The Siege of Merimna
When Halsey’s TF 38 tested the Japanese defenses of the central Philippines in late 1944 the admiral was stunned by the imperial weakness. “We had found the central Philippines a hollow shell with weak defenses and skimpy facilities. In my opinion, this was the vulnerable belly of the imperial dragon. The time might be ripe not only to strike Manila, but perhaps to mount a far larger offensive. Specifically, I began to wonder whether I dared recommend that MacArthur shift to Leyte the invasion which he had planned for Mindanao, and advance the date well ahead of the scheduled November 15.”
And now in the first months of 2013 the probes are coming the other way. Too many provocations which once would have drawn a vigorous response from Washington are now completely unanswered. The mighty US government, which once ruled by the power of its reputation alone seems inert and strangely immobile. Almost as if it were sleeping — or worse.
Hackers have taken over the website of the sentencing commission of the Department of Justice and gleefully distributed confidential material found on it. Now they have posted it to servers and will release the encryption keys unless the administration yields to its demands.
Iran, a third rate power, contemptuously assuming a tone that once only America could use, has just announced it “would consider any attack on Syria an attack on itself”. It is daring Washington to try to overthrow Syria, daring Obama to take it on almost as if it suspects he will never attempt it.
North Korea, not content with threatening to target the US with its ballistic missiles, is now threatening South Korea. If young Kim fears Obama he is not showing it.
The US government has gone months without catching a single individual linked to the attack on its North African diplomatic installations. Hillary Clinton lamented that she could not even fire the State Department employees whose incompetence allowed the attacks to happen. The French have been left to largely fend for themselves in Mali, the Western alliance strangely absent from the fray. Algeria did not even bother to consult with the administration when it decided to launch an counterattack al Qaeda at a gas plant that cost dozens of Western lives. They ignored Washington — the once indispensable capital — probably because they could.
President Obama is anxious to negotiate with the Taliban in Afghanistan, eager to end campaign he once called the war of necessity whether victorious or not. Indeed the word “victory” has been expunged from his lexicon. His aides have already hinted that the war against al-Qaeda is now essentially over whoever won. Lee Smith has summarized the situation cogently as follows: “the Obama administration has left [a vacuum] in the region, from Libya to Syria”.
It is a vacuum everywhere. The US government is being treated like a toothless, contemptible thing. It is easy to see why. The US government has been bankrupt for a long time. Obama’s home state of Illinois has had its credit rating trashed to the worst in the country.
But it is not just the regular screwups. What is different is that the foes are openly out in the field without apparent fear. Even judicial conservatives are finding the nerve to take him on. “The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals today invalidated one of President Obama’s most despotic overreaches to date: his attempt to use the Constitution’s recess appointment power to make appointments despite the absence of a recess.”
All across the board a wide variety of people are beginning to suspect something similar to what Halsey found in 1944. That under the bombast and veneer of invincibility the Obama administration is a shambling, incompetent, hollow shell. It has self-admittedly lost control of its borders; it is unable to pass a budget and now for all the world to see it cannot even protect its own diplomatic missions.
But there can be no joy in this collapse even among the President’s worst political opponents. The weakness has exposed everyone who relies on the US for leadership and stability to great and proximate danger. For the challenges are certain to pick in pace as the hyenas converge from every point of the compass. All across the world people are wondering: what is holding the tent roof up?
The perfect metaphor for the situation created by president Obama was created by Edward Plunkett in his classic short story The Sword of Welleran. In it, a fabled city rich with treasure is defended largely by the memory of its past glory and strength. But now the brigands suspect that the great heroes standing firm upon the wall are but fakes. One evening a pair of raiders, their lives already forfeit climb the wall, and still sick with fear approach the figures whose deeds still struck terror in the hands of the bandits. And they find them nothing but statues.
Now beyond the Cyresians the suspicion grew that Merimna’s heroes were dead, and a plan was devised that a man should go by night and come close to the figures upon the ramparts and see whether they were Welleran, Soorenard, Mommolek, Rollory, Akanax, and young Iraine. And all were agreed upon the plan, and many names were mentioned of those who should go, and the plan matured for many years. It was during these years that watchers clustered often at sunset upon the mountains but came no nearer. Finally, a better plan was made, and it was decided that two men who had been by chance condemned to death should be given a pardon if they went down into the plain by night and discovered whether or not Merimna’s heroes lived….
