Get PJ Media on your Apple

Belmont Club

Toward a More Perfect Tyranny

June 5th, 2013 - 7:05 pm

The Guardian writes that “the National Security Agency is currently collecting the telephone records of millions of US customers of Verizon, one of America’s largest telecoms providers, under a top secret court order issued in April.” That would be in April of this year. After the obligatory mention of President Bush the Guardian goes on to admit that it might have something to do with President Obama.

Under the Bush administration, officials in security agencies had disclosed to reporters the large-scale collection of call records data by the NSA, but this is the first time significant and top-secret documents have revealed the continuation of the practice on a massive scale under President Obama.

The unlimited nature of the records being handed over to the NSA is extremely unusual. Fisa court orders typically direct the production of records pertaining to a specific named target who is suspected of being an agent of a terrorist group or foreign state, or a finite set of individually named targets.

A copy of the court order is here. The question of who is in power often matters less than what power he has.  Once the definition of enemies is expanded sufficiently to include people with contrary political view then eventually the necessary trawl must include everything.  It was Gerald Ford who put his finger on the paradox at the heart of the big government agenda.

The first seven words of the Constitution and the most important are these: “We the People of the United States …. “We the people ordained and established the Constitution and reserved to themselves all powers not granted to Federal and State government. … They know that a government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have.

And yet somehow there remains on the Left the belief that the process of expanding government power can continue indefinitely — for good causes like regulating 16 ounce softdrinks  and ensuring that none but bureaucrats can possess firearms, to be sure — without ever getting to the point where it can seize telephone records, wiretap news agencies or use the IRS to crackdown on political opponents.

It can’t.  Power corrupts. And what is more it usurps.

As G.S. Kava observed in his book, no government can actually exercise such total control over a population. No government is ever as all-powerful as it pretends to be. At most it can create the counterfeit of omniscience. To maintain the illusion, they must put the imposture itself beyond question.

Governments typically do not possess enough members to coerce the rest of the populace without the active support of some of those outside the government. Rule by fear … requires that citizens remain ignorant of matters about which people, unless severely inhibited, are likely to communicate with one another: their attitudes toward the ruler …

Hobbes observed that “reputation of power is power” … in other words, a sufficient appearance of political power constitutes real political power … an appeal to mutual expectations may be needed to explain … obedience … a government’s power consists in the mutual expectations of its citizens that their fellows view it as having power over them. These are the main lessons of the paradox of perfect tyranny.

The Paradox of Perfect Tyranny can be restated in this way. Tyranny exists only for as long as we believe that others will do what we won’t. The moment people start talking among themselves they are surprised to learn that this expectation doesn’t hold.

In reality government doesn’t have a fraction of the ability people think it has. It can’t give you a good living. It can’t pay your rent or your gasoline.  Certain Obama supporters think it can but it can’t. It can’t give you “free” health care. They too have to find the goods, the services from somewhere.

In the end the only reason people believe it can do these things ex nihilo is because they think other people believe them too.

When Christopher Swindell writes in the Charleston Gazette that government can bomb everyone into submission he is not stating a fact. He is stating a belief  contingent on people doing what he thinks they will do.

We put the president in the White House. To support the new NRA president’s agenda of arming the populace for confrontation with the government is bloody treason. And many invite it gladly as if the African-American president we voted for is somehow infringing on their Constitutional rights.

Normally, I am a peaceable man, but in this case, I am willing to answer the call to defend the country. From them.

To turn the song lyric they so love to quote back on them, “We’ll put a boot in your —, it’s the American way.”

Except it won’t be a boot. It’ll be an M1A Abrams tank, supported by an F22 Raptor squadron with Hellfire missiles. Try treason on for size. See how that suits. And their assault arsenal and RPGs won’t do them any good.

But who did Swindell ask?  Nobody but himself and his echo chamber. If he had cast his inquiries further afield, he might have discovered not everyone thinks that way.

The breakdown point often occurs when enough people realize there is neither a Free Lunch nor Legitimacy in arbitrary power. The problem every tyrant faces is the discredit of the Narrative. Because it is the Narrative which confers the bulk of actual power.

