Get PJ Media on your Apple

Faster, Please!

Iran ‘Elections’: Lots of Circus, Not So Much Bread

May 16th, 2013 - 7:31 pm

I’m always entertained by the oceans of ink that get poured out over Iranian “elections.”  As if there were such things.  Iran doesn’t have elections, it stages circuses.  It’s a variation on a famous Cold War theme about the ways a tyranny attempts to trick the people, and how the people, who aren’t fooled at all, respond with tricks of their own.  Workers in the Socialist bloc used to say, “They pretend to pay, and we pretend to work.”  In Iran, the regime pretends to hold elections, and the people try to find the best way to demonstrate their contempt for the regime.  Sometimes they do it by staying away from the “voting booths.”  Sometimes, as in the last presidential elections (you remember 2009, right?), they turn out in big numbers to elect someone who is clearly the antithesis of the theocratic dictator and somehow got on the ballot.  But everybody knows that the actual vote tally is a joke;  like the official numbers for the Chinese economy, the “vote count” is invented in the supreme leader’s chambers.

The mid-June circus will play out in three rings.  First, the selection of the candidates, then voting day, and finally the announcement of the winner.  In each ring, you may be tempted to watch the acrobats (candidates), but the real action is in the dark rooms of the leader.

Selection of the candidates:  Hundreds of people have proposed to run for president, including a few women (talk about spitting into the wind!).  These names go through three filters.  First, they are vetted by the intelligence services, both the Intel Ministry and the Revolutionary Guards’ intel and counterintel gangs.  Then the surviving names pass on to the Guardian Council, which narrows the list to the required number (usually quite small, 4-6).  And then Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei gets to put his chop on the list.

This is the “real election.”  And the candidates are currently vying for the favors of the leader.  Take Mayor Qalibaf of Tehran, for example, a very nasty piece of work who did his pilot training in North Korea.  He’s now bragging about his thuggery, how he personally smashed students and other demonstrators in the streets, etc. etc.  Those “credentials” will help him get on the short list, but past favors to the leader and the Guards will count even more.  They know who and what he is, after all.  Still, the real election is really real, there is an intense war of all against all in Iran today, and, to put it mildly, there is a lot at stake.  The president runs the government, and the government dispenses a lot of money and the power associated with the money.  So deals are being made, and since Iran is a society in which nobody trusts anybody who is not an immediate family member (and even then…), it’s not so easy for the powerful and the power brokers to sort it all out.  Already the Guardian Council has extended its deadline for candidate selection by several days.

Comments are closed.

All Comments   (4)
All Comments   (4)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
"The mid-June circus will play out in three rings. First, the selection of the candidates, then voting day, and finally the announcement of the winner. In each ring, you may be tempted to watch the acrobats (candidates), but the real action is in the dark rooms of the leader."

Ring a bell?
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
uh, no. Perhaps I'm hopelessly ignorant, but I truly have no idea about that which you're hinting.

Some Leftist criticism of the US perhaps? Maybe 150 years ago -- but frankly, even then (and for *every* election prior to that until Washington) -- while *candidates* may have been chosen in "back rooms," the president most certainly was not.

This fact demonstrates perhaps the singularly most remarkable aspect of the USA: government of the people, by the people, (and) for the people -- a revolutionary principle underlying a country if there ever was one!
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Mr. Ledeen:

Interesting article, but I do have a few questions:

1. The regeime may not be popular, but why should that matter to it? As long as the Revolutionary Guards and the secret police are loyal, the regeime is invulnerable, is it not? And, it is my understanding that the regeime does enjoy the approval of the rural masses for whom it provides bread.

2. Panem et Circensses works today as well as it did in Roman times. As long as the government has oil, it will have money. As long as it has money, it will have bread. As long as it has bread, the people, army and secret police are loyal.

3. And more importantly, whatever economic problems Iran may have, their nuclear program is going full blast - and the Obama administration is doing nothing to stop them. Perhaps we should stop focussing on the Iranian people, who either support that program or can do nothing to stop it, and start looking at what happens when Iran ushers in the age of nuclear terrorism.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
i've dealt with these good questions over many years, Battle, let me try to give you thumbnails:

1. The regime fears its people, it expects a big uprising and does everything possible to forestall it. If the West supported the people, the regime could well be overturned. Maybe even fast.

2. "Loyalty" is not word I'd use about Iranians, whether in the streets, the army or the security forces. Some fanatics are willing to die for Khamenei, but not many.

3. Yes the nuclear program proceeds apace (careful about "full blast," heh). I wouldn't say nothing is being done to stop it; they don't seem to have the bomb yet...the best way to act is to further regime even the Washington Post has said...
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
View All