they arose and came to the ramparts and climbed over them and came at once upon the figure of Welleran, and they bowed low to the ground, and Seejar said: ‘O Welleran, we came to see whether thou didst yet live.’ And for a long while they waited with their faces to the earth. At last Seejar looked up towards Welleran’s terrible sword, and it was still stretched out pointing to the carved armies that followed after Fear. And Seejar bowed to the ground again and touched the horse’s hoof, and it seemed cold to him. And he moved his hand higher and touched the leg of the horse, and it seemed quite cold. At last he touched Welleran’s foot, and the armour on it seemed hard and stiff. Then as Welleran moved not and spake not, Seejar climbed up at last and touched his hand, the terrible hand of Welleran, and it was marble. Then Seejar laughed aloud, and he and Sajar-Ho sped down the empty pathway and found Rollory, and he was marble too. Then they climbed down over the ramparts and went back across the plain, walking contemptuously past the figure of Fear, and heard the guard returning round the ramparts for the third time, singing of Welleran; and Seejar said: ‘Ay, you may sing of Welleran, but Welleran is dead and a doom is on your city.’
Now they call the plunderers from far and wide to descend on the city.
It does not seem too far fetched to imagine that North Korea, Iran, al-Qaeda, China, Russia long held back by the memory of great Americans, are now going to be bolder after finding from their probes that America’s great heroes have gone to their fathers. And all that defends the West’s walls are Kerry, Hagel, Brennan, Holder, Napolitano, Jack Lew and Obama. They may briefly hear Chris Matthews singing the paeans of the Man From Chicago. But they know he is but a hack. ‘Ay, you may sing of Welleran, but Welleran is dead and a doom is on your city.’
Fables, even those as beautiful as Edward Plunkett’s are warnings before they are epitaphs. The curious inability of Washington to go after any who will not be commanded by its words is startling. Bluff is all they have left and the bluff no longer works. The plunderers are near — they must be nearing — but they have not yet struck. The city is asleep but it may yet awake. America still stands gleaming on the fruited plain, safe still for a while. But for how long while its enemies are roused? Some time, perhaps, but not forever.
Now into Paradise no sorrow may ever come, but may only beat like rain against its crystal walls, yet the souls of Merimna’s heroes were half aware of some sorrow far away as some sleeper feels that some one is chilled and cold yet knows not in his sleep that it is he. And they fretted a little in their starry home. Then unseen there drifted earthward across the setting sun the souls of Welleran, Soorenard, Mommolek, Rollory, Akanax, and young Iraine. Already when they reached Merimna’s ramparts it was just dark, already the armies of the four Kings had begun to move, jingling, down the deep ravine. But when the six warriors saw their city again, so little changed after so many years, they looked towards her with a longing that was nearer to tears than any that their souls had known before, crying to her: ‘O Merimna, our city: Merimna, our walled city. ‘How beautiful thou art with all thy spires, Merimna. For thee we left the earth, its kingdoms and little flowers, for thee we have come away for awhile from Paradise …
‘Thou art in great danger, Merimna, because thou art so beautiful. Must thou perish tonight because we no more defend thee, because we cry out and none hear us, as the bruised lilies cry out and none have known their voices?’
Must it indeed? In Plunkett’s fable Merimna awoke in time to save itself. But Plunkett the author could write his ending to fiction. The people living in 2013′s real world have yet to pen the finish to their own exciting tale.
The Three Conjectures at Amazon Kindle for $1.99
Storming the Castle at Amazon Kindle for $3.99
No Way In at Amazon Kindle $8.95, print $9.99
Tip Jar or Subscribe or Unsubscribe






The reason no one that was in Benghazi that day will ever tell the truth of what happened there is because it was all a CIA run operation, doing what the CIA has done for the last 12 years, with more of an emphasis on illegal gun running, nor will any of those that attacked Benghazi consulate ever be apprehended because it would revel those secrets.
America is breaking its will on Afghanistan and should leave in hast, 0bama does not want America as a World Policemen and is willing to hallow out its Military to do so, 0bama is more concerned with the internal and wants the power to stay with his ideology.
The mills of the gods grind slowly
but then they accelerate at an exponential rate
until everything is ground up and they explode.
Anyone who hasn’t read Niven’s, “The Magic Goes Away”, should find the time.
(and it would make a fine movie)
As depressing as are current events and the Obambus regime, if you look at world and US history over the past 50 years you see more bumbling about than otherwise. Arguably you get that same view over all of recorded history in all nations and places. Opportunities lost, yes. Incipient disaster, maybe not. Obambus, the Hildabeast, Pelosi and Reid, these are clowns for the ages, though just who will be around to laugh is unknown to us now. God’s mercy on us all.