Things start to go south with the realization that things aren’t free; that bureaucracies aren’t omniscient. It is neither because it consists of and ultimately derives its sustenance from actual people.

Maybe one day the Guardian is going to realize that there is no Perfect Tyranny and no wisdom in wishing for it. You can’t vote for a Messiah and not expect a theocracy. Any state powerful enough to build a Worker’s Paradise is not only the Serpent’s Egg but a fantasy — a kind of political and economic perpetual motion machine that exists only in the minds of the statist faithful. The downside to constructing a Frankenstein monster only becomes apparent when it comes for you.

But having done it once, one shouldn’t do it again.  Fat chance of that however, as the Left will probably vote repeatedly for people like Obama under the theory that if big government failed the last time it was only because it wasn’t tried hard enough. But how big does it have to be?

What is particularly disturbing about the FBI and NSA’s data collection program is that it relies on secret jurisprudence — secret court orders — which themselves rely on secret interpretations of the law by the administration itself.  Nor do things stop there. The implementation of these secret orders is also secret. The chain of events is completely submerged from beginning to end, almost as if it were ashamed of itself. Yet how could there be shame or embarrassment in this, the most ethical government in history?  One that is always ready to hold forth on the moral arc of history? On the special character of its leading members? The administration claims powers it tells no one about; obtains court orders veiled by national security and then conceals the actions pursuant to this process under pain of criminal prosecution.

Recently the President reluctantly agreed to share the administration’s secret legal reasoning justifying its drone assassination program with lawmakers.  And he did so only as part of a deal to confirm John Brennan to the Central Intelligence Agency.

In a reversal, President Barack Obama will allow lawmakers access to secret documents outlining the legal justification for drone strikes that kill US citizens abroad who conspire with Al-Qaeda.An administration official disclosed the move Wednesday on the eve of a Senate hearing on Obama’s nomination of his top White House anti-terror adviser John Brennan to lead the Central Intelligence Agency in his second term.

What powers the President thinks he has is classified.

Things are now at the point where the FBI can secretly ask secret courts to do secrets things on the basis of secret powers that nobody knows it has. That’s a lot of power. If government has to get still bigger, borrow more money, obtain more authority, disarm more people, regulate more drinks to fix things then perhaps it’s time to recognize that it maybe the Perfect Tyranny is the problem itself.

The Three Conjectures at Amazon Kindle for $1.99

Storming the Castle at Amazon Kindle for $3.99

No Way In at Amazon Kindle $8.95, print $9.99

Tip Jar or Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Comments are closed.

Top Rated Comments   
I wish I could +1000 this.

Let us also not forget that Obama had some *very* skilled data analysts working for him in both of his Presidential campaigns, but especially in 2012. Remember "microtargeting"? Just imagine what those guys could do with a DB of every domestic phone call and text in the US? IIRC, a lot of these wunderkind went through the revolving door to work for Google, but I wouldn't be surprised if some of them ended up at the Puzzle Palace or perhaps at that huge new data warehouse in UT.

I guarantee you this is just the tip of the iceberg, and if the whole story ever comes out, it will probably shock even cynics such as myself.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Conservatives may make up half the country but the key affinity groups in it are much smaller. The IRS investigations, for example, were not directed at conservatives en masse, but at the key nodes. The IRS episode suggests the administration is interested in self-identified social networks.

What traffic analysis would show are the non-identified, or even non-selfidentified conservative groups. The administration would understand the conservative movement better than the conservatives understood themselves.

The IRS probes show intent. The traffic analysis indicates capability. Together they suggest a potential ability to essentially decapitate, infiltrate or provoke the administration's political enemies. Moreover, the administration can use the data in a purge. It can be used to deconstruct opposition factions on the Left.

All in all, it is a very powerful tool. That's why they wanted it.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment

Dr. Mabuse
Fabrizio Quattrocchi came to my mind too. The MILAC for your warning the neighbors and spoiling the script is P7, or P to the seventh power for Proper Prior Planning Prevents Piss Poor Performance.

What to do?

First, Be sane and accurate. Do not go off half cocked chasing every red herring that Axelrod puts out to discredit you. My argument has been that the Birther stories are probably planted by the Left to distract the Right and ease demonization campaigns already prepared. My suspicion was always that there were other more valid and provable reasons to hold Obama as Constitutionally ineligible that were not followed up.

