feet.
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
As one of the boomer generation I grew up in the protection of our nuclear umbrelly. I have NO memories of wanting to hide in a bunker, except for a few weeks in October of 1962... I **DO** remember the violent rebellions in Africa that cast out the European colonial governments... the death of Dag Hammarskjöld - the last UN Secretary-General who was not clearly hostile to the U.S. - in a plane crash in the Belgian Congo, slaughters of whites, slaughters of Indian merchants, slaughters of untold numbers of blacks by other blacks, as continues to this day...

But as for the current flaccid leadership of Europe, we have to remember that in the GREAT WAR, Britain and France AND Germany each lost about a third of their men between the ages of about 18 and 30. So many tens of millions of dead fathers, that there were almost as many children raised without a father as had one.

In the U.S. since WWII, we have accomplished about the same result by SOCIAL WELFARE PROGRAMS that penalize women if the father(s) of their children live in the same household. We have managed to produce several feral generations without killing off the fathers in the sort of vast bloodletting that created similar conditions in Europe of the 1920s.

I guess that's progress of some sort.
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
Siggie,
1. Boomers are on station. As always.
2. Reconfig of Poisiden's (Polaris long gone) to conventional is a big deal, requiring major US based missle overhaul. When launched they look just like a nuke. Not good. (ps. nukes are small and relatively light compared to a convential weapon of any value, throw weight from missles is small)
3. Sub launced Tomahawks, conventional or nuke are launced from torpedo tubes. And look like cruise missles when launched. Remember Russia is NOT a MENA nation. A launch that looks bad is bad.
4. Russians know the boats are there.
5. Surface ships and aircraft can lauch Tomahawk and other types of cruise missles...see above.
6. B-1s et al can and do operate from US Bases. All bomber missions to Afg/Iraq were from US bases. Again, Russia is not Mid East and would see them coming.
7. As well and truely explained below, it isn't a matter of capability.
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
Posidon was phased out over 20 years ago. Now the USN and RN have only Trident FBM's.
We looked into conventionally armed ICBM's, (CBMs). They are still on the drawing board, so to speak. I personally think the USN's FBMs are the best platforms for them, since launch from USAF ICBM bases presents some safety challenges, and per treaty ICBM's cannot be stored within 100 KM of the Cape or VAFB.
By the way, the French silo-based ICBM force is gone. And when it was there it lacked the range to hit the USSR.
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
what happened to all of our LA class "boomers"? Wouldn't it make sense to position them in strategic waters and let Putin know that we are operating close in with conventional missiles and tactical Polaris nukes? Move a squadron of B-1's to Poland too. Hell they should be all paid for by now.
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
Los Angeles class submarines are NOT "boomers'. They are "fast attack".

Moving a squadron of B-1's to Poland would only put them within range of Putin's forces.

Stick to signals intelligence please.
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
.
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
you could still play your missiles battles on a computers

US 1 point,

Russia, 1 point

BOOMM !
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
Are French nuclear missile subs still in service? How many? Just curious.

Where do they cruise, I wonder. In the Atlantic? Or do they go really far away, say to the southwest Pacific, to avoid detection.
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
if there are french nuclear missiles , YES

how many, don't really knowbut enugh to ruin a third of Russia

where they cruise? don't know, secret defense ;-)
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
If I were Putin I would have sent Russian MREs to the Bundy ranch.
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
Or Good Russian Vodka...just sayin...lol
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
They're not mutually exclusive.
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
@ lambat and roughcoat below.
I care not who is right or wrong or noble or ignoble. I care about minimizing Russian influence outside its borders, with the caveat that they sit on lslam as much as possible.

I guess I am suggesting a Real Politic for the next few decades...encourging Russia to help distract Islam by being 'Russian' inside her existing borders and not creating too much mischief elsewhere. Putin too, has a sell by date.
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
I am all for realpolitic with Russia; not sure what's best though. They'll use Islam as a)permanent war in Chechnya for internal purposes and b) a force against the west (Big Game) through its proxy Iran. Spengler says that the worst that could happen is that Russia gets close to China. But how are either of those affected by how close Kiev is to Brussels? Probably Bolton is right and our best strategy is to put them out of business by bringing hydrocarbon prices down.
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
if you bring the hydrocarbures prices down, then you'll earn less money too, I read that QE isn't the big solution anymore for raising the Employment rating
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
US foreign hydrocarbon sales are not about export income Lower prices in a world wide commodity increases US domestic economy...others, like EU just get yet another free ride. sheesh.
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
yeah but your genious in Washington proposes your shales gas to the EU
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
QE never was anything but the debasement of the currency. Historic action of a broke tyrant.
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
Putin does not want a bloody conflict in the Ukraine. The Russian economy is in worse shape than ours. (Hard to believe, I know.) If we placed defensive weapons and cash in the hands of the Ukraine government, it would promise that any effort to overrun and annex East Ukraine would be costly and bloody. That is not what Putin wants. He can't afford it. As long as he can get what he wants on the cheap, he will do it. He has goals, but he also has limitations.

Stronger economic sanctions would create some pain for us and would be decried by the Euro-weenies, but could also be used to good effect. A President who wanted to thwart Putin's ambitions would be willing to use all the above.
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
The Ukraine government lost 6 armored vehicles as its soldiers defected. You want to this government more weapons? Seems like a bad idea until Ukraine gets some stability.
15 weeks ago
15 weeks ago Link To Comment
1 2 3 4 5 Next View All