You list the failures, but you are more generous than warranted.
What glimmering of evidence is there that it is “screwups”? What indication is there in word or deed that this is in fact not the deliberate intent of TWANLOC?
Subotai Bahadur
The Bard had a better messenger deliver the bombast to a nobler foe.
The French nobles were better than dissipated clerks we have saddled ourselves with. They drank the cup their conceit had mixed. Those who would be our Lords would pass the bitter lees to those they despise. We can comfort ourselves with the expectation that they will gain no respect from the advancing foe. Who for all their faults despises the craven and treasonous.
America still stands gleaming on the fruited plane, safe still for a while.
s/b plain
I believe George Herbert Walker Bush began the new world order with the invasion of Iraq and his son finish the work there big events laying the foundation for today. But his son had no idea the trogn horse within how Wall street destroy the entire world economy then idelogues made this even worse but we are now in the process of recovery to gain back our wealth
More important is what is going on in the invisible and this began with the raising from the DEAD of Jesus Christ, King of Kings Lord of Lords sitting at the RIGHT HAND of God
The war with the demons
Ephesians 6
“0 Finally, be strong in the Lord and in his mighty power. 11 Put on the full armor of God, so that you can take your stand against the devil’s schemes. 12 For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms. 13 Therefore put on the full armor of God, so that when the day of evil comes, you may be able to stand your ground, and after you have done everything, to stand. 14 Stand firm then, with the belt of truth buckled around your waist, with the breastplate of righteousness in place, 15 and with your feet fitted with the readiness that comes from the gospel of peace. 16 In addition to all this, take up the shield of faith, with which you can extinguish all the flaming arrows of the evil one. 17 Take the helmet of salvation and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God.
18 And pray in the Spirit on all occasions with all kinds of prayers and requests. With this in mind, be alert and always keep on praying for all the Lord’s people
Call me a Necromancer if you want but I am grateful of being a witness as to how the Great Aragorn who descended to hell in the Paths of the dead can summon even the cowards creating the army of the dead to defeat the demons as the angels applaud the miracles
Be careful as we all must the greater Sauron does not have control of your typing fingers I believe and how do we know if China is working hard to change North Korea and USA is working hard to change Iran?
Follow Wretchard’s link to “stunned by the Imperial weakness” and continue to the next chapter and you will find this
Those bold sections above are a remarkably SMALL recognition of the bravery of Taffy 3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taffy_3
The losses from driving headlong at the Japanese battleships were just a bit more than just “heavy but not crippling”. It was the naval equivalent of what Iwo Jima is to the USMC!
Obama in charge? no problemo, manage up!
I am old and will be dead soon enough, but I will go to my grave crying for my children and grandchildren. I cannot apologize to them for what has been done to our country. I can only moan the near-extinguishing of what was once that bright and shining city on a hill but is now merely a blinkered troup of navel-gazers, unable even to rouse its own, much less inspire anyone else. Admiral Halsey’s been told: Don’t call us, we’ll call you (Force is soooo primitive, don’t you know?). My children, my children: I’m so sorry for what you have been left. Please forgive us.
Be not afraid. It is truthfully said that things look darkest before the dawn. Be mindful that present time crawls by in one inch increments, while past time is a blink of an eye. This too shall pass, and he who cannot be named will be gone on 20 January 2017, regardless of what some may think and say. Great harm may and will come to the country between now and then, but we shall survive. We always have. Our heroes have not deserted us, they form the basis of our lives, give strength to our arms, and vision to see through the gathering dark. They are always near.
The sword of Welleran is sheathed
The scabbard green with mold
The land the heroes past bequeathed
Now shudders with the cold
As icy winds swirl round her face
And Leftists now on high
Bring forth dishonor and disgrace
With every lefty lie
But heroes are not merely ghosts
They live and always will
They walk yet still their weary posts
Their eyes on yonder hill
Where lurks the man who would be king
Who lies with every breath
And desolation on us bring
And for the country death
He’ll not succeed, the sword’s unsheathed
The marbled ghosts are here
They gleam with light, and laurel wreathed
They always will be near
“the Obama administration has left [a vacuum] in the region, from Libya to Syria”.
I hear tell that nature abhors a vacuum but perhaps that is the tired, old way of thinking that we no longer indulge in.
We forget the wisdom of Chairman Mao at our own great peril.
“Power” does indeed, “Grow From The Barrel Of A Gun”.