Second, Network securely when possible, as has been pointed out this is not a secure location. Do not be the neighborhood loner or crank. Your reputation is that of your cause.

Third, Never in any manner advocate or threaten any criminal act. Know that agent provacateurs are present.

Four, Do not be a First Mover but be prepared to be the second. Your advice is excellent. Always have that cell phone camera ready. Know what to do.

Five, Go Alinsky on them. Turn their methods against them. Hypocrisy is their biggest weakness in the public eye. Millions, including my mother who gets her information from the "Sun Sentinel" (spit), believe that it was correct to target the Tea Party because they are terrible people who greedily put in for a tax exemption when they do political work. Point out every example of tax exempt political activity by the Left. God made Al Gore a fat man in a big house for a reason. Use it.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
All Comments   (61)
All Comments   (61)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
Well, you could be like state and local governments, and permit your male officers of the law to perform warrantless body cavity searches on female suspects

The quick erosion of the 4th Amendment has had extremely strong, vocal and unstinting support among conservatives. The rollback of the constitution began under the Burgher court once Nixon's and Reagan's Supreme Court appointees achieved a majority.

The Republican's "Get tough on Crime" was wildly popular.

Metadata collection is what it now looks like.

It is really incredibly hilarious and ironic that conservatives are now sounding the alarm bells about metadata collection of the Federal Government, presumably only because they have lost the last two elections.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Logging on is now routinely difficult.

Your traditional link is normally non-functional.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Maybe its just because I have brain lesions but does anyone else find it strange that this only applies to one telecom (Verizon)? Are there similar orders for all the other players we just haven't heard about? And if not, why not? Once again I wonder if we're being misdirected, looking at the right hand while the left one is picking our pocket.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Now that *yet another* huge shoe has dropped with this PRISM travesty, how hard is it to imagine that name and email addresses were harvested from #AttackWatch and flag at whitehouse dot gov for handy search terms for the PRISM database?
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Of all the communications media I think the medium most risky to surveillance is verbal; next is casual written, like email; then printed media like magazines and blogs, where the message is considered and re-written (hopefully) before being sent out.

But generally I think this is our hope: the web, email, the distributed intelligence of this vast network. The government cannot control the truth; even the Soviets had their samizdat.

But knowing the truth does no good without a result and in this country that means elections--that's our only real [civilized] hope.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Remember, war is politics taken to the extreme.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
I think we are so far down the road to tyrannical government the only way back is for groups of states to form sovereign unions and 'opt out' of federal participation. It could definitely lead to a civil war but perhaps that is what is meant when talking about refreshing the tree of liberty with the blood of tyrants and patriots. I still believe those of ability prefer self determination, those who are merely opportunistic raiders or layabouts make poor soldiers.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Just love, greatest respect, and a prayer for all our brave men who who fought and died on this day in the Normandy invasion.

Ronald Reagan’s moving D-Day speech at Normandy:
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Hold on while I adjust my tinfoil hat before bringing up this thought.

Regarding all those inappropriate questions the IRS has been asking conservative groups: What if this wasn't just harassment, but was an attempt to compile a database.

Here's an article about some of the question that were asked

1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
I think they are listening in on just about everyone, if they so choose.

Who is going to stop them? The Supreme Court? Congress? The Department of Justice? Nope, Nope, Nope.

There is no check on what Obama does, and he knows it. That's why we live in a tyranny now. It's a velvet tyranny for the moment, but if things get a little difficult, then people will get hurt.

And for all you optimists that are thinking of ways to yet reverse this, why don't you try something on the grassroots level, like taking over your school board and trying to change the curriculum. It is difficult to well nigh impossible. The cultural and political forces arrayed against this seemingly low level unit of popular democracy are formidable.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
It does seem like there are too many of them and not enough of us. But we have to fight them without becoming them. We must. If we lose ourselves in this battle what will we have gained? We will have become the enemy.

BFTP's rules should be printed out and stuck to the fridge.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
From one Navy guy to another...and what rules were those?
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
1 2 3 4 Next View All