‘Be not afraid. It is truthfully said that things look darkest before the dawn. Be mindful that present time crawls by in one inch increments, while past time is a blink of an eye. This too shall pass(…)’
Thank you Sir Walt
SF
“What difference does it make?”
Anyway, there are Bitter Clingers to disarm.
Wretchard, I find your blog consistently interesting and insightful, but I wonder if this time you overstate your case.
Your three examples (North Korea, Iran, and the hackers) do not rise to the level of major threats. The United States, although weakly led, is still the only superpower.
I don’t believe we are in imminent danger of conquest.
As to disarming the Bitter Clingers, the NY Post reports “Gun-range owners and gun-rights advocates are encouraging hundreds of thousands of owners to defy the law, saying it’d be the largest act of civil disobedience in state history.”
Also:
Egypt is now in turmoil, heading perhaps for chaos.
There are rumors of big defense cuts, both in deployment resources and personnel.
The first sign was last year, when Hillary went to China and sat in her hotel room for days. The Chinese wouldn’t see the US secretary of state. She had become a nothing. The Algerians didn’t even bother to consult when they took back the gas plant.
Mark Steyn says administration is living in a “simulacrum” — a kind of holodeck. Hillary talks about her dear dead friend Chris. They speak of spending trillions. About leading the region. It’s like talking about Steiner and moving imaginary divisions around a map.
It’s heading, perceptibly now toward a total system failure. What happens when health care premiums triple as they are reported to be heading that way? At some point there are too many irons in the fire and some of them melt.
There’s no closure. Everything is fake, even the singing of the national anthem. There’s an initiative a week and nothing comes of the initiatives of the last week. Reality has imitated art. The pillars are now truly styrofoam and the greek god addressing the assembled heroes may just standing in front of a cardboard temple.
This is horrible. Of course things won’t fall apart quite so abruptly. There’s a lot of ruin in a country. But how much longer can it go on?
Tim. There won’t be any imminent conquest because the disparity in strength between the US and its nearest rival is still great. But if the US loses credibility things suddenly become much more expensive than previously. It’s like a bankrupt who is suddenly forced to pay cash for everything because he can’t even qualify for a department store credit card.
Legitimacy and confidence are intangible things. They uphold the dollar. For the most part they keep the peace. You only had to sail the aircraft carrier near to shore to calm it because it was your reputation, not the aircraft carrier, which did the trick. No society can long operate if it needs one policeman for every citizen. It must be 99% voluntary cooperation so the policemen can deal with the remaining 1%. As soon as credibility and legitimacy is gone, there aren’t enough bureaucrats, policemen or air wings to do what a word or a look used to be able to accomplish for nearly nothing.
Tim (14),
I’ll grant you the reason we’re not already ruined is that the rest of the world is in even worse shape. Small comfort, that.
Low Information Voter = Slave to Fashion (S2F)
Didn’t you see Hillary’s fashionable “Clark Kent” glasses?
Change the fashion and you get a change in government. No need for a revolution. They’ll come quietly. They can hear the sirens approach.
MANAGE UP!
Cabinet members have been dropping like flies. Nixon was infinitely tougher than this lot and even he went quietly. With Obama and Biden gone, Boehner becomes President. That will frost Harry Reid so much he’ll become catatonic (that’s not too big a step after all).
SF @ 12 is right. It’s always darkest before the dawn.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SzO11KQLskM
The wheel is turning, isn’t it?
Barack Obama’s earliest known activism was railing against apartheid in 1981, yet he appears to be imposing his own version of apartheid onto the United States. Imposing gun control onto the natives seems to be part of that scheme. Apartheid South Africa routinely forbade black people from owning guns. (In theory, black people were allowed to apply for gun licenses starting in 1983, but almost none of their applications were accepted until the apartheid regime ended in 1994.)
One the reasons why South Africa’s contribution to the Allied cause during World War II was so half-hearted was because the Smuts government was only interested in arming white South Africans. It is also worthy of note that one of the key grievances of Gandhi’s Salt March was the British Empire’s imposition of gun control onto Indian natives. So, when Barack Obama talks of natives “clinging” to their guns and their religion, he is sounding much like an old-fashioned imperialist trying the crush a native uprising.
The question the Opposition is facing is just how far were are willing to go to face down a would-be tyrant who seeks to disarm Americans. Is the Opposition prepared, to paraphrase the then President of the African National Congress Oliver Tambo, prepared to “make America ungovernable” for Barack Obama? Or is the song “Give Me My Machine Gun” only to be sung by men Barack Obama likes?
#4
And England answered:
“Bid him achieve me; and then sell my bones.”
After that, Agincourt.
What a worthless bunch of cry babies.
Is Obama the worst President in history? Yes.
Is he antithetical to all that makes American great? Absolutely.
Will it take decades to recover form his lunatic policies? Yes again.
But what is most shocking is how many Americans are willing to give up, unwilling to stand and fight for the freedoms their forefathers died for.
I’m not talking about the brain dead liberals who can no longer reason their way to the obvious.
I’m talking about the conservatives so busy crying over defeat that they no longer care to bring America back to greatness.
If we Jews gave up as quickly we wouldn’t be here much less have our own country.
Where the hell are your balls?
Obama’s Campaign operation to get callers for gun control to assault their representatives on Friday failed to increase phone traffic in Democrat offices.
Becoming effective Bitter Clingers:
Video: Milwaukee County sheriff’s PSA on self-protection
In the PSA, Sheriff David Clarke says, “With officers laid off and furloughed, simply calling 911 and waiting is no longer your best option. You could beg for mercy from a violent criminal, hide under the bed, or you can fight back. But are you prepared?”
“You have a duty to protect yourself and your family. We’re partners now. Can I count on you?”
Clarke urges listeners to take a firearm safety course and handle a firearm “so you can defend yourself until we get there.”
—
@ 7. MachiasPrivateer
“As an experienced aviator General Mitchell realized that the only place for safe landings was to the right of the field, where the original sod was still firm. The wing commander promptly seized a pair of signal flags, ran to the end of the strip, and, acting as a landing signal officer, assisted the Navy planes in making a safe landing.”
Reminiscent of the Heroic assistance given by POTUS and Sec Clinton wrt Benghazi.
#3 Subotai Bahadur,
Forgive me for saying so, but you remind of a story about U.S. Grant. After listening to army of the Potomac officers tell him about the great genius of Robert E. Lee, he finally blew up and told them to stop worrying about what General Lee was going to do to them and start worrying about what they were going to do to General Lee.
Stop worrying so much about TWANLOCs. While these people are no longer our countrymen, were are also no longer theirs, and we owe them nothing. It’s interesting to note the open defiance to the new NY anti-gun law- as our host does in #15- and also to note that the law itself was passed with such haste that they forgot to exempt police officers from its restrictions. That’s not a sign of strength- and neither are the sheriffs and state legislatures who are openly refusing to go along with any new federal gun restrictions.
To paraphrase something Andrew Jackson said of Chief Justice John Marshall, they’ve made their decisions- now let them enforce them. They certainly have decided that they want to disarm the American people- now they have to do it. It isn’t going so well, so far.
Drums, drums, drums in the deep. Not. Cheer up.
Hands Off My Gun
- David Mamet
The individual is not only best qualified to provide his own personal defense, he is the only one qualified to do so.
For the saying implies but does not name the effective agency of its supposed utopia. The agency is called “The State,” and the motto, fleshed out, for the benefit of the easily confused must read “The State will take from each according to his ability: the State will give to each according to his needs.” “Needs and abilities” are, of course, subjective. So the operative statement may be reduced to “the State shall take, the State shall give.”
All of us have had dealings with the State, and have found, to our chagrin, or, indeed, terror, that we were not dealing with well-meaning public servants or even with ideologues but with overworked, harried bureaucrats. These, as all bureaucrats, obtain and hold their jobs by complying with directions and suppressing the desire to employ initiative, compassion, or indeed, common sense. They are paid to follow orders.
Rule by bureaucrats and functionaries is an example of the first part of the Marxist equation: that the Government shall determine the individual’s abilities.
As rules by the Government are one-size-fits-all, any governmental determination of an individual’s abilities must be based on a bureaucratic assessment of the lowest possible denominator.
President Obama, in his reelection campaign, referred frequently to the “needs” of himself and his opponent, alleging that each has more money than he “needs.”
But where in the Constitution is it written that the Government is in charge of determining “needs”? And note that the president did not say “I have more money than I need,” but “You and I have more than we need.” Who elected him to speak for another citizen?
It is not the constitutional prerogative of the Government to determine needs. One person may need (or want) more leisure, another more work; one more adventure, another more security, and so on. It is this diversity that makes a country, indeed a state, a city, a church, or a family, healthy. “One-size-fits-all,” and that size determined by the State has a name, and that name is “slavery.”
Healthy government, as that based upon our Constitution, is strife. It awakens anxiety, passion, fervor, and, indeed, hatred and chicanery, both in pursuit of private gain and of public good. Those who promise to relieve us of the burden through their personal or ideological excellence, those who claim to hold the Magic Beans, are simply confidence men. Their emergence is inevitable, and our individual opposition to and rejection of them, as they emerge, must be blunt and sure; if they are arrogant, willful, duplicitous, or simply wrong, they must be replaced, else they will consolidate power, and use the treasury to buy votes, and deprive us of our liberties. It was to guard us against this inevitable decay of government that the Constitution was written. Its purpose was and is not to enthrone a Government superior to an imperfect and confused electorate, but to protect us from such a government.
Walt @ 9: Thanks! I needed that!!
Sorry, I left off the first paragraph of Mamet’s piece, which was really needed to head my post:
“Karl Marx summed up Communism as “from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.” This is a good, pithy saying, which, in practice, has succeeded in bringing, upon those under its sway, misery, poverty, rape, torture, slavery, and death.“
Re “Hillary Clinton lamented that she could not even fire the State Department employees whose incompetence allowed the attacks to happen.”
For some reason nobody payed attention to even worse (in my op) utterance: she claimed that few years ago they could not “predict” latest events. She seems to be proud that they achieve something they did not even expected to achieve, but in reality they failed and do not even know it. And it is the most dangerous form of failure. Unfortunately they will ran away and we will pay.
Re # 23. Doug
“…Rule by bureaucrats and functionaries is an example of the first part of the Marxist equation: that the Government shall determine the individual’s abilities.”
And individual’s needs. As in: there are only 2 of you, you do not this large house. The family next door has 10 kids and live in a small apartment. And it is only fair for you to move out to make space for this family in need.
Or why are you driving this large car? You can use public transport, or, even better, a bicycle. It will give you some needed exercise and improve your health.
Etc…
tim fairbank @ 14: “I don’t believe we are in imminent danger of conquest”
Perhaps not – although who thought that about France on May 9, 1940? Nonetheless, the danger is not conquest, per se – the danger is that someone, maybe China, maybe some Islamic entity, will decide it’s time for a shot at the title.
War is very dangerous, to victor and vanquished alike. The social tensions that have been created by the progressive movement since 1945 could well come to culmination in a war setting, with unknowable consequences.
Everything is fake, even the singing of the national anthem
You got a way with words LOL.
King Barack has one foreign enemy, Israel. But he sees domestic enenies everywhere. His enemies oppose his creeping totalitarian socialism. They speak of dismantling crony capitalism and restoring the constitutional republic. These people have guns. The King is not happy.
Wretchard #15:
Even in the Pentagon, these people live in their own worlds. They conceive things and then wonder why they were not produced by their underlings instantly. In their minds the job is done, the hard part was conception. Ferreting out all those facts and figures and assembling them into a coherent whole is mere trivia.
And at that, we are talking about the very best of those people. The worst of them conceive things in their own minds, tell no one to accomplish them, and assume they have been done.
After the Oklahoma City tornadoes of May 1999, Bill Clinton paid the usual perfunctory visit to the area and in a speech said he would start a program to reduce the power of tornadoes. Of course, that was never done or even attempted, and one ever even expected it to be done, but he nonetheless received polite applause at the time; he got credit for the thought, which is what counted.
Two days ago on FNC there was a piece about the Hurricane Sandy survivors in Staten Island, living in tents with no electricity with temps of 16F at night. What? What! Wasn’t that all fixed within minutes after Obama made his visit? No? No! How can that be?
Somewhere those people are warm and well fed, relaxing in front of the fire in their new Obama-provided hurricane-proof homes, secure in the knowledge that Bill Clinton’s tornado reducer effort has made them impregnable. Somewhere, there is a Mudville where the mighty Casey did not strike out. But we don’t live there.
Spain last socialist gov. quietly disbanded itself. Could it happen here?
Just a thought.
machias-privateer #17 Hillary indeed is wearing Clark Kent glasses but she has double vision and can;t find the phone booth.
A lot of things have needed fixing since ‘round 1972.
Just one: our nation’s taxpayers cannot be expected to finance every military intervention over every inch of ocean and land on this planet forever. Signs are we’re gradually shucking-off that historic load. This is a good thing.
As we’re seeing, this puts new stresses on individual governments in far-off places like France and Nigeria and Iran. And our attitude should be to test and probe the governments’ responses to these stresses with an eye to discovering who administers these “nations,” what their values are, and what level of threat their corruption or incompetence or infidelity may pose to our interests. The tertiary riots occurring now in Egypt also counsel us to be patient, too: revolutions change color over time.
In the middle-East governments are like mirages. We put too much faith in them as Westerners. As we segue away from depending on the region for energy we can care less stridently about the day-to-day mirage-shifts from Beirut to Isfahan, and adopt a more circumspect stance towards them. We may not like the way a “new” Libya “liberates” foreign hostages from insurgents, and we won’t approve of Iran’s pact with Syria, and we’ll probably titter about Hollande’s adventures in French-Colonial Africa, but, it is because we can afford to. Southern Europe and the Levant have been put on alert that we’re done taking out their trash for ‘em.
(To Mark Steyn’s popularized theory that Chinese naval interdiction will be a poor substitute for Anglo-dominance of the seas, and that we should oppose it tooth-and-nail, I say it’s just as likely that Beijing will strive to simulate as perfectly as possible America’s interdiction protocals in the West Pacific, if only to maintain the continuity in trans-Pacific container-vessel traffic that China’s economy depends on.)
An old adage that no longer applies to American foreign policy is the “Who lost [name any nation]?” one. “Who lost Egypt?” “Who lost Vietnam?” “Who lost China?” “Who lost Afghanistan?” “Who lost Libya?” What difference, at this point, does it make?
Wise Gurus say, “You must be lost in order to be found.” How better to get ostensible allies to start shouldering their international loads than to deliberately “lose” the moocher-nation adjacent to them?
Re # 34. steveaz
“…Some say, you need to be lost in order to be found.”
Not necessarily. I wouldn’t mind for this admin. getting lost.
BTW, re. “some say”. Where I heard this turn of a phrase before?
34. steveaz–
I’m pretty much with you. What we’ve had here is an international enabler relationship: we did the dirty work for everybody, and were proud of it, and made the others weaker in the process. It probably made sense during the Cold War but not for some time.
Add to this that the weak nations stuck it to us whenever they saw it as their national interest, knowing we’d put up with it, but over time I think this caused a lot of bitterness.
We can still be strong, plenty strong enough to protect our fundamental interest, but without poking into every international nook and cranny.
And: the age of massed armies lining up and duking it out probably ended in Iraq, at least for the foreseeable future. As you implied, we will be ”fighting” differently for some time to come.
North Korea, Iran, al-Qaeda, China, Russia…
I’d rather live in Russia. They seem to be more free than either on the list and are becoming more so than USSA.
Re # 37. Annoy Mouse
“I’d rather live in Russia. They seem to be more free than either on the list and are becoming more so than USSA.”
Do not bet on it. Not yet anyway. Outside of large cities it is still almost 19-th century.
Those which history and reality itself once deemed failures have been pushed to the front ranks of America’s pop culture and political ramparts on their own initiative and helped by their allies, the now partly moribund children of success.
Those who would compete with America or would oppose it recognize water having fallen to their own level, and smell weakness.
One wonders at the competence of those that need to be given equality rather than seizing it for themselves, as was the case when reality, not faith, ruled the roost.
A liberal culture centered around blame, fear, and excuses is the direct opposite of what got us here. Fractal geometry and aircraft carriers aren’t created by pouting but by seizing the day. Transform our history into a villain at your own risk.
Could it be any clearer that Hillary Clinton is the Secretary of State in name alone? Obama gave her the position to humiliate and destroy her, and it is playing out just as intended. She should have known better. Maybe she did.
Most American’s are like the Costa Concordia’s passengers going about their search for happiness and attending the party, watching Scotty grow and all that. The democrats around him obeying his commands and never doubting him for one moment.
A few American’s are along for the ride knowing the skipper is not to be trusted and is incompetent using ideology to trump all difficulties while blaming long gone Bush for all his failures.
He chooses to disarm American’s while allowing the Iranian’s to make an Atomic bomb. He cannot disarm North Korea but believes he can disarm by decree lawful citizens using their rights.
The man is seeing the world as he saw Chicago. The world is seeing Barry for what he is and acting on that fact.
I’m unfortunately along for the ride all I can do is watch and until the time I have to jump the ship and fend for myself I’ll watch and with beer and popcorn handy wait for the next shoe to drop.
I think a lot of democrats are regretting getting what they wanted, now that we all are getting what the democrats deserve.
Sucks to be us!
Just finished ’1453′ by George Crowley – and, now this…
Maybe after the fall we can – in a still small voice – post something as bitter, as futile, as final as Sphrantzes writing after the collapse of Constantinople:
“I am George Sphrantzes the pitiful First Lord of the Imperial Wardrobe, presently known by the monastic name Gregory. I wrote the following account of the events that occurred during my wretched life. It would have been fine for me not to have been born or to have perished in childhood. Since this did not happen, let it be known that I was born on Tuesday, August 30, 1401.”
We Americans do not yet have to gaze rearward to another era. Just five years or so. We only have to farsight forward another half decade. The next four years will tell the tale.
As others have pointed out, we’ve endured bad presidents before, and in our history, we’ve certainly experienced tougher times; e.g., the Civil War, the Great Depression. There is a difference, though. Throughout our history, I don’t think we’ve had a president who so completely hated who and what we are as a nation. To President Obama, we happy, bitterly clinging few who comprise about half the electorate aren’t the loyal opposition, fellow Americans who happen to disagree with many of his party’s policies and ideological underpinnings. To him and to other authoritarian-minded members of the committed, professional Left, we are the enemy, more dangerous and deranged than the mad mullahs of Iran. We–you and me–are standing in the way of the Utopia socialists dream about and talk about and think about. To him and his like-minded followers and fellow travelers, we’re what the Chinese communists called ‘wreckers’, what the Soviets called Kulaks.
President Obama hates us. To tell the truth, I’m not so fond of him, either.
Concerning China’s threat to America’s seemingly hollow defenses, consider that ouor massive defense posture is based on our massive defense spending. But, how much of our deense spending is actually useful, and how much goes to things which are either irrelevant or actually harmful? How much for daycare for Mom-soldiers and other social engineering measures? How much for diversity? Environmental compliance? For restyling the ceremonial dres uniforms or putting the Army into Europoid berets?Contractuaal compliance and lawfare aimed at our own field forces? Retierement benies and paying a “suitable” wage to enlistees? For corporate boondoggles?Consider the decline in atual deployable ships, air wings, and ground force units, that is what wins wars and is the true measure of military power.
You might also wish to view and consider the following forecast of the growing threat.
http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/does-china-plan-to-establish-chinese-cities-and-special-economic-zones-all-over-america
Keep in mind the precedent of what Europe did to China in the 18th century. Too big to totally take over and occupy, also too messy. But not too big to take over and exploit the desirable parts, leaving the rest, the interior to decay in the shadows. Remember the entrepots and international concession centers, like Shanghai, like Hong Kong, the Chinese certainly do.
Once you take over and dominate the important parts, you can then expand further into other areas as they become desirable. Occasional brief, and local conflicts may arise, more at local police actions; how else will the Chinese deal with the Crips, Vice Lords and the like? They may even use native, Round-eye auxiliaries under Chinese direction. Given only a forced choice between Crips and Chinese order, might not many Euro-Americans choose the Chinese as the lesser evil? If that’s not exactly how things happened, it is the way the Chinese believe it happened. Its also a polemic version of how we took over North America from our predecessors.
Another international precedent. In the late 19th Century Egypt defaulted on its debt obligations from the Suez Canal project and from Egyptian government corruption and incompetence; and then the British moved in and took over Egypt to secure their investment. How’s our spending profile looking these days?
During most of antiquity and the Middle Ages China was more advanced, richer and more powerful than the contemporaneous empires in the West. But by the 18th century had become arrogant, supercilious, and overconfident, certain the outside world had noting to offer or teach. China chose to decay and stagnate. And America?
For all our faults, I still think we have something worthy of preserving and passing along to world civilization. But is not Obamaphone Woman, Michael Moore, or contemporary pop “culture”.
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/world/middleeast/article3670109.ece
^^^^ The WND story is now going mainstream.
The Times is now writing that Iran has suffered a HUGE set back at their atomic plant.
#44 Rurik,
You make a swarm of good points.
To borrow something Orwell wrote, we sleep safe in our beds because rough men stand ready to do violence on our behalf. But Americans today do not in fact sleep safely in our beds, despite the trillion dollar military. So I find myself remarkably unconcerned about the prospect of cuts to the defense budget.
What good is the DoD anyway? It doesn’t protect the US border from infiltration by agents of Iran, nor does it protect US territory from the de facto colonization by Mexico. It doesn’t prevent our enemies from making threats to Americans here in the US, nor does it protect Americans abroad from being held hostage by our enemies. It hasn’t maintained a huge technological superiority over our enemies, nor has it protected the advantage we have, because it has been unable to prevent our expensively-developed technology from being stolen with impunity by our rivals and enemies. Or simply sold to anyone with cash.
In short, it is yet another failure of American governance. So cut it, as that will at least mean less money wasted by the regime.
Which is a good thing.